You have a chocolate city with a one party system,and you have 3 black cops involved . How is this thing going to be the white man's fault at the end of the day is what I'm wondering. Much like the New Orleans Katrina police episode. We don't need a nationalized police force like Mr. Al Charlatan wants. He and the far left would like something like that.

Glory Days;1726478 wrote:So the grand jury felt bad for him? After all, it was their decision, not his.

He presents the cases how he sees fit.

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1726481 wrote:He presents the cases how he sees fit.

So he tanked it?

superman;1726492 wrote:So he tanked it?

don't know, I wasn't there... but to say he cant influence with his bias is wrong.

It wouldn't surprise me at all if they all walked out with minimal prison time. Even the guy who was charged with 2nd degree murder, no way they actually get a second degree murder out of him. I would have tried manslaughter for the driver and some of the more minor charges for the other officers, but again the the prosecutor bowed to mob rule and the calls for revenge, not justice.

but to say he cant influence with his bias is wrong.

the prosecutor bowed to mob rule and the calls for revenge, not justice.

It's hard to imagine a prosecutor with any more bias than what we just witnessed in Baltimore.

HitsRus;1726512 wrote:It's hard to imagine a prosecutor with any more bias than what we just witnessed in Baltimore.

I think its just hard to believe she actually reviewed all the evidence the same morning as she received it. She definitely had her mind made up or was only interested in quelling the rioting which is akin to judgement by mob rule.

sleeper;1726513 wrote:I think its just hard to believe she actually reviewed all the evidence the same morning as she received it. She definitely had her mind made up or was only interested in quelling the rioting which is akin to judgement by mob rule.

maybe the evidence was that compelling?

sleeper;1726513 wrote:I think its just hard to believe she actually reviewed all the evidence the same morning as she received it. She definitely had her mind made up or was only interested in quelling the rioting which is akin to judgement by mob rule.

The riots and peaceful protest of the Civil Rights Movement of 60's was against the idea of mob rule, justice and punishment against Blacks. Seem that the ideology of today Black Leadership, Black youth and Blacks within the legal system have forgotten what their grandparents vision was an would like to disregard this early Civil Right Movement Agenda and get back to mob rule, justice and punishment.

Convict, Rule, Judge, Burn before facts, evidence and true be told.... let the mobs dictate the profiteering Legal Lawyers and Politicians before the media for personal gains.

When common sense is replace by incompetence everybody loses.

HitsRus;1726512 wrote:It's hard to imagine a prosecutor with any more bias than what we just witnessed in Baltimore.

Exactly; it was done purely for political reasons and mob control.

When you spend billions and trillions on poverty and crime, you purchase billions and trillions of poverty and crime. When will we wake up?


The city of Baltimore received over $1.8 billion from President Obama's stimulus law, including $467.1 million to invest in education and $26.5 million for crime prevention.
Obama claimed last Tuesday that if the Republican-controlled Congress would implement his policies to make "massive investments in urban communities," they could "make a difference right now" in the city, currently in upheaval following the death of Freddie Gray.
However, a Washington Free Beacon analysis found that the Obama administration and Democratically-controlled Congress did make a "massive" investment into Baltimore, appropriating $1,831,768,487 though the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), commonly known as the stimulus.
According to Recovery.gov, one of Baltimore's central ZIP codes, 21201, received the most stimulus funding in the city, a total of $837,955,866. The amount included funding for 276 awards, and the website reports that the spending had created 290 jobs in the fourth quarter in 2013.
Of this amount, $467.1 million went to education; $206.1 million to the environment; $24 million to "family"; $16.1 million to infrastructure; $15.2 million to transportation; $11.9 million to housing; and $3.1 million to job training.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/05/04/as-obama-seeks-urban-investments-baltimore-got-18b-from-stimulus/?intcmp=latestnews

Krugman would say it wasn't enough money and needed to be at least $5-$6B.

Belly35;1726524 wrote:The riots and peaceful protest of the Civil Rights Movement of 60's was against the idea of mob rule, justice and punishment against Blacks. Seem that the ideology of today Black Leadership, Black youth and Blacks within the legal system have forgotten what their grandparents vision was an would like to disregard this early Civil Right Movement Agenda and get back to mob rule, justice and punishment.

