QuakerOats;1807704 wrote:You must like that authority bs ....... your new talking point.
I am voting for Trump, and I hate authority, especially federal authority emanaing from marxist officials. I guess I am must be in the stupid redneck group then.
It's hardly new. Phrased differently, perhaps, and now statistically supported, but hardly new.
As for how much you hate authority, I'd be curious in what ways you differ from the traditional Republican authoritarian. The two main parties talk a good game about freedoms, but they each tend to have their special hobby horses.
- Foreign military intervention is authoritarian. Do you support our involvement overseas subjecting other nations and their citizenry to our authority?
- Placing the burden of proof on a suspect to prove innocence instead of law enforcement and the courts to prove guilt is authoritarian. Do you support police being allowed to monitor without a warrant? Stop and frisk? Law enforcement militarization? Do you default to siding with the officer for shooting a suspect without any physical evidence to suggest the suspect was a threat?
- Racial or religious profiling is not only authoritarian, but unconstitutional, as well. Do you support any of Trump's articulated policies regarding legal immigrants or visa holders from the Middle East or who may practice the Muslim faith?
- Monitoring, restricting, or criminalizing private consumption of anything is authoritarian. Do you support laws against recreational drug use?
- Dictating the legal agreement we call "marriage" by controlling which consenting adults may enter into it is authoritarian. Do/Did you support the legal defining of marriage as only able to take place between a man and a woman?
- Forcing one person to subject their body for the use of another against their will is authoritarian. Do you support a woman's right to decide whether or not a fetus is permitted to use her body?
Or are we just talking about taxes?
QuakerOats;1807722 wrote:[...] defenders of the Constitution
Yeah, except that whole 'freedom of religion' silliness. That's just nonsense, and we shouldn't let that get in the way of some good ol'-fashioned rounding up and deportation of those Muslims.
QuakerOats;1807722 wrote:effective in defending The People
Which people? All the people? Only the majority of the people? Only a portion of the people?
QuakerOats;1807722 wrote:[...] and supportive of economic policy that allowed for growth and opportunity.
Like, for example, allowing companies to look overseas for competitive partners, even if it means American jobs are lost?
FatHobbit;1807726 wrote:Too many people treat politics like sports. My team won, your team lost. Goooooooooooooo team
That or horse races. "I picked the winner! What's my prize?"