another option. i clicked the fucking link. read the fucking words, saw the fucking picture and thought "that looks more like it's reflective, than it does glow in the dark." Coupled with the fact that there had to be some sort of flash on the camera that took the fucking picture i asked the uniforms were really glow in the dark or if they were reflective. i mean look at the helmet. The point i'm trying to make is illustrated below:



Only one of those 2 garments claim to be glow in the dark, the other is reflective. tell me which is which.

The shit we argue about in the offseason. *facepalm*

Automatik;1745547 wrote:The shit we argue about in the offseason. *facepalm*

I know. but i'll be damned if i'll let some mouth breather call me a lazy piece of shit because he can't be bothered to think about the meaning of my question.

Automatik;1745547 wrote:The shit we argue about in the offseason. *facepalm*

Lol, this.

But I am enjoying this though.

j_crazy;1745545 wrote: i asked the uniforms were really glow in the dark or if they were reflective.

And the answer was found in the same picture. "#GlowInTheDark"

So you're basically admitting your inability to comprehend the words underneath the picture, because you had to ask a question whose answer was RIGHT THERE.

Your assertion that I "don't understand your point" is a result of the fact I didn't want to presume you were incapable of comprehending the unambiguous and explicit wording under the picture, so the other explanation was you didn't click the link.

So...thanks for clearing up how dense you are? Who gives a shit what it looks like when the explanation of what it is can be found so easily.

To phrase differently--if you knew it was glow in the dark you would not have asked; instead you would have only commented on how it looks like the reflective material in safety vests.

Sweet essay.

Tell us moar!

Automatik;1745556 wrote:
Tell us moar!

What would you like to read?

Also, had to lol @ mouth-breather

Lhslep derails another thread. How soon will he come on to a thread where two other people are arguing and say "can we get back on track? You guys are arguing over pointless shit"

Who cares? Oregon will never win a championship.

sleeper;1745563 wrote:Who cares? Oregon will never win a championship.

True. But at least we'll be able to see them if the lights go out!

DeyDurkie5;1745562 wrote: How soon will he come on to a thread where two other people are arguing and say "can we get back on track? You guys are arguing over pointless shit"

That's what you do, not me. I don't do that because I'm not a flaming hypocrite like you. You're the one who derails threads but calls me out for doing it. IDGAF when you do it, esp on Browns threads, because that's the nature of the beast on the OC.

You're the one getting butthurt by my thread derailing. Would you like some cheese with that whine, you fucking baby?

lhslep134;1745554 wrote:And the answer was found in the same picture. "#GlowInTheDark"

So you're basically admitting your inability to comprehend the words underneath the picture, because you had to ask a question whose answer was RIGHT THERE.

Your assertion that I "don't understand your point" is a result of the fact I didn't want to presume you were incapable of comprehending the unambiguous and explicit wording under the picture, so the other explanation was you didn't click the link.

So...thanks for clearing up how dense you are? Who gives a shit what it looks like when the explanation of what it is can be found so easily.

To phrase differently--if you knew it was glow in the dark you would not have asked; instead you would have only commented on how it looks like the reflective material in safety vests.

my assertion is someone at nike is selling reflective piping on the shoulders of a uniform as glow in the dark. another possibility, which is far more nefarious, is that the photo on that website is photoshopped. as i'm not a subject matter expert on photoshop, i was unable to reference the pixels and determine the accuracy of that allegation. my point was, i know they're telling me this is glow in the dark, but is it really? because it looks like its reflective fabric moreso than glow in the dark. Fuckwit.

j_crazy;1745578 wrote:my assertion is someone at nike is selling reflective piping on the shoulders of a uniform as glow in the dark.

If you want to know why I had a hard time understanding your point, it's because that assertion is absurd to me. Why would they claim it was glow-in-the-dark if it was merely reflective material?

lhslep134;1745590 wrote:If you want to know why I had a hard time understanding your point, it's because that assertion is absurd to me. Why would they claim it was glow-in-the-dark if it was merely reflective material?

Marketing? They don't know the difference? I don't know why they would, or if they did. just that the picture leads me to believe it happened.

j_crazy;1745596 wrote:Marketing? They don't know the difference? I don't know why they would, or if they did. just that the picture leads me to believe it happened.

While I don't agree at least now I know what you meant, so we can immediately get back to this meaningless topic before Durkie hypocritically cries some more about thread de-railing.

j_crazy;1745578 wrote:my assertion is someone at nike is selling reflective piping on the shoulders of a uniform as glow in the dark. another possibility, which is far more nefarious, is that the photo on that website is photoshopped. as i'm not a subject matter expert on photoshop, i was unable to reference the pixels and determine the accuracy of that allegation. my point was, i know they're telling me this is glow in the dark, but is it really? because it looks like its reflective fabric moreso than glow in the dark. Fuckwit.

Dude it was written on the internet, it has to be true.

lhslep134;1745601 wrote:While I don't agree at least now I know what you meant, so we can immediately get back to this meaningless topic before Durkie hypocritically cries some more about thread de-railing.

Talk about butthurt

DeyDurkie5;1745631 wrote:Talk about butthurt

Au contraire, it's hilarious you whine and cry about me thread derailing yet are a blatant offender yourself, esp with COA. You're such a hypocritical little bitch.

lhslep134;1745640 wrote:Au contraire, it's hilarious you whine and cry about me thread derailing yet are a blatant offender yourself, esp with COA. You're such a hypocritical little bitch.

I didn't whine at all. Simply contributed to the thread derail. So in reality, I'm doing exactly what I usually do. I rest my case.

Also, you mad.

I think they just popped open a glow stick and colored on the uniforms with them.

Like someone else said, this isn't going to matter during a game because the lights will be on. I just thought they looked kind of cool, and Oregon's unis are always a topic for discussion.

#tron

Fuck Phil Knight.

bigkahuna;1745443 wrote:http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/2544693-will-the-oregon-ducks-wear-these-glow-in-the-dark-jerseys-for-the-2015-16-season

Saw it today; looks pretty gay.

FIFY