Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Jan 21, 2016 1:45pm
She didn't protect American lives in Benghazi.
She didn't protect American top-secret intelligence.
She lied about both.
She should be jailed.
Some of Hillary Clinton’s emails on her private server containedinformation so secret that senior lawmakers who oversee the State Departmentcannot read them without fulfilling additional security requirements, Fox Newshas learned.
The emails in question, as Fox News first reported earlier this week, containedintelligence classified at a level beyond “top secret.” Because of thisdesignation, not all the lawmakers on key committees reviewing the case havehigh enough clearances.
A source with knowledge of the intelligence review told Fox News that senior members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, despite having high-level clearances, are among those not authorized to read the intelligence from so-called “special access programs” without taking additional security steps -- like signing new non-disclosure agreements.
These programs are highly restricted to protect intelligencecommunity sources and methods.
As Fox News previously reported, a Jan. 14 letter fromIntelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III to seniorlawmakers said an intelligence review identified "several dozen"additional classified emails -- including specific intelligence from"special access programs" (SAP).
That indicates a level of classification beyond even “top secret,”the label previously given to two emails found on her server, and brings evenmore scrutiny to the Democratic presidential candidate’s handling of thegovernment’s closely held secrets.
Fox News is told that the reviewers who handled the SAP intelligenceidentified in Clinton’s emails had to sign additional non-disclosure agreementseven though they already have the highest level of clearance -- known as TS/SCI or TopSecret/Sensitive Compartmented information. This detail was first reported byNBC News.
This alone seems to undercut the former secretary of state’s andother officials’ claims that the material is "innocuous."
In an interview with NPR, Clinton claimed thelatest IG finding doesn’t change anything and suggested it was politically motivated. “This seems to me to be, you know, another effort to inject thisinto the campaign, it's another leak,” she said. “I'm just going to leave it upto the professionals at the Justice Department because nothing that this says changes the fact that I never sent or received material marked classified.”
Despite Clinton's claims, it is the content that is classified; the markings on the documents do not affect that.
A former Justice Department official said there is another problem -- warnings from State Department IT employees and others that she should be using a government account.
“If you have a situation where someone was knowingly violating the law and that they knew that what they were doing was prohibited by federal law because other people were saying, you're violating the law, knock it off,and they disregarded that advice and they went ahead, that's a very difficult case to defend,” Thomas Dupree said.
Catherine Herridge is an award-winning Chief Intelligence correspondentfor FOX News Channel (FNC) based in Washington, D.C. She covers intelligence, the Justice Departmentand the Department of Homeland Security. Herridge joined FNC in 1996 as a London-based correspondent
She didn't protect American top-secret intelligence.
She lied about both.
She should be jailed.
Some of Hillary Clinton’s emails on her private server containedinformation so secret that senior lawmakers who oversee the State Departmentcannot read them without fulfilling additional security requirements, Fox Newshas learned.
The emails in question, as Fox News first reported earlier this week, containedintelligence classified at a level beyond “top secret.” Because of thisdesignation, not all the lawmakers on key committees reviewing the case havehigh enough clearances.
A source with knowledge of the intelligence review told Fox News that senior members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, despite having high-level clearances, are among those not authorized to read the intelligence from so-called “special access programs” without taking additional security steps -- like signing new non-disclosure agreements.
These programs are highly restricted to protect intelligencecommunity sources and methods.
As Fox News previously reported, a Jan. 14 letter fromIntelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III to seniorlawmakers said an intelligence review identified "several dozen"additional classified emails -- including specific intelligence from"special access programs" (SAP).
That indicates a level of classification beyond even “top secret,”the label previously given to two emails found on her server, and brings evenmore scrutiny to the Democratic presidential candidate’s handling of thegovernment’s closely held secrets.
Fox News is told that the reviewers who handled the SAP intelligenceidentified in Clinton’s emails had to sign additional non-disclosure agreementseven though they already have the highest level of clearance -- known as TS/SCI or TopSecret/Sensitive Compartmented information. This detail was first reported byNBC News.
This alone seems to undercut the former secretary of state’s andother officials’ claims that the material is "innocuous."
In an interview with NPR, Clinton claimed thelatest IG finding doesn’t change anything and suggested it was politically motivated. “This seems to me to be, you know, another effort to inject thisinto the campaign, it's another leak,” she said. “I'm just going to leave it upto the professionals at the Justice Department because nothing that this says changes the fact that I never sent or received material marked classified.”
Despite Clinton's claims, it is the content that is classified; the markings on the documents do not affect that.
A former Justice Department official said there is another problem -- warnings from State Department IT employees and others that she should be using a government account.
“If you have a situation where someone was knowingly violating the law and that they knew that what they were doing was prohibited by federal law because other people were saying, you're violating the law, knock it off,and they disregarded that advice and they went ahead, that's a very difficult case to defend,” Thomas Dupree said.
