S
Sonofanump
Apr 29, 2016 10:43am
I'll guess Ragland or Jack (had 20 hours to figure out the slide or consider the extent of the recovery/injury).

like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 29, 2016 10:46am
Give me spence with the 32nd pick plz. Also FWIW pro football focus had Coleman as their #1 WR prospect.

like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 29, 2016 10:47am
Also, can we LOL at the idiots less than a year ago who wanted to tank for Cardale Jones?
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
Apr 29, 2016 10:47am
I like the idea of Spence....kid has a chip on his shoulder after what he went through on the collegiate level

Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Apr 29, 2016 10:48am
I wouldn't be surprised if we trade out of the pick.

Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Apr 29, 2016 10:54am
If we trade out better get a 1st next yr
A
Al Bundy
Posts: 4,180
Apr 29, 2016 10:56am
I wouldn't be surprised either. I really hope we don't risk taking Jack because it is too big of a risk for us in our current situation, but it does make sense for more established teams to take a risk.Mulva;1794072 wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if we trade out of the pick.
A
Al Bundy
Posts: 4,180
Apr 29, 2016 10:58am
I'd want either 1 next year or an early 2 this year along with a 2 next year.Commander of Awesome;1794075 wrote:If we trade out better get a 1st next yr

sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Apr 29, 2016 11:01am
It depends on how much we have to drop. If it's into the late 2nd, we better get a 1st next year. If its only a few spots, I'm okay with a 2nd next year.Commander of Awesome;1794075 wrote:If we trade out better get a 1st next yr
You have to remember the pick here is essentially a 1st so we better get good value out of it.

se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Apr 29, 2016 11:09am
I'm just saying a WR with drop issues and sub-standard route running just isn't exciting to me. Obviously, I hope he becomes a HoF'er.SportsAndLady;1794038 wrote:But you weren't screaming from the rooftops to take beckham. Because WR's are crapshoots. No one knows who the good ones and bad ones are going to be.
Browns felt Coleman was the best so they took him. Now we wait and see if he's good.
Criticizing the Browns for this pick is so beyond retarded. Like someone just said, there wasn't a Julio Jones available at 2 that they passed on. They took their choice of top WR.

SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 29, 2016 11:19am
I wouldn't say he has drop issues. He had 10 drops last year. That's less than 1 a game. Is he "sure-handed"? No. Does he have a drop issue? No.se-alum;1794083 wrote:I'm just saying a WR with drop issues and sub-standard route running just isn't exciting to me. Obviously, I hope he becomes a HoF'er.
Again, we'll see what happens. It's impossible to say whether mid to late first round WR's are going to pan out or not.
A
Al Bundy
Posts: 4,180
Apr 29, 2016 11:21am
He'll fit right in.se-alum;1794083 wrote:I'm just saying a WR with drop issues and sub-standard route running just isn't exciting to me. Obviously, I hope he becomes a HoF'er.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Apr 29, 2016 11:29am
SportsAndLady;1794038 wrote:
Criticizing the Browns for this pick is so beyond retarded. Like someone just said, there wasn't a Julio Jones available at 2 that they passed on. They took their choice of top WR.
I agree with this.

iclfan2
Posts: 6,360
Apr 29, 2016 1:17pm
It is looking like there is almost no way they stay at 32. Will be interesting.

SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 29, 2016 1:37pm

like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 29, 2016 1:53pm
Ian Rapoport Verified accounticlfan2;1794123 wrote:It is looking like there is almost no way they stay at 32. Will be interesting.
‏@RapSheet
The #Cowboys are attempting to trade up with the #Browns at No. 32, source said. The likely target is a pass-rusher.
Browns should take it. They only move down 2 spots.

SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 29, 2016 1:56pm
Any interest in Connor cook tonight?

Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Apr 29, 2016 1:57pm
Nope. Not even in the 7th round. He sucks.SportsAndLady;1794130 wrote:Any interest in Connor cook tonight?

iclfan2
Posts: 6,360
Apr 29, 2016 1:58pm
Ha, mainly this. Do not want.Commander of Awesome;1794131 wrote:Nope. Not even in the 7th round. He sucks.

like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 29, 2016 2:01pm
The highest I would go is 3rd pick. I am ok with taking a QB every draft until we figure it out.SportsAndLady;1794130 wrote:Any interest in Connor cook tonight?

Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Apr 29, 2016 2:01pm
My top 3 areSportsAndLady;1794060 wrote:For 32, I'm for any defensive position or O-Line.
Ragland
Spence
Spriggs
Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk

Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Apr 29, 2016 2:03pm
No way they are getting a 1 or even likely any extra 2s... that's not happening. You'd be swapping and MAYBE get a 3rd.sleeper;1794080 wrote:It depends on how much we have to drop. If it's into the late 2nd, we better get a 1st next year. If its only a few spots, I'm okay with a 2nd next year.
You have to remember the pick here is essentially a 1st so we better get good value out of it.
Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk

Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Apr 29, 2016 2:04pm
He could be really good. But he could be terrible and have a whole team that hates him too.SportsAndLady;1794130 wrote:Any interest in Connor cook tonight?
I'll pass
Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk

like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 29, 2016 2:05pm
I would easily take a third or 4th.Midstate01;1794137 wrote:No way they are getting a 1 or even likely any extra 2s... that's not happening. You'd be swapping and MAYBE get a 3rd.
Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk

Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Apr 29, 2016 2:26pm
I think getting a 3 would be awesome. A 4th is probably likely though.like_that;1794140 wrote:I would easily take a third or 4th.
Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk