BR1986FB;1778055 wrote:
And Blatt should've had his offer rescinded once Lebron decided he was coming back. He was in way over his head trying to coach a bunch of superstars. Blatt is ideal getting the best out of young/moldable guys. Have no idea whether Lue will be the answer as I think "Lebron's gonna Lebron", i.e. "do what Lebron wants" so I don't know how coachable he is.
BR1986FB;1778089 wrote:Sure was. They were never going to win a ring with him coaching and Griffin knew it. They paid $2 million/yr to an assistant (Lue) as a "fall back" plan. He is a great coach teaching younger guys but not the guy to deal with the hand he was dealt (superstar ego's). You could tell Lebron had absolutely no respect for him. A blind monkey should've been able to coach that roster to the Finals once those trades were made.
BR1986FB;1778177 wrote:Please elaborate?
Everyone knew Blatt was not brought in to coach the team he ended up with. He was brought in to coach KI, Waiters, Wiggins, TT, etc., an area where he had strength coaching/developing. He ended up with a team loaded with superstar ego's who had no respect for his European "resume."
You hear Lue in his post game interview last night talking about how the team gave him the game ball after his first NBA coaching victory and how Lebron gave his post game speech in the locker room. The Cavs tried doing that with Blatt after his first NBA victory and he scoffed at the game ball because he "wasn't a rookie coach and it wasn't his first professional coaching victory."
Regardless of the W/L record, there was a disconnect in that locker room and Griffin recognized it. They weren't winning a ring with Blatt.
Fine, I'll play.
"Blatt should have had his offer rescinded"
Umm why? LBJ had just come from a 4 peat trip to the finals with Eric Spolestra, a rookie head coach who started as a fucking video game with the Heat org. Blatt was coaching National Teams in the olympics, and won a bunch of ships in the Euro leagues. He's coached grown men, from various backgrounds and was known as an innovator. What was not to like about the hire capt hindsight? There isn't a perfect path to NBA Head Coach, and nothing prepares you for it like coaching. Blatt wasn't a bad, or a dumb hire.
You'd rather have Mark Jackson who soon as he left Golden State they turn into quite possibly the best team the NBA has seen since 96 Bulls, and will probably go down as one of the greatest teams of all time? Rather hire Lue, who had ZERO coaching exp? Why ,bc Bitch Boy LBj is now back in Cleveland? Guess you didn't learn shit from the last time he was here. Let me remind you, he was a punk, and Gilbert enabled that. Can't let him run the franchise, and I thought the Cavs learned from that. LOLk BR, keep drinking the hindsight kool-aid.
"They were never going to win a ring with him coaching and Griffin knew it."
SMH, talking in certainties about the uncertain. Let me show you an example of why this is a dumb statement, and someone of you age (IE above the age of someone who reads teen lit) should know better. "The Colts will never win a Superbowl with Andrew Luck as QB and Irsay knows it".
See? Just bc you say it, and maybe believe it doesn't make it true, and sure isn't an argument point in your favor.
"You could tell Lebron had absolutely no respect for him. A blind monkey should've been able to coach that roster to the Finals once those trades were made."
Bc LBJ has a history of respecting coaches, including his HC that led him to 2 championships. /Sarcasm Again, you're reading into BS media drama. Did/does LBJ respect him? Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't really matter. LBJ was a official swallowed whistle away from going up 3-0 on the Warriors in the Finals last season. I can't stress that enough. WE ALMOST WON THE SERIES LAST YR NUMBSKULL.
"
You hear Lue in his post game interview last night talking about how the team gave him the game ball after his first NBA coaching victory and how Lebron gave his post game speech in the locker room. The Cavs tried doing that with Blatt after his first NBA victory and he scoffed at the game ball because he "wasn't a rookie coach and it wasn't his first professional coaching victory."
So we should fire the coach, and Lue is the the one to lead us to the promised land bc one coach took a game ball, and one didn't? Thats some teenage drama loving logic right there.
So, in summary, your argument lacks any basis besides your opinion which is largely an emotional one.