History doesn't look too kindly on those who defend fascist governments.QuakerOats;1835918 wrote:If the media and the profiteers of BIG government are in hysterics, the prez must be doing a good job.
Carry on.
I hope you are able to sleep at night.
History doesn't look too kindly on those who defend fascist governments.QuakerOats;1835918 wrote:If the media and the profiteers of BIG government are in hysterics, the prez must be doing a good job.
Carry on.
The fix is easy. Single payer healthcare. That is the only option for reduced costs while maintaining high levels of care.Azubuike24;1835922 wrote:Obamacare didn't really help that many people. Federal allocation increases to Medicaid did. As for repealing Obamacare, it's hard to support something that forces you to have insurance (or pay a penalty) so everyone can have it. There's also zero focus on prevention, in-fact, it's shunned in today's industry. Hundreds of millions of people eat themselves into obesity, Diabetes and other chronic and preventable issues...for which we could easily provide insurance for everyone if we cut down on this expense.
Health care costs for obesity are 150 billion dollars or more. How ridiculous is it that we're fighting over something with such an obvious solution. Sleeper, being that you are logical, it's hard to really call Obamacare a partisan issue. It's not. The fact is, we're fighting over the wrong thing entirely.
Whoaaaaa ... pump the brakes.sleeper;1835914 wrote:So because the media is fairly and accurately reporting our President, good or bad ...
Just because one is bad, that doesn't mean the other is okay.majorspark;1835916 wrote:Putin's methods work much better. Botched muggings where the muggee gets dead or a fresh salad from his Chernobyl garden.
There are an awful lot of "snowflakes" in the GOP (and certainly plenty in the Democratic Party). You get in line or you're suddenly part of the problem.sleeper;1835917 wrote:Where have all the decent Republicans went? Where are their spines? Absolutely horrifying that Trump gets any support at all in this country.
Normal. It feels normal. Like every other fucking election.sleeper;1835920 wrote:How does it feel to be lied to?
You bitch about the GOP and abortion, yet you want them to have complete control of our healthcare? Great idea [emoji108].sleeper;1835924 wrote:The fix is easy. Single payer healthcare. That is the only option for reduced costs while maintaining high levels of care.
I think that if you took those who are simply blindly partisan out of the equation, this sentiment you were responding too is probably my biggest pet peeve when it comes to political commentary, especially since it almost always seems to come from people who you'd think be intelligent to know better (I mean, I don't know Major, but he can type proper, grammatically accurate, complete sentences at least). The simple concept of essentially saying, "No point in complaining about this when things are handled worse in other parts of the world?" is just dumb as hell. If something is wrong, something is wrong. The fact that in some other country, people are doing things that are more wrong is irrelevant.O-Trap;1835926 wrote:Just because one is bad, that doesn't mean the other is okay.
In general, it seems like if we didn't allocate so much relevant power to any office or entity, we wouldn't have to lose our fucking minds about the wrong person being elected to that office/committee/etc.like_that;1835927 wrote:You bitch about the GOP and abortion, yet you want them to have complete control of our healthcare? Great idea [emoji108].
With our constant two-party supermajority, it seems like the #1 logical fallacy in politics is the false dilemma.Heretic;1835929 wrote:I think that if you took those who are simply blindly partisan out of the equation, this sentiment you were responding too is probably my biggest pet peeve when it comes to political commentary, especially since it almost always seems to come from people who you'd think be intelligent to know better (I mean, I don't know Major, but he can type proper, grammatically accurate, complete sentences at least). The simple concept of essentially saying, "No point in complaining about this when things are handled worse in other parts of the world?" is just dumb as hell. If something is wrong, something is wrong. The fact that in some other country, people are doing things that are more wrong is irrelevant.
True. I guess it's more a matter of combating that sort of weak logic...or magnifying it. "Why bother with a wall or vetting/banning refugees? It's not like we're as bad off as Syria, are we?!?!?"O-Trap;1835931 wrote:With our constant two-party supermajority, it seems like the #1 logical fallacy in politics is the false dilemma.
However, because we're also all fucking children about politics, I'm sure ad hominem isn't far behind.
Perfect example.Heretic;1835933 wrote:True. I guess it's more a matter of combating that sort of weak logic...or magnifying it. "Why bother with a wall or vetting/banning refugees? It's not like we're as bad off as Syria, are we?!?!?"
Pretty much. Everyone is freaking out about DeVos and I am just sitting here thinking the Dept of EDU shouldn't exist or at the very least shouldn't have a $73B budget. Then again, I feel this way about many departments and agencies.O-Trap;1835930 wrote:In general, it seems like if we didn't allocate so much relevant power to any office or entity, we wouldn't have to lose our fucking minds about the wrong person being elected to that office/committee/etc.
Hell, maybe even ... *gasp* ... the President of the United States.like_that;1835944 wrote:Pretty much. Everyone is freaking out about DeVos and I am just sitting here thinking the Dept of EDU shouldn't exist or at the very least shouldn't have a $73B budget. Then again, I feel this way about many departments and agencies.
O-Trap;1835926 wrote:Just because one is bad, that doesn't mean the other is okay.
Guys look at the poster my comment was directed. His new troll act has included some outrageous conclusions. Posts in the context of the ascension of a totalitarian dictator in the USA with the evil intent of past 20th century rulers. My comment was mocking in nature in that context. As were other comments I made recently in that same context mentioning cattle cars for immigrants and labor camps in ANWAR.Heretic;1835929 wrote:I think that if you took those who are simply blindly partisan out of the equation, this sentiment you were responding too is probably my biggest pet peeve when it comes to political commentary, especially since it almost always seems to come from people who you'd think be intelligent to know better (I mean, I don't know Major, but he can type proper, grammatically accurate, complete sentences at least). The simple concept of essentially saying, "No point in complaining about this when things are handled worse in other parts of the world?" is just dumb as hell. If something is wrong, something is wrong. The fact that in some other country, people are doing things that are more wrong is irrelevant.
Lol, I actually would like to see you elaborate on this.O-Trap;1835945 wrote:Hell, maybe even ... *gasp* ... the President of the United States.
sleeper;1835924 wrote:The fix is easy. Single payer healthcare. That is the only option for reduced costs while maintaining high levels of care.
Except we already see successful single payer models across the world which spend far less per citizen than that of healthcare in the States.QuakerOats;1835998 wrote:Except the exact opposite would occur.
listensleeper;1836003 wrote:Except we already see successful single payer models across the world which spend far less per citizen than that of healthcare in the States.
Facts don't care about your feelings.
Listen, facts don't care about your feelings. You already pay for the people who don't work in a privatized medical system but you pay for them at the highest cost(no preventative medicine, only treated at emergency rooms, etc). Maybe if these people had the ability to go to the doctor for regular checkups they would be LESS costly!Spock;1836005 wrote:listen
Single payer in this country is not the same as some other countries. there are 300 million people here. The single payer system in a country like Holland where there are 4 million people wont work here.
Spoken like someone who might care about alleviating present-day infanticide.sleeper;1836008 wrote:Let me repeat that; you are already paying for them! Right now! And it will always be this way
unless you advocate for mass genocide against people who can't afford healthcare.