Convict, Rule, Judge, Burn before facts, evidence and true be told.... let the mobs dictate the profiteering Legal Lawyers and Politicians before the media for personal gains.

When common sense is replace by incompetence everybody loses.

[IMG]http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/About/General/2013/5/6/1367846464418/Civil-rights-protestors-a-010.jpg[\IMG]

Those were peaceful times Belly.

Belly35;1726524 wrote:The riots and peaceful protest of the Civil Rights Movement of 60's was against the idea of mob rule, justice and punishment against Blacks. Seem that the ideology of today Black Leadership, Black youth and Blacks within the legal system have forgotten what their grandparents vision was an would like to disregard this early Civil Right Movement Agenda and get back to mob rule, justice and punishment.

Convict, Rule, Judge, Burn before facts, evidence and true be told.... let the mobs dictate the profiteering Legal Lawyers and Politicians before the media for personal gains.

When common sense is replace by incompetence everybody loses.

Those were some peaceful times Belly.

QuakerOats;1726527 wrote:Exactly; it was done purely for political reasons and mob control.

This

ZWICK 4 PREZ;1726481 wrote:He presents the cases how he sees fit.

You are right, his assistants present all the evidence he was given. He didn't let bias get involved.

rmolin73;1726658 wrote:Those were some peaceful times Belly.

Thank you for you're contribution to America southern states of America. ,but at least you have the SEC. and this is why i have to have a carry to conceal when i travel to bad neighborhoods.

Glory Days;1726712 wrote:You are right, his assistants present all the evidence he was given. He didn't let bias get involved.

In typical cases his assistants present cases. Are you sure about high profile cases like this?

CNN Breaking News &#8207;@cnnbrk <small class="time" style="font-size: 13px; color: rgb(136, 153, 166);"> 8m8 minutes ago</small>
Baltimore mayor asks Justice Department to probe police practices, says officers will have body cameras by '16. Live: http://cnn.it/go

How about the mayor do his job and have the city probe their own police practices!

rmolin73;1726658 wrote:Those were some peaceful times Belly.

I am going to assume that you have some knowledge of the Civil Rights Movement, in general many of the marches and protest were peaceful non-violent had a direct reason and a goal for the march, an ideology freedom for all.
Most of the violent was a reaction against the movement by Democrats Political Party and Officials. That you most likely support today. YOU CHUMP.

Two Black Leadership MLK and Malcolm X had the same intention, wants and idea of Equal Rights but with different method to achieve those goals.

MLK was Christian non-violent approach where as Malcolm X a Muslim had a violent take all, violent, separatist mentality. Note: There are aspects of Malcolm X that I really supported and his straight forward understanding of the Democrat political agenda for Blacks was true then and even truer today.. You Chumps

You showed just one picture of violence of the 60s, sorry bro this was a pic from the Little Rock Nine, where the school board supported the supreme court Brown vs Brown but the Southern Democrat State Party headed by Democrat Harry Byrd refused comply with the ruling.

Should we post today recorded youtube videos, police and media reports of Black hater beating Whites. Will that simulate more hate? What good does that provide?

Todays Black and White racial separation is wider that ever, race relationship is stressed more now that the 60s &#8230;. Ask yourself why?

Between the violent Muslin Leadership Malcolm X and Southern Democrats aggressive objection to the movement only violence was the answer in their mentality back in the 60's.

Today riots are violence for profit, stealing looting by criminal thugs doing what they believe is their learned entitlement rights, taking from others&#8230;
If this is what today Black Leaders think is proper and justified then they are no better than the racist southern democrat of the 60 and the terrorist Muslim leadership of today.

Belly35;1726898 wrote:(incoherent political rambling)

Yeah man. You get 'em.

Actually it was spot on.

QuakerOats;1726924 wrote:(idiot poster backing up fellow idiot poster)

Yeah man. You get 'em.

When you got nothing to add as value to the topic ..... Stfu mofo...

Belly35;1727055 wrote:When you got nothing to add as value to the topic ..... Stfu mofo...

His humor added a lot more value than your incoherent rambling you worthless old fart.