QuakerOats;1811021 wrote:Thank you. Unfortunately some of the younger progressives here have little understanding of the long-term implications of liberal courts; not just the supremes, but all federal benches and appeals courts. They have the power to literally overturn the voices of the States -- so you better have judges that are restrained and do not legislate from the bench. Trump will nominate/appoint those who will not legislate from the bench; Clinton will nominate/appoint radical leftists who will continue to impose their cultural Marixism upon The People, regardless of what elected legislatures do. Very, very stark difference here, and one with effects that last decades or more.

QuakerOats;1810926 wrote:That would be huge, I mean bigly.

If Trump wins PA, he will win the election.

QuakerOats;1810936 wrote:Simply not even close to being true.

Trump would nominate conservatives to the supreme court and appoint relatively conservative federal judges across the country; Clinton would not.

Trump would sign the bill repealing obamaKare; Clinton would not.

Trump would sign the bill lowering corporate tax rates to 15%; Clinton would not.

Trump would implement the regulatory moratorium; Clinton would not.

Trump would limit the flow of illegal aliens; Clinton would not, in fact she would keep the borders open and give them a vote.

Trump would strengthen the military; Clinton would not.

Trump would stand with the police; Clinton would not.

Trump would not be politically correct; Clinton would expand cultural Marxism.


And on and on and on ......................




Mind boggling to think that other-wise intelligent people could hand her the keys, when we have a chance to turn the ship around.

QuakerOats;1810997 wrote:That is simply ludicrous. The most important issues we face as a nation, and you shirk them off. No wonder this country is tanking.

sleeper;1810939 wrote:None of those are a big enough concern to vote Donald Trump as President. He is a national embarrassment at best and has no business being President.

BoatShoes;1811126 wrote:Like Heller overturned the states and citizens united overruled the congress. Oh wait you don't mind those acts of judicial review because DERP!

BoatShoes;1811131 wrote:I mean a guy like Colin Powell sums it up...nails Hillary's flaws (hubris, greed, etc.) admits voting for her would have to be done with nose firmly pinched but acknowledges she is a friend, hard worker and respected while Trump is an insane embarassment.

The GOP has nobody to blame but themselves. For fucks sake I think Romney/Ryan beats Hillary/Kaine but they nominated DONALD FUCKING TRUMP.

superman;1811133 wrote:Which state did Heller overturn?

HitsRus;1811134 wrote:Second statement is True.....but the first assertion that Trump is insane/embarrassment is hyperbole and speculation...you have no proof of anything other than he appears to be an insensitive boor.

queencitybuckeye;1811119 wrote:No,if there are 5 liberals, we would need one of them to join the 4 conservatives to leave it in place.

GOONx19;1811145 wrote:If you live in New Orleans and all signs point to a hurricane, with plenty of time to get out of the city, do you get out of the city or wait until your car is underwater?

If you come to my hospital with a raging fever, leukocytosis, and elevated inflammatory markers, do you want antibiotics now or would you rather wait until your blood culture comes back positive for MRSA?

Why the hell do you need proof that a bird looking like a duck and acting like a duck is a duck if that means you've got a fucking duck shitting in your living room for the next four years?

BoatShoes;1811128 wrote:What chain email did you pull this from? Or, did you really just drop "cultural marxism" - a personal fave from the alt-right nazi trumpkins.

BoatShoes;1811129 wrote:The country is not tanking. Hope that helps.

QuakerOats;1811158 wrote:When you can't see beyond the next cocktail party, it is understandable how you might think that.

bases_loaded;1811184 wrote:http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/09/16/got-played-cnn-reacts-trump-birther-troll/

Baller

gut;1811186 wrote:That is hilarious. He basically just got for free advertising and publicity (promoting the veteran support) that would have cost millions to run on tv.

Really kind of a marvel how easily and effectively he manipulates the press while being essentially completely transparent (as opposed to most politicians).

isadore;1811187 wrote:gosh a ruddies, Donald Mussolini had to finally give up on the birther lie that got him started. And he shot down a favorite myth of bigoted backers.
Two-thirds of voters with a favorable opinion of Donald Trump believe President Barack Obama is a Muslim' The Public Policy Polling survey showed 59 percent of those who said they viewed the presumptive Republican presidential nominee favorably think Obama was not born in the United States and only 13 percent believe he’s a Christian.
http://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/poll-two-thirds-trump-supporters-think-obama-muslim

These people are deplorable.

bases_loaded;1811184 wrote:http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/09/16/got-played-cnn-reacts-trump-birther-troll/

Baller