Iliketurtles
Terry Tate
Mulva
Laley23
SportsAndLady
Goonx19

I have 2 others, no names...but that's 8, so everyone has paid.

Looking forward to Mulva winning 8 weeks and then getting beat by ILT in the first round of the playoffs by 0.10 FPPG.

Terry_Tate;1762924 wrote:Looking forward to Mulva winning 8 weeks and then getting beat by ILT in the first round of the playoffs by 0.10 FPPG.

A tradition unlike any other.

Azubuike24;1762900 wrote:Iliketurtles
Terry Tate
Mulva
Laley23
SportsAndLady
Goonx19

I have 2 others, no names...but that's 8, so everyone has paid.

Lafferty said he sent you money so I'm assuming one of those two are his.

Probably the one who paid with goods and services like $38.24 haha.

Mulva;1758557 wrote:Thank god. Saves me from getting sucked in for the 3rd year in a row.

Laley23;1758558 wrote:LOL. And I think you've complained each time...

Hammons hasn't even played tonight in Purdue's opener. The fuck is wrong with that guy? So much ability.

Terry_Tate;1762924 wrote:Looking forward to Mulva winning 8 weeks and then getting beat by ILT in the first round of the playoffs by 0.10 FPPG.

This will not be one of the weeks. Van Vleet barely plays with a tweaked hammy and gets 1 assist and nothing else.

My teams proved to be mediocre. Lot of guys who didn't get the minutes or touches I expected.

Azubuike24;1761022 wrote:I don't think we should penalize someone for a move pre-draft. After all, it's essentially going back on the draft pick...

Maybe others will object, but I don't see the big deal with it. And it eliminates the guys with no stats.

Laley, on your question, I say we just use discretion. The 5% rule is in place to implement strategy and to eliminate gaining an advantage outside of the draft. If a guy tears an ACL on the 2nd possession of a game and accumulates 0 stats, I don't think it's unfair to give that team a chance to add a comparable player. For the first week, I think we can be liberal with this stuff if there are no objections. After that, the rule applies.

Well, EC Mathews tears his ACL.

I tried to to make a post to take Ryan Anderson or Deyonta Davis before their games but had no service. If you guys don't mind I'll take one of them, but they both had good ones. So I understand if you want me to take someone else.

A nice 60-spot for Kris Dunn in his opener.

Laley23;1763116 wrote:Well, EC Mathews tears his ACL.

I tried to to make a post to take Ryan Anderson or Deyonta Davis before their games but had no service. If you guys don't mind I'll take one of them, but they both had good ones. So I understand if you want me to take someone else.

Go for it, either one.

Azubuike24;1763311 wrote:Go for it, either one.

Just tried to add Anderson. Wouldnt let me because of waivers.

Can you just swap him for EC Mathews?

As for week 1, should I count the ECM game, or the rest of Ryan Andersons games...all of his games? A combo of both players games? lol

Should be fixed.

Lineup changes shouldn't be impacted until next week, right?

Otherwise lets go ahead and let me swap out Van Vleet who also put up 1.5 points due to an injury.

I didn't realize it was torn IN the game. Yes, it should be reflected next week and you take a 0. That's just how it goes. I changed it back. And made the drop effective in week 2.

Azubuike24;1763332 wrote:I didn't realize it was torn IN the game. Yes, it should be reflected next week and you take a 0. That's just how it goes. I changed it back. And made the drop effective in week 2.

Thats what I figured. Wasnt sure based on it being season ending though.

Lafferty wants to know if he can drop Watkins on penn state and add reaves on penn state. I told him no since Watkins hasn't played thus has and reaves has like 15 fantasy points. Is that right?

SportsAndLady;1764168 wrote:Lafferty wants to know if he can drop Watkins on penn state and add reaves on penn state. I told him no since Watkins hasn't played thus has and reaves has like 15 fantasy points. Is that right?

Correct, if it was the other way around, it would be fine.

Unless there is an injury involved??

So he has to pick someone who hasn't scored yet this year? Haha

Laley23;1764221 wrote:Correct, if it was the other way around, it would be fine.

Unless there is an injury involved??

He's waiting for an eligibility answer from the NCAA.

Good news for Goon: Gets a 60ish point effort from Denzel Valentine

Bad news for Goon: Chris Fowler is injured and will be out a few weeks. Injuries suck.

Yeah, I don't know how it works for Fowler because his injury didn't occur in a game but it wasn't announced until it was too late to change my roster.

I also need to make sure it doesn't count Karnowski's Pitt stats as a game played, because right now it says he had 6.25 fantasy points against Pitt but that game will be removed from the books.

The rosters are locked on the first day. However, if the guy doesn't play in a game, we don't count the game. So Fowler will not have his games count. It just sucks when it happens like Matthews and he plays 2 minutes and gets hurt. Technically, he takes a 1 for games played and has to get stuck with whatever he earns.

Remember, total points / games participated in = weekly point total.

If a guy is ineligible or suspended, it really doesn't hurt you, because he's not playing in a game. Personally, I would just wait...or add someone with potential to play later in the year...and bench the guy going forward until you get an answer. There are probably a half a dozen ownable players who haven't played yet that I can figure.

GOONx19;1764239 wrote:Yeah, I don't know how it works for Fowler because his injury didn't occur in a game but it wasn't announced until it was too late to change my roster.

I also need to make sure it doesn't count Karnowski's Pitt stats as a game played, because right now it says he had 6.25 fantasy points against Pitt but that game will be removed from the books.

In the "live scoring" it doesn't have the points but is counting it as a game. I have the same problem with Wiltjer.

We're going to have to do some manual calculations but at least Fantrax gives us the data to easily work with. I will have everyone add their own score and why it should differ from Fantrax.

I'm sure they will remove the Pitt/Gonzaga result...or they should.