Catherine Herridge is an award-winning Chief Intelligence correspondentfor FOX News Channel (FNC) based in Washington, D.C. She covers intelligence, the Justice Departmentand the Department of Homeland Security. Herridge joined FNC in 1996 as a London-based correspondent
Apple
Posts: 2,620
Jan 21, 2016 8:54pm
Race is tightening up with a recent big surge from the Bern. Even the ultra-right wing (uber sarcasm) Time Magazine is printing articles how women are beginning to fall out of the Clinton camp...
"Why This Democrat Won't Vote for Hillary Clinton" : http://time.com/4177436/hillary-clinton-juanita-broaddrick/
"Why This Democrat Won't Vote for Hillary Clinton" : http://time.com/4177436/hillary-clinton-juanita-broaddrick/
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Jan 21, 2016 9:04pm
I wouldn't let Bernie Sanders watch my dog and i am going to vote for him in the primary.
Apple
Posts: 2,620
Jan 21, 2016 9:17pm
What type of alternate universe are we living in when the person being investigated says that there is no classified information in her emails, yet before investigators can even look at some of the emails, they must get top secret security clearance to read classified information before being permitted to read the emails.QuakerOats;1777312 wrote:She didn't protect American lives in Benghazi.
She didn't protect American top-secret intelligence.
She lied about both.
She should be jailed.
Some of Hillary Clinton’s emails on her private server containedinformation so secret that senior lawmakers who oversee the State Departmentcannot read them without fulfilling additional security requirements, Fox Newshas learned.
The emails in question, as Fox News first reported earlier this week, containedintelligence classified at a level beyond “top secret.” Because of thisdesignation, not all the lawmakers on key committees reviewing the case havehigh enough clearances.
A source with knowledge of the intelligence review told Fox News that senior members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, despite having high-level clearances, are among those not authorized to read the intelligence from so-called “special access programs” without taking additional security steps -- like signing new non-disclosure agreements.
These programs are highly restricted to protect intelligencecommunity sources and methods.
As Fox News previously reported, a Jan. 14 letter fromIntelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III to seniorlawmakers said an intelligence review identified "several dozen"additional classified emails -- including specific intelligence from"special access programs" (SAP).
That indicates a level of classification beyond even “top secret,”the label previously given to two emails found on her server, and brings evenmore scrutiny to the Democratic presidential candidate’s handling of thegovernment’s closely held secrets.
Fox News is told that the reviewers who handled the SAP intelligenceidentified in Clinton’s emails had to sign additional non-disclosure agreementseven though they already have the highest level of clearance -- known as TS/SCI or TopSecret/Sensitive Compartmented information. This detail was first reported byNBC News.
This alone seems to undercut the former secretary of state’s andother officials’ claims that the material is "innocuous."
In an interview with NPR, Clinton claimed thelatest IG finding doesn’t change anything and suggested it was politically motivated. “This seems to me to be, you know, another effort to inject thisinto the campaign, it's another leak,” she said. “I'm just going to leave it upto the professionals at the Justice Department because nothing that this says changes the fact that I never sent or received material marked classified.”
Despite Clinton's claims, it is the content that is classified; the markings on the documents do not affect that.
A former Justice Department official said there is another problem -- warnings from State Department IT employees and others that she should be using a government account.
“If you have a situation where someone was knowingly violating the law and that they knew that what they were doing was prohibited by federal law because other people were saying, you're violating the law, knock it off,and they disregarded that advice and they went ahead, that's a very difficult case to defend,” Thomas Dupree said.
Catherine Herridge is an award-winning Chief Intelligence correspondentfor FOX News Channel (FNC) based in Washington, D.C. She covers intelligence, the Justice Departmentand the Department of Homeland Security. Herridge joined FNC in 1996 as a London-based correspondent
If HRC is not in trouble I do not know what it means to be in trouble. Then again, I don't know what it is like to have a bank vault behind me like what HRC has with the Clinton Foundation coffers.
W
wkfan
Posts: 1,641
Jan 22, 2016 8:28am
The Clintons have always been made of teflon.....Apple;1777409 wrote:What type of alternate universe are we living in when the person being investigated says that there is no classified information in her emails, yet before investigators can even look at some of the emails, they must get top secret security clearance to read classified information before being permitted to read the emails.
If HRC is not in trouble I do not know what it means to be in trouble. Then again, I don't know what it is like to have a bank vault behind me like what HRC has with the Clinton Foundation coffers.
Q
QuakerOats
Posts: 8,740
Jan 22, 2016 10:34am
She makes Richard Nixon look like a saint.
