Trump vs. Hillary (NO OTHER OPTIONS)

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Politics ▸ Trump vs. Hillary (NO OTHER OPTIONS)
MontyBrunswick's avatar

MontyBrunswick

Senior Member

846 posts
decades of experience vs no experience

Hillary...........
Jun 15, 2016 11:48am
O-Trap's avatar

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

14,994 posts
MontyBrunswick;1799651 wrote:decades of experience vs no experience

Hillary...........
Her experience doesn't hit decades until 2021 unless you count her years in the "Wife of the President" position.
Jun 16, 2016 2:07am
G

gut

Senior Member

15,058 posts
O-Trap;1799729 wrote:Her experience doesn't hit decades until 2021 unless you count her years in the "Wife of the President" position.
To be fair, that's the only time she accomplished anything
Jun 16, 2016 2:30am
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
MontyBrunswick;1799651 wrote:decades of experience vs no experience

Hillary...........

Decades of experience obstructing justice, laundering money, peddling influence, being negligent in office, and serial lying.

VS.

"No experience", despite building up multi-billion dollar businesses worldwide, and now calling out the political shills, hacks and the corrupted for putting America in the dire straits it is in.


Only a moron or someone on the take would vote for Hillary.
Jun 16, 2016 10:10am
O-Trap's avatar

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

14,994 posts
gut;1799730 wrote:To be fair, that's the only time she accomplished anything
Rep'd
Jun 16, 2016 1:07pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Good, maybe they better re-think everything that has led to global insecurity and the rise of terrorism.
Jun 16, 2016 2:47pm
CenterBHSFan's avatar

CenterBHSFan

333 - I'm only half evil

6,115 posts
ptown_trojans_1;1799800 wrote:Then Richard Armitage is a moron
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/richard-armitage-endorses-clinton-224431

The R National Security establishment is running away from Trump.
It's not like the average person gives a damn about Richard Armitage. He's not exactly a litmus test for anybody who goes to vote.
Jun 17, 2016 5:11am
Q

queencitybuckeye

Senior Member

7,117 posts
Saw a pretty good description of the two from someone from (I think) the National Review, didn't catch his name. He said Hillary's lies are planned and practiced (you know they're lies and you basically can predict what's coming), while Trump lies like someone with Tourette's, you and possibly he has no idea what lie he's going to spew from moment to moment.
Jun 17, 2016 10:13am
W

Wolves of Babylon

Senior Member

408 posts
Anyone think Trump actually has a chance barring FBI indictment or will it be largest landslide in history?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
Jun 21, 2016 12:59pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
I have no idea what to think, but I have heard a lot of people who say Trump will win a landslide. It is just all over the place.
Jun 21, 2016 3:07pm
Automatik's avatar

Automatik

Senior Member

14,632 posts
Wolves of Babylon;1801010 wrote:Anyone think Trump actually has a chance barring FBI indictment or will it be largest landslide in history?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
I predict a record low voter turnout and a significant victory for Clinton.
Jun 21, 2016 3:15pm
O-Trap's avatar

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

14,994 posts
Wolves of Babylon;1801010 wrote:Anyone think Trump actually has a chance barring FBI indictment or will it be largest landslide in history?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk
I think this underestimates the bumpkins and rednecks who might turn out to vote.
Jun 21, 2016 6:31pm
Spock's avatar

Spock

Senior Member

2,853 posts
If you listen to the media and how they are talking about the whole rebublican party....Trump has no chance. Cross your fingers and hope the FBI perp walks Hiliary in hand cuffs.
Jun 22, 2016 12:10pm
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
QuakerOats;1801041 wrote:I have no idea what to think, but I have heard a lot of people who say Trump will win a landslide. It is just all over the place.
Who are those people and what's their cred?

Looking at the polling average, it certainly does not look good for Trump.
Still, that could change over the summer.

The more I think about, the more I think the map largely changes. It is possible Trump can take Ohio, Penn, and FL, but lose VA and Utah, and AZ and Clinton still wins.
Jun 22, 2016 2:35pm
CenterBHSFan's avatar

CenterBHSFan

333 - I'm only half evil

6,115 posts
O-Trap;1801072 wrote:I think this underestimates the bumpkins and rednecks who might turn out to vote.
In a way, this is correct only if you live in a larger city/area.

