The Broncos are a piece of shit.Mulva;1756489 wrote:Broncos D is nasty. Tough to expect a win in this one.
Why do you wonder that? The Browns defense may suck but the Donks offense is pretty anemic. Denver wins with defense these days, not Manning throwing for 400 yards & 5 TD's.Tiernan;1756525 wrote:Wonder what the NFL modern era scoring record is?
Maybe for the standards of their offense, but their defense has been pretty fucking legit.slingshot4ever;1756528 wrote:The Broncos have not looked all that great this year. I look for the Browns to keep it close at home.
Browns O-Line was solid in pass protection yesterday. For throwing it 50+ times, they held up well considering they (Ravens) were bringing a pretty heavy rush. They gave up a few sacks but were solid overall. Now, if they could just run block......Azubuike24;1756559 wrote:Losing DeMarcus Ware is a big loss for them though. Their pass D is good, but it gets helped a lot by their front 7, which wreaks havoc on a weak OL.
JT and Bitonio graded out very well on the run blocking. Just the other half of the line was average.BR1986FB;1756581 wrote:Browns O-Line was solid in pass protection yesterday. For throwing it 50+ times, they held up well considering they (Ravens) were bringing a pretty heavy rush. They gave up a few sacks but were solid overall. Now, if they could just run block......
I was in attendance at one of those "2". Beat Elway at home. Felt good.Ironman92;1756475 wrote:Broncos are 21-2 vs the Browns since 1975
I was in attendance for one of those "21", Randy Gradishar took one to the house.BRF;1756584 wrote:I was in attendance at one of those "2". Beat Elway at home. Felt good.
I was at "the Drive". Dog Pound. Will never forget the silence after the Karlis kick (which was wide left, btw). The only sound was the Bronco team celebrating on the field echoing through the stadium.Sonofanump;1756590 wrote:I was in attendance for one of those "21", Randy Gradishar took one to the house.
The best thing that could happen to this team going forward is for McCown to be side lined this week...and beyond. As well as he has played, the future is with number 2.BR1986FB;1756523 wrote:Starting to get a Kelly Holcomb "vibe" about McCown.
As a side note, I heard McCown dinged up his ankle and may not play against Denver. So, FW and the "nuthuggers" can possibly break out the Vaseline......
If they turn to him later in the season, they will be using their 2016 first rounder on a QB.Footwedge;1756599 wrote: As well as he has played, the future is with number 2.
I remember that pick. Fluke play where it bounced off someone's foot, popped up in the air, and Gradishar took it back almost 100 yards.Sonofanump;1756590 wrote:I was in attendance for one of those "21", Randy Gradishar took one to the house.
I think Tom Jackson?BR1986FB;1756608 wrote:I remember that pick. Fluke play where it bounced off someone's foot, popped up in the air, and Gradishar took it back almost 100 yards.
Pretty sure it was.Sonofanump;1756752 wrote:I think Tom Jackson?
No one wears number 2 more appropriately than that piece of shit.Footwedge;1756599 wrote:The best thing that could happen to this team going forward is for McCown to be side lined this week...and beyond. As well as he has played, the future is with number 2.