The retard who didn't catch the obvious sarcasm or the sarcasm reference in the post is calling other people brain dead. That's cute.thavoice;1811933 wrote:No idea what Kappa means...but still many people do wonder why they just dont shoot a leg/arm!
BTW--
You ever get tired of owning those browns fans? Man, I thought just their leadership was brain dead but geesh...
She is doing well. Thanks for asking.SportsAndLady;1811937 wrote:The retard who didn't catch the obvious sarcasm or the sarcasm reference in the post is calling other people brain dead. That's cute.
How's your wife? Still a complete bitch?
Nope. Not according to BLM and the liberals. Cops are racist and you should be able to do whatever you want with no consequences. That is the world in which Zwick wants to live in; lawless society.vball10set;1811939 wrote:http://www.toledoblade.com/Police-Fire/2016/09/21/Protests-over-Charlotte-police-shooting-move-to-highway.html
warn once, warn twice, then shoot...when a cop says 'put your hands up' or 'put the gun down', do it--or pay the consequences.
Then we are already there. Less than 1,000 people will be killed by cops this year out of millions and millions of police interactions that will occur peacefully and legally. Of those 1,000, a smaller percent will be unjustly killed and their families will win a wrongful death lawsuit.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1811960 wrote:Yes, I would prefer to not get killed by police when you're not presenting a danger to their life. You fucking retard lol.
There's a bit of a difference from a lightening strike and a person in authority killing another human being. Nice analogy though, dipshit.sleeper;1811961 wrote:Then we are already there. Less than 1,000 people will be killed by cops this year out of millions and millions of police interactions that will occur peacefully and legally. Of those 1,000, a smaller percent will be unjustly killed and their families will win a wrongful death lawsuit.
Your position is basically saying "I'd like to live in a world where lightening doesn't kill anyone"; maybe its time to grow up and stand up to the manipulation from narratives and identity politics. Grow up dude.
You don't get it and you obviously don't have the intelligence to ever get it. Enjoy being poor and stupid!ZWICK 4 PREZ;1811963 wrote:There's a bit of a difference from a lightening strike and a person in authority killing another human being. Nice analogy though, dipshit.
Yeah I'm the one who doesn't get it. Fuck off with your hot takes sleeper.sleeper;1811964 wrote:You don't get it and you obviously don't have the intelligence to ever get it. Enjoy being poor and stupid!
Then listen to the police. You don't get shot of you obey police. The recent shootings will all be justified.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1811960 wrote:Yes, I would prefer to not get killed by police when you're not presenting a danger to their life. You fucking retard lol.
Deadly force has nothing to do with disobeying police. Well it does, apparently, but it's not supposed to. You don't take someone's life unless yours or the public is in immediate danger. I don't give a fuck about your ego.Spock;1811969 wrote:Then listen to the police. You don't get shot of you obey police. The recent shootings will all be justified.
Yeah I sure want to agree with BLM supporters. Cream of the crop right there!ZWICK 4 PREZ;1811965 wrote:Yeah I'm the one who doesn't get it. Fuck off with your hot takes sleeper.
Yeah it rarely happens. Let's all be outraged because .00000000000001% of police interactions aren't perfect.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1811970 wrote:Deadly force has nothing to do with disobeying police. Well it does, apparently, but it's not supposed to. You don't take someone's life unless yours or the public is in immediate danger. I don't give a fuck about your ego.
moar hot taeks!sleeper;1811975 wrote:Yeah it rarely happens. Let's all be outraged because .00000000000001% of police interactions aren't perfect.
Muh narrative!
Do you have any statistics that prove your narrative to be accurate?ZWICK 4 PREZ;1811976 wrote:moar hot taeks!
please continue on to fucking off like you were told earlier.
Yeah dude! It's 00000000000001%.like_that;1811977 wrote:Do you have any statistics that prove your narrative to be accurate?
sleeper;1811917 wrote:Also, cut the shit with the tazer gun being a viable option. It rarely is and that's reality instead of the fantasy land BLM lives in.
Even if you use a tazer, people are still going to scream POLICE BRUTALITY, WHY USE A TAZER WHEN THEY HUG HIM WITH PILLOWS>!?@>#
+1.Heretic;1811925 wrote:Lol.
What do you mean "for once"? Conservatively-inclined folks have been bringing up family structure since at least the 1960's. It is brought up in literally every discussion and every talking head back-and-forth when it comes to urban poverty, crime, etc.like_that;1811113 wrote:For starters, if you want to have a "discussion" try bringing up family structure for once.
Good luck changing this. The whole point of moving to Dublin from Columbus proper is to move your precious children away from teh p00rz in Columbus Public and make sure your tax dollars fund a nice school district.FatHobbit;1811115 wrote:I can agree with that.
I also can't believe that we continue to find schools with property taxes, which leads to less funding in poor districts. That was determined to be unconstitutional a while ago but nobody cares to fix it apparently
One Man's Opinion that I found persuasive back in the day. Heavily influenced the creator of The Wire.like_that;1811218 wrote:Do you have anything that proves this?
Regardless, that still doesn't explain why 70% of households are fatherless and lack the family structure with a focus on discipline and education. Nobody is forcing these fathers to commit these crimes and wind up in jail...
Wilson, one of our foremost authorities on race and poverty, challenges decades of liberal and conservative pieties to look squarely at the devastating effects that joblessness has had on our urban ghettos. Marshaling a vast array of data and the personal stories of hundreds of men and women, Wilson persuasively argues that problems endemic to America's inner cities--from fatherless households to drugs and violent crime--stem directly from the disappearance of blue-collar jobs in the wake of a globalized economy.
While you'll never hear it really put this way I think the point is more subtle than a claim of a nationwide conspiracy. They see instances wherein young boys of color (just an example) are getting killed in their neighborhoods. Even if we accept that the boys bring this on themselves in a way by pointing the guns at cops, the broader thought is that somebody like me grew up in an all white suburb with real guns, toy guns and big yards to play in and point our toy guns around with no pervasive police presence.iclfan2;1811225 wrote:This is my main issue with the Kaepernick, BLM, etc. It is borderline retarded to think that there is a nationwide conspiracy to jail black people, even among black cops. OR the reality is that most crimes happen in the same neighborhoods, are then policed more, and more crime is caught. Derp. Then people complain about police, they stop actively policing, and you end up with Chicago. More derp.
That's not true. You just have to talk about it with a little empathy and understanding and refrain from lecturing black people about voting democrat, black crime rate, black families, etc. and all other generalities lol.Azubuike24;1811239 wrote:As a middle class, white male, who has done quite well for himself, it's frustrating because there's almost no possible way to take an opposing side or have an articulated discussion about this topic without being called a racist.
It's a chicken and egg scenario, and instead of looking at both sides that are contributing to these outcomes, we just keep hammering the other side even harder.
:RpS_blink:SportsAndLady;1811844 wrote: Just because it was only a misdemeanor doesn't mean he couldn't have committed a felony.