2017 NFL Off-Season Chatter

Pro Sports 468 replies 12,642 views
S
Sonofanump
May 10, 2017 12:31pm
Azubuike24;1852212 wrote:NFL arrest numbers since 2012.


LOL, that does not even include Shaun Rogers gun
Azubuike24's avatar
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
May 10, 2017 12:33pm
Sonofanump;1852237 wrote:LOL, that does not even include Shaun Rogers gun
March 2010.
sleeper's avatar
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 10, 2017 12:50pm
Azubuike24;1852234 wrote:Just posted the numbers. A few media darling teams pretty far left on that graphic.
I appreciate your fact based opinion vs. those who chose feelings over facts.
Automatik's avatar
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
May 10, 2017 1:05pm
I fail to see the "media darlings" who are far left. Maybe Denver?
Heretic's avatar
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
May 10, 2017 1:15pm
Automatik;1852256 wrote:I fail to see the "media darlings" who are far left. Maybe Denver?
If you just pick the 12 teams at the left (since there is a two-arrest gap between 12 and 13), you have definitely Denver and Seattle. You can add Indy and Baltimore based on general success in the recent past. Maybe Chicago if you want to go to the farther back past, although they've been more a punchline than a darling over the past few years.

A lot of the teams there have been generally considered to be dysfunctional at best and ineptly run at worst (SF, Jets, Cleveland, current-age Chicago). But Washington is as bad as any team as far as being a dysfunctional shithole and they're one of the best teams on the chart. And Buffalo also ranks pretty good, so you can't even really correlate "poorly run" with "loaded with criminals".
justincredible's avatar
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
May 10, 2017 1:29pm
Heretic;1852263 wrote:If you just pick the 12 teams at the left (since there is a two-arrest gap between 12 and 13), you have definitely Denver and Seattle. You can add Indy and Baltimore based on general success in the recent past. Maybe Chicago if you want to go to the farther back past, although they've been more a punchline than a darling over the past few years.

A lot of the teams there have been generally considered to be dysfunctional at best and ineptly run at worst (SF, Jets, Cleveland, current-age Chicago). But Washington is as bad as any team as far as being a dysfunctional shithole and they're one of the best teams on the chart. And Buffalo also ranks pretty good, so you can't even really correlate "poorly run" with "loaded with criminals".
The Jets are dysfunctional and inept?

Heretic's avatar
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
May 10, 2017 1:35pm
justincredible;1852268 wrote:The Jets are dysfunctional and inept?


After reading your during-draft gradual meltdown, I figured that one would SHOCK you!
Azubuike24's avatar
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
May 10, 2017 2:49pm
Minnesota, Mike Zimmer, who is touted as being "a no-nonsense, high-character guy." Same guy who coached those "thugs" on the Bengals, same guy who just drafted Dalvin Cook. Not a single word in the media about the Vikings "reputation."

Baltimore, everyone seems to respect them and their front office. I don't really ever hear them being mentioned with a bad reputation. The same franchise who probably employed the guy with the most infamous act of them all (Ray Rice).

Kansas City and Andy Reid, such a lovable and respected coach, drafted Tyreek Hill when nobody else would touch him (worse than Joe Mixon but without the video) and had a player murder his girlfriend in cold blood and kill himself.

Seattle and Denver, enough said. Both of these teams are well-respected by opposing fans and the media, likely because they have recently won big.

Done with the subject, I saw the graphic online and remembered this thread. Figured it would be relevant to post.
sleeper's avatar
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 10, 2017 3:13pm
Azubuike24;1852318 wrote:Minnesota, Mike Zimmer, who is touted as being "a no-nonsense, high-character guy." Same guy who coached those "thugs" on the Bengals, same guy who just drafted Dalvin Cook. Not a single word in the media about the Vikings "reputation."

Baltimore, everyone seems to respect them and their front office. I don't really ever hear them being mentioned with a bad reputation. The same franchise who probably employed the guy with the most infamous act of them all (Ray Rice).

Kansas City and Andy Reid, such a lovable and respected coach, drafted Tyreek Hill when nobody else would touch him (worse than Joe Mixon but without the video) and had a player murder his girlfriend in cold blood and kill himself.

Seattle and Denver, enough said. Both of these teams are well-respected by opposing fans and the media, likely because they have recently won big.

Done with the subject, I saw the graphic online and remembered this thread. Figured it would be relevant to post.
Don't let the troll trash get to you. You stated your case with class and utilized facts instead of feelings. For this, I agree with you.
F
friendfromlowry
Posts: 6,239
May 11, 2017 9:32am
Seems like every day on Twitter sports media is surprised/outraged that Kaepernick doesn't have a job, and they all chalk it up to his kneeling during the national anthem. Why can't it instead be that he's just not good? It's the most important position in all of sports and imperative to winning football games. You'd think if he showed any promise that a team would sign him in spite of his background.
Automatik's avatar
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
May 11, 2017 9:42am
You srs? It it's 100% because of the kneeling and the distraction it comes with it.

Kaep sucks, but look at some of the starting QB bums out there. I still think he'll get picked up eventually.
F
friendfromlowry
Posts: 6,239
May 11, 2017 9:51am
Look at the chart Buike posted. Every team is filled with guys who abuse women/animals, drive drunk, assault others, etc. Kneeling during the anthem is where we draw the line, though? He was joined by a few teammates usually and they still have jobs.
like_that's avatar
like_that
Posts: 26,625
May 11, 2017 9:57am
friendfromlowry;1852463 wrote:Seems like every day on Twitter sports media is surprised/outraged that Kaepernick doesn't have a job, and they all chalk it up to his kneeling during the national anthem. Why can't it instead be that he's just not good? It's the most important position in all of sports and imperative to winning football games. You'd think if he showed any promise that a team would sign him in spite of his background.
+1. If you're good the league will employ you and put up with your shit. If you are shitty, they won't be willing to put up with your baggage. Pretty simple.
like_that's avatar
like_that
Posts: 26,625
May 11, 2017 9:59am
Automatik;1852464 wrote:You srs? It it's 100% because of the kneeling and the distraction it comes with it.

Kaep sucks, but look at some of the starting QB bums out there. I still think he'll get picked up eventually.
I am sure the kneeling plays somewhat of a role, but like I said if he was good he would have been signed by now. Cutler was/is better than Kaep and he couldn't find any interest from any teams allegedly.
Laley23's avatar
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
May 11, 2017 10:00am
He is better than a ton of the backup QBs, and every single 3rd string. He isn't being picked up because he is a distraction.

NFL fans/media straight don't care about assault, drugs, etc. They do ask 1 million questions daily about "disrespecting the flag" etc.
F
friendfromlowry
Posts: 6,239
May 11, 2017 10:06am
I think the distraction thing is overblown. The team was garbage with and without him. IMO, if he and the team were better, people wouldn't care as much.
Automatik's avatar
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
May 11, 2017 10:23am
friendfromlowry;1852473 wrote:I think the distraction thing is overblown. The team was garbage with and without him. IMO, if he and the team were better, people wouldn't care as much.
Overblown? The media went wild after he started kneeling, then it spread across the league.

Agree to disagree, but IMO if the kneeling nonsense never happened, he'd be signed. Yes, being rather shit definitely factors in though.

I'm surprised he hasn't been already, I assumed he'd be picked up following the draft.
sleeper's avatar
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 11, 2017 10:25am
Laley23;1852472 wrote:He is better than a ton of the backup QBs, and every single 3rd string. He isn't being picked up because he is a distraction.

NFL fans/media straight don't care about assault, drugs, etc. They do ask 1 million questions daily about "disrespecting the flag" etc.
He may be better than 3rd stringers or backup QBs, but at what price? He's not going to take a small contract to sit behind other QBs and he's not good enough to be a starter anymore.

Add the flag controversy and why sign him?
sleeper's avatar
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 11, 2017 10:25am
Automatik;1852480 wrote:Overblown? The media went wild after he started kneeling, then it spread across the league.

Agree to disagree, but IMO if the kneeling nonsense never happened, he'd be signed. Yes, being rather shit definitely factors in though.

I'm surprised he hasn't been already, I assumed he'd be picked up following the draft.
This is the risk he took by kneeling. You don't always get to have your cake and eat it too.
F
friendfromlowry
Posts: 6,239
May 11, 2017 10:44am
Automatik;1852480 wrote:Overblown? The media went wild after he started kneeling, then it spread across the league.

Agree to disagree, but IMO if the kneeling nonsense never happened, he'd be signed. Yes, being rather shit definitely factors in though.

I'm surprised he hasn't been already, I assumed he'd be picked up following the draft.
I don't completely disagree with you. It's a combination of distraction vs not good, but IMO it leans more towards him just not being good.
I didn't think it was a distraction regardless of what the media did, but I also could really give a shit less about the media. Ticket sales were nearly identical between 2015 and 2016 so I don't think people cared enough to not show up. The team wasn't good either way. If he had played for Denver or Houston, then maybe it'd be a different discussion.
Heretic's avatar
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
May 11, 2017 11:28am
Kaep is like Tebow. A mediocre guy who's probably capable of being a back-up, but would get so much coverage simply based on who they are and what they've done that they're labeled a "distraction" and get passed over for jobs. Teams put up with star players doing the "look at me!" game, but want their back-ups to be quiet and anonymous, just "good team players" who will step up and do the job when called upon, while drawing no attention to themselves.
W
wkfan
Posts: 1,641
May 11, 2017 12:34pm
friendfromlowry;1852487 wrote:It's a combination of distraction vs not good, but IMO it leans more towards him just not being good.
The better you are, the more baggage teams, fans, owners, etc will overlook.

At his level of production, he is simply not worth the baggage he brings with him.
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 11, 2017 5:48pm
https://www.facebook.com/TheHerd/videos/2015899131964609/

Cowherd is spot on with this debate.
Automatik's avatar
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
May 12, 2017 1:31am
Cowherd has been on fire lately.
F
friendfromlowry
Posts: 6,239
May 12, 2017 10:08am
I always like Cowherd but I know he's a love/hate thing for most people. He's 100x better than some of the other garbage ESPN keeps around.