Terrorist with a Checkbook in America

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Serious Business ▸ Terrorist with a Checkbook in America
Belly35's avatar

Belly35

Elderly Intellectual

9,716 posts
Dec 8, 2015 12:50 PM
The beginning of a new page of terrorists in America

The idea that we in America are immune from terrorist attach has just gone out the window. Will we see large volume of armed, tactical gear and rpg wheedling individuals attacking unarmed civilian location ….. no

Here is what will develop: American (small) base individuals radical Islam, ISIS supporters, radical Islam teaching youth sub groups, anti Christian and etc hate groups will want to capitalize on the Terrorist ISIS Check Book … “killing for profit the Islam/ISIS way”.

What we will see now in America is radical individual attacks of violence, more killing of police, innocent individual via sniper, soft target quick hits, increase in drive by shooting all in the name of Islam or ISIS hoping for the Web Cash Cow … “ Killing For Profit the Islam/ISIS Way” .

Which the political left knee jerk reaction will be “ Gun Control “ missing the mark and the real target… Terrorist, ISIS and Radical Islam is real and the American people thank you for your incompetence.

ISIS Check Book just entered the game in America…

Get your head out of your ass Politicians/American People …. This is a war and there is no room for PC.
Dec 8, 2015 12:50pm
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
Dec 8, 2015 1:03 PM
Hmmm. i heard all this before...shortly after 9/11.
Take a chill pill.
Dec 8, 2015 1:03pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Dec 8, 2015 1:22 PM
ptown_trojans_1;1768296 wrote:Take a chill pill.

Sincerely,

barack obama
Dec 8, 2015 1:22pm
Automatik's avatar

Automatik

Senior Member

14,632 posts
Dec 8, 2015 1:29 PM
On behalf of the 5,705 members (24 active). We thank you.
Dec 8, 2015 1:29pm
Belly35's avatar

Belly35

Elderly Intellectual

9,716 posts
Dec 8, 2015 3:31 PM
ptown_trojans_1;1768296 wrote:Hmmm. i heard all this before...shortly after 9/11.
Take a chill pill.
Heard it ... yes but now we see it Web Deposit and once again people like you ( I respect many things you comment on PT1) your head goes back into sand with no solution suggested or foresight of problem.The Federal Governments job is to prevent a invasion ... they have failed. There is a problem and it going to boil over unless we take the pc out of the war and fight it now. Witch we should have been fight long ago to get a handle on this before 9/11and strong after 9/11
Dec 8, 2015 3:31pm
S

sportchampps

Senior Member

7,361 posts
Dec 8, 2015 5:15 PM
I actually think Belly is right on this one. I don't expect weekly or monthly attacks but I do expect attacks to happen each year. We won't be able to stop all the local cells or lone nut job that pledges loyalty to ISIS. The difference between now and 9/11 is ISIS has mastered using social media to recruit and brainwash individuals. You can read reports where people have went from your everyday normal citizens to willing suicide bombers in 6 or less months.
Dec 8, 2015 5:15pm
MontyBrunswick's avatar

MontyBrunswick

Senior Member

846 posts
Dec 9, 2015 9:15 AM
Belly35;1768294 wrote: This is a war and there is no room for PC.
I have a tablet, lol
Dec 9, 2015 9:15am
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Dec 9, 2015 9:31 AM
Do we take another chill pill after they detonate a dirty bomb?
Dec 9, 2015 9:31am
ernest_t_bass's avatar

ernest_t_bass

12th Son of the Lama

24,984 posts
Dec 9, 2015 10:29 AM
ptown_trojans_1;1768296 wrote:Hmmm. i heard all this before...shortly after 9/11.
Take a chill pill.
100% this (below), IMO. "Move along, nothing to see here." Why does he have such a problem calling a spade a spade?
QuakerOats;1768303 wrote:Sincerely,

barack obama
Dec 9, 2015 10:29am
Uz2Bon36's avatar

Uz2Bon36

Banned

1,135 posts
Dec 9, 2015 10:40 AM
Belly35;1768294 wrote:The beginning of a new page of terrorists in America

The idea that we in America are immune from terrorist attach has just gone out the window. Will we see large volume of armed, tactical gear and rpg wheedling individuals attacking unarmed civilian location ….. no

Here is what will develop: American (small) base individuals radical Islam, ISIS supporters, radical Islam teaching youth sub groups, anti Christian and etc hate groups will want to capitalize on the Terrorist ISIS Check Book … “killing for profit the Islam/ISIS way”.

What we will see now in America is radical individual attacks of violence, more killing of police, innocent individual via sniper, soft target quick hits, increase in drive by shooting all in the name of Islam or ISIS hoping for the Web Cash Cow … “ Killing For Profit the Islam/ISIS Way” .

Which the political left knee jerk reaction will be “ Gun Control “ missing the mark and the real target… Terrorist, ISIS and Radical Islam is real and the American people thank you for your incompetence.