I live in a more rural type of area and - since AFL-CIO officially endorsed Hillary, the union people that I personally have talked to (and there's a huge amount in my area, although that is dwindling rapidly) are pissed off about it and scratching their heads. They see their union as biting their own asses with this and don't like it one bit.
So, I think that even if you get the headliners throwing their names into a bucket, it doesn't mean that the rank and file are walking instep with them.
Jun 22, 2016 2:38pm
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
Not that it matters to this crowd, but the national security experts keep endorsing Clinton.
Brent Scrowcoft, is seen by many as the best National Security Adviser in recent history under HW Bush.
This is a big one in the foreign policy circles, and could lead to a tidal wave of endorsements.
More evidence that Trump's foreign policy is such a break from everything we have set up since 1945.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/brent-scowcroft-endorses-hillary-clinton-224677
Jun 22, 2016 3:33pm
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
like_that;1801209 wrote:Can you come off any more of a pretentious douche? Get over yourself, she is a shitty ass candidate.
He is worse. That is the point.
Jun 22, 2016 3:36pm
Belly35's avatar

Belly35

Elderly Intellectual

9,716 posts
ptown_trojans_1;1801208 wrote:Not that it matters to this crowd, but the national security experts keep endorsing Clinton.
Brent Scrowcoft, is seen by many as the best National Security Adviser in recent history under HW Bush.
This is a big one in the foreign policy circles, and could lead to a tidal wave of endorsements.
More evidence that Trump's foreign policy is such a break from everything we have set up since 1945.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/brent-scowcroft-endorses-hillary-clinton-224677
i don't give a fuck who they support .. I care about 4 dead soldiers, stand down order and the sec of State asleep at her job and a dept of incompetent career asshole blaming a video .... No thanks Hillary. I'll take Trump over that type of leadership.
My code of ethic is never leave anyone behind... You failed at Sec of State no second chances those soldiers did get their support you don't get mine...
Jun 22, 2016 4:41pm
C

Con_Alma

Senior Member

12,198 posts
ptown_trojans_1;1801208 wrote:Not that it matters to this crowd, but the national security experts keep endorsing Clinton.
Brent Scrowcoft, is seen by many as the best National Security Adviser in recent history under HW Bush.
This is a big one in the foreign policy circles, and could lead to a tidal wave of endorsements.
More evidence that Trump's foreign policy is such a break from everything we have set up since 1945.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/brent-scowcroft-endorses-hillary-clinton-224677

Agreed. It doesn't matter...nor should it.
Jun 22, 2016 4:59pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Heard Trump delivered a hell of a speech today; will have to find it later......Cavs ruled today.
Jun 22, 2016 5:08pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
ptown_trojans_1;1801210 wrote:He is worse. That is the point.
And the point of why people are voting AGAINST Hillary has either gone over your head 100 times now, or you choose to pretend you are smarter than everyone else and remain stubborn.
Jun 22, 2016 5:38pm
O-Trap's avatar

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

14,994 posts
ptown_trojans_1;1801208 wrote:Not that it matters to this crowd, but the national security experts keep endorsing Clinton.
Brent Scrowcoft, is seen by many as the best National Security Adviser in recent history under HW Bush.
This is a big one in the foreign policy circles, and could lead to a tidal wave of endorsements.
More evidence that Trump's foreign policy is such a break from everything we have set up since 1945.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/brent-scowcroft-endorses-hillary-clinton-224677
It matters, but it might not be positive. All this really means, it would seem, is that their ideology involving US involvement in other countries is closer.

Based on our foreign policy over the last few decades, that doesn't inspire confidence.

Not to suggest that they are incompetent. They're not. Just that all this really means is that their ideologies align more closely, and that there are plenty of Americans that would see this as a strike against Clinton.
Jun 22, 2016 6:17pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
ptown_trojans_1;1801210 wrote:He is worse. That is the point.
This.
Jun 22, 2016 6:38pm