Oregon Has Glow In the Dark Uniforms?!

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ Oregon Has Glow In the Dark Uniforms?!
S

superman

Senior Member

3,582 posts
Aug 11, 2015 10:58 PM
After watching the National Championship game, Oregon should work more on tackling and less on fashion.
Aug 11, 2015 10:58pm
bases_loaded's avatar

bases_loaded

Senior Member

6,912 posts
Aug 11, 2015 11:00 PM
Because we all know how many times it's dark on the field. All this will do is lead to more drunk pissing tickets for fans in the bushes.
Aug 11, 2015 11:00pm
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
Aug 12, 2015 12:10 AM
They will do some cheap ass turn off the lights as they come out of the tunnel BS and in the end they will still only be best of the PAC 12 which puts you on par with The MAC but you can wear flip flops
Aug 12, 2015 12:10am
j_crazy's avatar

j_crazy

7 gram rocks. how i roll.

8,372 posts
Aug 12, 2015 7:58 AM
is it glow in the dark or reflective? the picture looks reflective, like safety vests that security guards wear. If that's the case, couldn't that pose a bit of an unfair advantage during a game? like wouldn't the flash from the thousands of cameras reflect off that shit and into peoples' eyes?

if it truly is glow in the dark, then my question is:

Aug 12, 2015 7:58am
B

bigkahuna

Senior Member

4,454 posts
Aug 12, 2015 8:08 AM
I thought they kind of looked reflective as well, but they looked glow in the dark because of the dark background.

It'll be cool to see them for about 5 minutes just like every other Oregon uniform.
Aug 12, 2015 8:08am
Spock's avatar

Spock

Senior Member

2,853 posts
Aug 12, 2015 8:12 AM
that looks like the dumbest thing I have ever seen
Aug 12, 2015 8:12am
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Aug 12, 2015 8:57 AM
j_crazy;1745480 wrote:is it glow in the dark or reflective? the picture looks reflective, like safety vests that security guards wear.
You couldn't spend thirty seconds and read the link? It explicitly says "player suited up in a glow-in-the-dark uniform".
Aug 12, 2015 8:57am
j_crazy's avatar

j_crazy

7 gram rocks. how i roll.

8,372 posts
Aug 12, 2015 9:37 AM
lhslep134;1745487 wrote:You couldn't spend thirty seconds and read the link? It explicitly says "player suited up in a glow-in-the-dark uniform".
did you look at the picture? the point of the question was that it doesn't look like it's glow in the dark, it looks reflective. Article be damned, it doesn't look like it's glow in the dark. That's why i asked.
Aug 12, 2015 9:37am
S

superman

Senior Member

3,582 posts
Aug 12, 2015 10:18 AM
j_crazy;1745492 wrote:did you look at the picture? the point of the question was that it doesn't look like it's glow in the dark, it looks reflective. Article be damned, it doesn't look like it's glow in the dark. That's why i asked.
But LHS is a lawyer. He is trained to specifically read words and argue.
Aug 12, 2015 10:18am
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
Aug 12, 2015 10:22 AM
superman;1745498 wrote:But LHS is a lawyer. He is a trained monkey that dances for money like all attorneys.
FIFY
Aug 12, 2015 10:22am
j_crazy's avatar

j_crazy

7 gram rocks. how i roll.

8,372 posts
Aug 12, 2015 10:43 AM
superman;1745498 wrote:But LHS is a lawyer. He is trained to specifically read words and argue.
about right.
Aug 12, 2015 10:43am
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Aug 12, 2015 10:59 AM
j_crazy;1745492 wrote:did you look at the picture? the point of the question was that it doesn't look like it's glow in the dark, it looks reflective. Article be damned, it doesn't look like it's glow in the dark. That's why i asked.
j_crazy;1745480 wrote:is it glow in the dark or reflective?
You asked a question that could have been answered by spending 30 seconds and clicking the link. I can't help you're a lazy piece of shit.
Aug 12, 2015 10:59am
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Aug 12, 2015 11:00 AM
superman;1745498 wrote:But LHS is a lawyer. He is trained to specifically read words and argue.
I'm so hurt. Maybe I'll just quit being a lawyer because some random person is jealous of me and tries to insult me on the interwebz.


