Archive 2016 Browns Season Thread

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Sep 19, 2016 7:01pm

like_that;1811708 wrote:Me too, doesn't mean I can't talk about our future QB.

I just meant players like wentz, bortles come on late in the process.

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Sep 19, 2016 7:05pm

Commander of Awesome;1811709 wrote:I just meant players like wentz, bortles come on late in the process.

True, but bortles name was discussed his entire final college season.

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Sep 19, 2016 7:05pm

like_that;1811710 wrote:True, but bortles name was discussed his entire final college season.

As a top 3 pick? Didn't RG3 come in late as well?

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Sep 19, 2016 7:11pm

like_that;1811708 wrote:Me too, doesn't mean I can't talk about our future QB.

Oh I'm all about talking about our next QB lol

Never understood why people get weird about talking about future draft picks in the middle of the season. If it's a Tuesday night, why can't we discuss who we want in the draft?

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Sep 19, 2016 7:40pm

SportsAndLady;1811712 wrote:Oh I'm all about talking about our next QB lol

Never understood why people get weird about talking about future draft picks in the middle of the season. If it's a Tuesday night, why can't we discuss who we want in the draft?

Yeah sure, why not. It's just so frustrating becuase history has shown, we'll take Founette at #1 and take a shit QB with the lolgles pick.

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Sep 19, 2016 7:41pm

Commander of Awesome;1811713 wrote:Yeah sure, why not. It's just so frustrating becuase history has shown, we'll take Founette at #1 and take a shit QB with the lolgles pick.

Yep.

I'll lose my shit, we'll again be 4-12, and no future QB.

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Sep 19, 2016 7:54pm

Commander of Awesome;1811713 wrote:Yeah sure, why not. It's just so frustrating becuase history has shown, we'll take Founette at #1 and take a shit QB with the lolgles pick.

I had a dumbass friend who said he is not impressed by Watson and he wouldn't mind Fournette with their first pick smfh.

S

Sonofanump

Sep 19, 2016 8:06pm

like_that;1811715 wrote:I had a dumbass friend who said he is not impressed by Watson and he wouldn't mind Fournette with their first pick smfh.

The only thing I don't like about Watson is his height.

Laley23

Posts: 29,506

Sep 19, 2016 8:45pm

PFF has a feature somewhere that shows how bad Watson is under pressure. No thanks. Didn't really like him as a pro before reading that, definitely don't now.

Crimson streak

Posts: 9,002

Sep 19, 2016 9:01pm

Laley23;1811718 wrote:PFF has a feature somewhere that shows how bad Watson is under pressure. No thanks. Didn't really like him as a pro before reading that, definitely don't know.

That's why I like Kizer a lot more. Pretty good against the blitz and checks in and out of a lot of plays.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ironman92

Posts: 49,363

Sep 19, 2016 9:02pm

Laley23;1811718 wrote:PFF has a feature somewhere that shows how bad Watson is under pressure. No thanks. Didn't really like him as a pro before reading that, definitely don't know.

That might be THE most important thing. It's way up there.

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Sep 19, 2016 9:13pm

Crimson streak;1811720 wrote:That's why I like Kizer a lot more. Pretty good against the blitz and checks in and out of a lot of plays.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You're also very biased Crimson lol

Crimson streak

Posts: 9,002

Sep 19, 2016 9:24pm

SportsAndLady;1811722 wrote:You're also very biased Crimson lol

I usually put my bias aside when it comes to the browns and ND players. Like I knew Brady Quinn and clausen would blow dick in the NFL. Nether had the accuracy or arm strength and were bailed out by great receivers most of the time at ND. Kizer just is that prototypical QB that has all the tools and the smarts to be very good. I could be wrong but I think he would make a very good pro

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

C

Con_Alma

Posts: 12,198

Sep 19, 2016 9:30pm

Browns are signing Charlie Whitehurst.

Crimson streak

Posts: 9,002

Sep 19, 2016 9:38pm

Watching wentz play makes me want to throw up. I know it's still early but he looks legit

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Sep 19, 2016 9:39pm

Crimson streak;1811727 wrote:Watching wentz play makes me want to throw up. I know it's still early but he looks legit

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yep.

Could have just had our franchise QB.

HitsRus

Posts: 9,206

Sep 19, 2016 9:57pm

Browns signing Charlie Whitehurst to back up Kessler.

per NFL.com

iclfan2

Posts: 6,360

Sep 19, 2016 10:13pm

I have no confidence that Wentz would have played this well with the Browns. And hindsight on the trade is always 20/20. Can't wait for philly to not be in prime time so all of the Browns twitter hot takes can stop.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Sep 19, 2016 10:18pm

iclfan2;1809473 wrote:As mentioned in the NFL thread, Eagles starting qb is now Chase Daniels and backup is a rookie. Two top 5/10 picks coming out way

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fuck. You.

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Sep 19, 2016 10:19pm

iclfan2;1811732 wrote:I have no confidence that Wentz would have played this well with the Browns. And hindsight on the trade is always 20/20. Can't wait for philly to not be in prime time so all of the Browns twitter hot takes can stop.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lol. I was waiting for this post.

"He wouldn't be this good on the Browns!"

It's very easy to watch Wentz and tell that he is going to be a very good QB, and we passed on him...despite needing a QB.

iclfan2

Posts: 6,360

Sep 19, 2016 10:20pm

Commander of Awesome;1811733 wrote:Fuck. You.

Lol yea I wasn't gonna mention that

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Sep 19, 2016 10:21pm

SportsAndLady;1811734 wrote:Lol. I was waiting for this post.

"He wouldn't be this good on the Browns!"

It's very easy to watch Wentz and tell that he is going to be a very good QB, and we passed on him...despite needing a QB.

Browns wr > eagles
Browns running game > eagles

" he would suck with Browns though!" Delusional

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Sep 19, 2016 10:22pm

Benny The Jet;1809537 wrote:Eagles saying Wentz to start if healthy. When's the last time a team got #1 & 2 picks on a draft? Answer...2016.

Kindly GFY

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Sep 19, 2016 10:23pm

Commander of Awesome;1811737 wrote:Browns wr > eagles
Browns running game > eagles

" he would suck with Browns though!" Delusional

Eagles line > Browns line though.

iclfan2

Posts: 6,360

Sep 19, 2016 10:26pm

SportsAndLady;1811734 wrote:Lol. I was waiting for this post.

"He wouldn't be this good on the Browns!"

It's very easy to watch Wentz and tell that he is going to be a very good QB, and we passed on him...despite needing a QB.

We need a whole lot of shit, hence the trade for a bunch of picks. My point is the coaching in Philly helps him a lot:

Not saying he wouldn't be good here, but to say he'd be playing the same is a little much. For one he'd probably be injured already.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk