Because MLB lets pitchers throw at betters heads. Should be automatic ejection. Pitchers who throw at batters are weak.Ironman92;1743881 wrote:Two good bench clearings so far today
Can't disagree more. 1) you have to establish the inside of the plate 2) you sometimes are protecting your own teammate.Sonofanump;1743892 wrote:Because MLB lets pitchers throw at betters heads. Should be automatic ejection. Pitchers who throw at batters are weak.
So throwing 90-95 at someones temple is ok for you?Midstate01;1743903 wrote:Can't disagree more. 1) you have to establish the inside of the plate 2) you sometimes are protecting your own teammate.
I don't like throwing up at the head. But imo anywhere else is fair game. Baseball polices itself for the most part. The players almost always take care of things.
Did you even read his post?Sonofanump;1743916 wrote:So throwing 90-95 at someones temple is ok for you?
Maybe you should re-read my post... the first sentence on the 2nd paragraph.Sonofanump;1743916 wrote:So throwing 90-95 at someones temple is ok for you?
He said "I don't support throwing at people's heads" and you then asked him if he is supportive of throwing at someone's head.Sonofanump;1743919 wrote:1) I state that I don't agree with throwing at batters heads.
2) You state that you can't disagree more because they need to protect the plate.
3) I question throwing at someones temple
Not sure where this is going, I must be confused, you disagree that I don't think that throwing at a batters head is ok but state later that you also don't like throwing at the head.
His "can't disagree more" was in response to you saying that pitchers throwing at batters are weak. You left that part out of #1 in the above post. This is pretty simple, neither of you (or pretty much anyone with a brain) are ok with pitchers throwing at a batters head, lol.Sonofanump;1743919 wrote:1) I state that I don't agree with throwing at batters heads.
2) You state that you can't disagree more because they need to protect the plate.
3) I question throwing at someones temple
Not sure where this is going, I must be confused, you disagree that I don't think that throwing at a batters head is ok but state later that you also don't like throwing at the head.
Gotcha. So not could not disagree more, but rather disagree with this portion of my statement, not my statement as a whole. Thanks.Terry_Tate;1743938 wrote:His "can't disagree more" was in response to you saying that pitchers throwing at batters are weak. You left that part out of #1 in the above post.
Youre the only one who couldn't figure it out lol.Sonofanump;1743967 wrote:Gotcha. So not could not disagree more, but rather disagree with this portion of my statement, not my statement as a whole. Thanks.
Apparently, my mistake in comprehension.Laley23;1744010 wrote:Youre the only one who couldn't figure it out lol.
MLB Network shows everyoneHeretic;1744107 wrote:Pirates were on national TV. I was happy. There was a two-hour rain delay in the bottom of the second. I was annoyed. The game came back. I was happy. Rain came again in the fifth and after another delay, it was postponed.
FFFFFFFUUUUUUUUU....regardless of how good a team is, ESPN refuses to put them on air unless they're playing one of their prized baseball marketplaces, so can't be letting weather squander that opportunity.
Did Elvis touch him on top of the head?Ironman92;1744075 wrote:Through 5 innings and Adrian Beltre already has hit for the cycle...his 3rd career
http://deadspin.com/adrian-beltre-hits-for-the-cycle-in-five-innings-1721958960Sonofanump;1744215 wrote:Did Elvis touch him on top of the head?
I saw where he joined 3 other people but didn't know they were all before 1940. This is even more impressive to me. That comment about the triples is a good one but not a good as one of the guys he tied whose name is Long John Reilly.Ironman92;1744227 wrote:Beltre tied MLB record joking 3 other guys to have hit for 3 cycles in their career......but 1 was in the 1880's, one in the 1920's and the other in the 1930's.
I find this randomly impressive.
When they interviewed him he said it's easy to get triples when you are fast like me lol
He pretty much carried Indiana Baseball to Omaha.Mulva;1744766 wrote:Kyle Schwarber is a beast. The Cubs are loaded for the future.