Cue the "I'm not jealous" response, when you bring up my occupation unsolicited. Jealously isn't a good look on you superman.
Aug 12, 2015 11:00am
S

superman

Senior Member

3,582 posts
Aug 12, 2015 11:01 AM
lhslep134;1745507 wrote:I'm so hurt. Maybe I'll just quit my job because some random person is jealous of me and tries to insult me on the interwebz.
Jealous? That's funny. I'm just making fun of a dipshit that acts like a dipshit.
Aug 12, 2015 11:01am
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Aug 12, 2015 11:04 AM
superman;1745508 wrote:Jealous? That's funny. I'm just making fun of a dipshit that acts like a dipshit.
Predictable response is predictable. Let the butthurt from me being more successful than you flow through your veins.
Aug 12, 2015 11:04am
S

superman

Senior Member

3,582 posts
Aug 12, 2015 11:05 AM
Hahaha. Okay junior.
Aug 12, 2015 11:05am
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Aug 12, 2015 11:08 AM
superman;1745511 wrote:Hahaha. Okay junior.
Am I supposed to be insulted by you? I feel like you think your words have some sort of impact. I couldn't give less of a fuck what some jealous hick from buttfuck Ohio thinks of lawyers, when it clearly stems from some sort of jealously you feel towards people in my field.
Aug 12, 2015 11:08am
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Aug 12, 2015 11:11 AM
Either that, or you fucked up at a point in your life and some lawyer "screwed you". I find a lot of people's hatred towards lawyers is because at some point they breached a contract or defaulted on something and a lawyer got involved to enforce it.
Aug 12, 2015 11:11am
j_crazy's avatar

j_crazy

7 gram rocks. how i roll.

8,372 posts
Aug 12, 2015 11:56 AM
lhslep134;1745506 wrote:You asked a question that could have been answered by spending 30 seconds and clicking the link. I can't help you're a lazy piece of shit.
care to divulge how you know i didn't click the link? i ask because you have no way of knowing. furthermore, i clearly referenced in my original post that it looked reflective and not glow in the dark. That comment begs the question "how did i know about the picture without clicking the link?" so i'll ask again how you know i didn't click the link.

PS. is calling some one a lazy piece of shit because you're clearly manstrating really that warranted on a fucking message board? act like your past puberty numb nuts.
Aug 12, 2015 11:56am
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Aug 12, 2015 12:15 PM
j_crazy;1745528 wrote:so i'll ask again how you know i didn't click the link.
j_crazy;1745480 wrote:is it glow in the dark or reflective?


That's how. looking at the picture it's obvious.
Aug 12, 2015 12:15pm
j_crazy's avatar

j_crazy

7 gram rocks. how i roll.

8,372 posts
Aug 12, 2015 1:29 PM
where was that? on the page with the picture? that was on the link? that i didn't click? is anyone else following this?
Aug 12, 2015 1:29pm
j_crazy's avatar

j_crazy

7 gram rocks. how i roll.

8,372 posts
Aug 12, 2015 1:34 PM
lhslep134;1745532 wrote:

That's how. looking at the picture it's obvious.
don't freak out here, can't stress that enough. i don't think you understand my point. can we agree that the real debate between us is that you don't understand the point of my post? we've pretty much derailed this thread as it stands now.
Aug 12, 2015 1:34pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Aug 12, 2015 1:36 PM
j_crazy;1745540 wrote:where was that?
In the link. That you didn't click. Because you're lazy.
Aug 12, 2015 1:36pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Aug 12, 2015 1:37 PM
Alternatively, you clicked the link but were too high to comprehend the words and images on the page.

Your call which one you want to go with. Not click the link because you're lazy or clicked the link but couldn't comprehend its content.
Aug 12, 2015 1:37pm