like_that;1847323 wrote:Trump and his supporters are 100% hypocrites on that issue (amongst many others).

Now back to topic since sleeper believes it's his civic duty to try and ruin every thread because he is butt hurt. Sleeper has already been challenged to start two threads (free market debate thread and hypocrisy thread), yet he still hasn't, probably because he has no interest in taking his troll act into a serious debate. Typical troll trash sleeper.

Here's a good one, I called this shit last year it will start to happen more and more. People will start crying foul.

http://www.courant.com/sports/high-schools/hc-hs-cromwell-track-andraya-yearwood-0407-20170406-story.html

Did you read the story about the Texas trans wrestler? If memory serves, it's a girl who became a boy, but Texas rules state that you compete in the gender your birth certificate says, so it was (physically) a boy competing in the girls' state meet and winning it.

like_that;1847323 wrote:Trump and his supporters are 100% hypocrites on that issue (amongst many others).

Now back to topic since sleeper believes it's his civic duty to try and ruin every thread because he is butt hurt. Sleeper has already been challenged to start two threads (free market debate thread and hypocrisy thread), yet he still hasn't, probably because he has no interest in taking his troll act into a serious debate. Typical troll trash sleeper.

Here's a good one, I called this shit last year it will start to happen more and more. People will start crying foul.

http://www.courant.com/sports/high-schools/hc-hs-cromwell-track-andraya-yearwood-0407-20170406-story.html

You are welcome to start threads that interest you and if the stage is set, perhaps I'll participate. Don't be lazy.

Heretic;1847328 wrote:Did you read the story about the Texas trans wrestler? If memory serves, it's a girl who became a boy, but Texas rules state that you compete in the gender your birth certificate says, so it was (physically) a boy competing in the girls' state meet and winning it.

This definitely needs to be top priority of this administration right after making sure adults use the correct bathroom listed on their birth certificate.

Party of small government! AMIRIGHT?!

Heretic;1847328 wrote:Did you read the story about the Texas trans wrestler? If memory serves, it's a girl who became a boy, but Texas rules state that you compete in the gender your birth certificate says, so it was (physically) a boy competing in the girls' state meet and winning it.

I did. It's an interesting story, since Texas (of all states) is one of the few states that actually has girls wrestling. I had conflicting thoughts. On one end, I thought just let her fucking wrestle with the boys and get her ass kicked. On the other hand, the ref me in sees the issue with it. I started a thread about this back in December with a transgender athlete, but by rule the guys weigh and get their skins inspected wearing nothing but compression underwear. The girls weigh in separately/skin inspection with a female staff member with compression shorts and a sports bra. By rule if this girl/guy were allowed to compete with the boys she would be topless weighing with a bunch of other teenage boys. In this day and age as an official, there is no way I want to skin check a girl be appearance even though she identifies as a boy. Lawsuit written all over it.

sleeper;1847333 wrote:You are welcome to start threads that interest you and if the stage is set, perhaps I'll participate. Don't be lazy.

sleeper;1847335 wrote:This definitely needs to be top priority of this administration right after making sure adults use the correct bathroom listed on their birth certificate.

Party of small government! AMIRIGHT?!

You're the one derailing every thread with those topics. Again accept the challenge, or stfu. Not really hard, but we all know insecure troll trash sleeper is not interested in having serious discussions on this forum.

like_that;1847341 wrote:You're the one derailing every thread with those topics. Again accept the challenge, or stfu. Not really hard, but we all know insecure troll trash sleeper is not interested in having serious discussions on this forum.

So you're upset with me because I won't start threads that you want?

Okay!

I would think in most cases, male bodies have an advantage over female bodies.

Also, if the male sex is taking female hormones, that individual still has an unfair advantage.

sleeper;1847335 wrote:This definitely needs to be top priority of this administration right after making sure adults use the correct bathroom listed on their birth certificate.

Party of small government! AMIRIGHT?!

Always comical.



We then observe obama's crowning achievements:

Making health insurance unaffordable

Making school lunches inedible

Allowing men wearing dresses to go pee-pee in the restroom beside your 10 year-old daughters.



Own it.

QuakerOats;1847383 wrote:Always comical.



We then observe obama's crowning achievements:

Making health insurance unaffordable

Making school lunches inedible

Allowing men wearing dresses to go pee-pee in the restroom beside your 10 year-old daughters.



Own it.

GOP owns 100% of the federal government with no filibuster. Can't come up with a plan to fix any of the above.

Don't need government to fix any of it. Eliminating government is the answer.

Best wishes.

QuakerOats;1847394 wrote:Don't need government to fix any of it. Eliminating government is the answer.

Best wishes.

Then you should have no problem passing laws to do that.

You can start with Obamacare. How's that repeal coming? LOL

California has 6 of the 10 most polluted cities in the US [emoji23].

Prop 65 worked wonders.



Liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent.

I don't even know where to begin with this article: https://heatst.com/culture-wars/canadian-writer-sent-her-son-to-ballet-class-because-he-was-acting-too-gendered/?mod=sm_tw_post

Her three-year-old son’s other crimes, which led to the ballet punishment were: not liking Frozen and pink popsicles.

But this isn’t even McLaren’s craziest column. In March she published a piece about the joys of breastfeeding another person’s child. Apparently at a Toronto party years ago, she snuck away into a room where a baby of a Canadian Member of Parliament was lying alone in a car seat. She made the baby suck on her tit even though she was neither lactating or pregnant

CenterBHSFan;1849635 wrote:I don't even know where to begin with this article: https://heatst.com/culture-wars/canadian-writer-sent-her-son-to-ballet-class-because-he-was-acting-too-gendered/?mod=sm_tw_post

Definitely need BIG government to step in!

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/04/25/slow-learners-uc-berkeley-liberals-get-schooled-on-law.html


Since liberals cannot defend their ideas and policies, they simply shut down speech.


They have literally become anti-Americans.

QuakerOats;1849673 wrote:http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/04/25/slow-learners-uc-berkeley-liberals-get-schooled-on-law.html


Since liberals cannot defend their ideas and policies, they simply shut down speech.


They have literally become anti-Americans.

Definitely need BIG government to step in!

No, we need radical progressives to stop attempting to take away the rights of free Americans. Otherwise, civil unrest (at a minimum) is inevitable.

QuakerOats;1849679 wrote:No, we need radical progressives to stop attempting to take away the rights of free Americans. Otherwise, civil unrest (at a minimum) is inevitable.

They have a right to assembly and free speech; see the first amendment.

Cut UC-Berkley funding tomorrow if they continue to deny free speech rights.



Can't wait.

sleeper;1849675 wrote:Definitely need BIG government to step in!

So you're against BIG Government now? Please get your act together.

QuakerOats;1849687 wrote:Cut UC-Berkley funding tomorrow if they continue to deny free speech rights.



Can't wait.

Ah, so you want BIG government to step in?

like_that;1849689 wrote:So you're against BIG Government now? Please get your act together.

Called sarcasm and calling out irony of conservatives who cry about Big Government but have no problem using Big Government to enforce their 1500's regressive ideology.

sleeper;1849698 wrote:Called sarcasm and calling out irony of conservatives who cry about Big Government but have no problem using Big Government to enforce their 1500's regressive ideology.

Yet you are ok with mocking it while at the same time supporting it as long as it fits your narrative.

Like I said, please get your act together.

like_that;1849699 wrote:Yet you are ok with mocking it while at the same time supporting it as long as it fits your narrative.

Like I said, please get your act together.

Government serves its purpose. I'm not sure conservatives are aware of the policies, implemented by big government, that they support without question.