ISIS Check Book just entered the game in America…

Get your head out of your ass Politicians/American People …. This is a war and there is no room for PC.
Any proof?
Dec 9, 2015 10:40am
Uz2Bon36's avatar

Uz2Bon36

Banned

1,135 posts
Dec 9, 2015 10:41 AM
Belly35;1768328 wrote: with no solution suggested
What is Belly's solution?
Dec 9, 2015 10:41am
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
Dec 9, 2015 11:00 AM
Belly35;1768328 wrote:Heard it ... yes but now we see it Web Deposit and once again people like you ( I respect many things you comment on PT1) your head goes back into sand with no solution suggested or foresight of problem.The Federal Governments job is to prevent a invasion ... they have failed. There is a problem and it going to boil over unless we take the pc out of the war and fight it now. Witch we should have been fight long ago to get a handle on this before 9/11and strong after 9/11
QuakerOats;1768390 wrote:Do we take another chill pill after they detonate a dirty bomb?
ernest_t_bass;1768404 wrote:100% this (below), IMO. "Move along, nothing to see here." Why does he have such a problem calling a spade a spade?
It is like you guys think that the security structure set up to focus on these issues after 9/11 just vanished. Head in the sand, no. It is just we have been focusing on things like terror attacks and dirty bombs since 9/11.
Do you guys even know what we are doing now to stop dirty bombs, or have been doing? Do you guys even know the agency? The office in the agency?
Get a clue guys.
Dec 9, 2015 11:00am
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Dec 9, 2015 11:04 AM
ptown_trojans_1;1768420 wrote: Do you guys even know what we are doing now to stop dirty bombs, or have been doing? Do you guys even know the agency? The office in the agency?
Get a clue guys.
It's much easier for Quaker and the like to make loud, ignorant "DIRTY BOMBS, DIRTY BOMBS, DIRTY BOMBS!!!111!!" comments than to take the time to actually understand all of the work our country puts in to thwart attacks.
Dec 9, 2015 11:04am
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Dec 9, 2015 11:15 AM
I appreciate all the good work that has gone into thwarting any and all terrorist attacks on the homeland. I am not the one who made the flippant comment, "take a chill pill". I did suggest that if a dirty bomb had been detonated by these latest terrorists, perhaps most would now be thinking along the lines of Trump. Do we wait until it happens before we get a grip on our borders, illegal aliens, and terrorists posing as refugees? All legitimate questions and concerns, yet hardly confronted by the progressives here and elsewhere.
Dec 9, 2015 11:15am
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Dec 9, 2015 11:20 AM
QuakerOats;1768427 wrote: Do we wait until it happens
We've waited since September 11, 2001 for it to happen so it's obvious you're just fear-mongering as it pertains to dirty bombs.
Dec 9, 2015 11:20am
majorspark's avatar

majorspark

Senior Member

5,122 posts
Dec 9, 2015 11:42 AM
I don't think a dirty bomb would be a weapon of choice for terrorists. Their objective is to kill as many civilians as they can. Dispersing enough radiation over a large area at high enough levels to kill people in any numbers from my understanding just isn't going to happen with this type of crude device. It would succeed in inducing an immediate large amount of panic among the population and depending on the area hit could have some short term impact on economic activity. Personally I don't think there is a whole lot to fear when it comes to dirty bombs.
Dec 9, 2015 11:42am
FatHobbit's avatar

FatHobbit

Senior Member

8,651 posts
Dec 9, 2015 12:23 PM
I'm all for whatever Belly proposes, as long as we can send those dirty fucking Irish back where they came from.
Dec 9, 2015 12:23pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Dec 9, 2015 12:26 PM
I wonder how much ptown gets paid by the WH. He is quite the spin machine with a nice dose of "I know more than you."
Dec 9, 2015 12:26pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Dec 9, 2015 1:30 PM
QuakerOats;1768427 wrote:I appreciate all the good work that has gone into thwarting any and all terrorist attacks on the homeland. I am not the one who made the flippant comment, "take a chill pill". I did suggest that if a dirty bomb had been detonated by these latest terrorists, perhaps most would now be thinking along the lines of Trump. Do we wait until it happens before we get a grip on our borders, illegal aliens, and terrorists posing as refugees? All legitimate questions and concerns, yet hardly confronted by the progressives here and elsewhere.

I'm not fear-mongering. I simply said if these terrorists had detonated a dirty bomb would a majority of citizens be lined up with Trump's position? You did not, or can not answer the question.

Now, in 1980, where were all of you when Jimmy Carter banned Iranians from entering the U.S. Or is that off-limits since he was a democrat.
Dec 9, 2015 1:30pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Dec 9, 2015 1:33 PM
QuakerOats;1768462 wrote:if these terrorists had detonated a dirty bomb would a majority of citizens be lined up with Trump?

If the majority of the citizens are as much of paranoid fear-mongerers as you and Belly, then yes, a majority of the citizens would be lined up with Trump, just like you two are now.


The fact you're aligned with him at all, even prior to any truly catastrophic event, shows exactly how big of a paranoid fear-mongerer you are because Trump's viewpoints on the subject are absolutely asinine.
Dec 9, 2015 1:33pm
MontyBrunswick's avatar

MontyBrunswick

Senior Member

846 posts
Dec 9, 2015 1:34 PM
Uz2Bon36;1768409 wrote:What is Belly's solution?
to make non-sensical threads on the chatter
Dec 9, 2015 1:34pm
FatHobbit's avatar

FatHobbit

Senior Member

8,651 posts
Dec 9, 2015 1:47 PM
QuakerOats;1768462 wrote: Now, in 1980, where were all of you when Jimmy Carter banned Iranians from entering the U.S. Or is that off-limits since he was a democrat.
There is a difference between banning people who are from a country you oppose and banning people because they belong to the same religion as people you oppose. I'm guessing nobody opposes banning members of isis from the US. Where I have an issue is when you ban all Muslims.
Dec 9, 2015 1:47pm
FatHobbit's avatar

FatHobbit

Senior Member

8,651 posts
Dec 9, 2015 1:49 PM
I'm just curious. If there are Syrian Christians fleeing from isis, should we let them in or do they need to stay in Syria to be slaughtered?
Dec 9, 2015 1:49pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Dec 9, 2015 1:58 PM
FatHobbit;1768471 wrote:I'm just curious. If there are Syrian Christians fleeing from isis, should we let them in or do they need to stay in Syria to be slaughtered?
The % of Christians in the Syrian refugee mix is .4%; yes, less than one-half of one percent.
Dec 9, 2015 1:58pm