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Posts: 1,799
Jan 22, 2016 10:50am
It's very ironic that she was involved with the Watergate hearings. The tables have completely turned.QuakerOats;1777492 wrote:She makes Richard Nixon look like a saint.
Apple
Posts: 2,620
Jan 22, 2016 12:03pm
She got kicked off the Nixon prosecution team for being dishonest!Dr Winston O'Boogie;1777503 wrote:It's very ironic that she was involved with the Watergate hearings. The tables have completely turned.
Dr Winston O'Boogie
Posts: 1,799
Jan 22, 2016 12:10pm
I think that is an urban legend. However the iron still stands.Apple;1777521 wrote:She got kicked off the Nixon prosecution team for being dishonest!
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Jan 22, 2016 12:21pm
She wasn't fired or kicked off the investigation. She is rumored to have committed done ethical misdeeds. As with everything else Clinton related, noting seems to have stuck.Dr Winston O'Boogie;1777523 wrote:I think that is an urban legend. However the iron still stands.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Jan 22, 2016 12:25pm
True. As opposed to the mature and reserved reactions OC Conservatives have when people bring up links from the HuffPo or other left-leaning sites. Oh, wait, when that happens, "disparage the messenger" is the order of the day.QuakerOats;1777311 wrote:You don't like the news so disparage the messenger. Typical Clinton tactic.
Lulz for the comedy.
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Jan 22, 2016 2:35pm
There is a huge difference between America's most trusted news source and an Internet blog site dedicated to the liberal cause.Heretic;1777527 wrote:True. As opposed to the mature and reserved reactions OC Conservatives have when people bring up links from the HuffPo or other left-leaning sites. Oh, wait, when that happens, "disparage the messenger" is the order of the day.
Lulz for the comedy.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Jan 22, 2016 2:49pm
Apple;1777521 wrote:She got kicked off the Nixon prosecution team for being dishonest!
Dr Winston O'Boogie;1777523 wrote:I think that is an urban legend. However the iron still stands.
This provides some insight. http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/zeifman.aspsuperman;1777525 wrote:She wasn't fired or kicked off the investigation. She is rumored to have committed done ethical misdeeds. As with everything else Clinton related, noting seems to have stuck.
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Jan 25, 2016 5:41pm
Bloomberg smells blood in the water.
Spock
Posts: 2,853
Jan 25, 2016 10:20pm
lets look at this from another angle.......Bloomberg is basically going to hand the POTUS to Trump.majorspark;1778126 wrote:Bloomberg smells blood in the water.
I think that he might be in bed with Trump and is sabotaging the Dems in some shady backdoor deal with Trump.
FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Jan 25, 2016 10:24pm
I feel like trump is in bed with Clinton and sabotaging the RepublicansSpock;1778150 wrote:lets look at this from another angle.......Bloomberg is basically going to hand the POTUS to Trump.
I think that he might be in bed with Trump and is sabotaging the Dems in some shady backdoor deal with Trump.
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Jan 25, 2016 10:44pm
ThisFatHobbit;1778152 wrote:I feel like trump is in bed with Clinton and sabotaging the Republicans
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Jan 25, 2016 11:04pm
You guys sound like Bernie Sanders. Billionaires and millionaires colluding to manipulate the political process.
FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Jan 25, 2016 11:15pm
FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Jan 25, 2016 11:18pm
Lol I don't think Bloomberg is colluding, but Trump is such an abrasive douche I can't believe he is seriousmajorspark;1778161 wrote:You guys sound like Bernie Sanders. Billionaires and millionaires colluding to manipulate the political process.
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
Jan 26, 2016 1:09am
But you state Trump is.FatHobbit;1778163 wrote:Lol I don't think Bloomberg is colluding, but Trump is such an abrasive douche I can't believe he is serious
That is the definition of collusion.FatHobbit;1778152 wrote:I feel like trump is in bed with Clinton and sabotaging the Republicans
Again insinuating collusion to manipulate the political process. I stand by my post.Spock;1778150 wrote:lets look at this from another angle.......Bloomberg is basically going to hand the POTUS to Trump.
I think that he might be in bed with Trump and is sabotaging the Dems in some shady backdoor deal with Trump.
I will not vote for Trump in the primary. When I have my choices in the general I will make one.
As for Hillary another coughing spell and some may wonder if she is choking on something other than her own lies. By her own admission when fatigued she is prone to "misspeak". That is political speak for lie. A presidential campaign as well as holding the office of the POTUS will many times leave one sleep deprived. Someone needs to ask her if she has overcome this weakness.
FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Jan 26, 2016 1:48am
I didn't mean that Trump IS really doing it, only that he is such an a hole it feels like he is trying to give Hillary the election.majorspark;1778167 wrote:But you state Trump is.
That is the definition of collusion.
Again insinuating collusion to manipulate the political process. I stand by my post.
I will not vote for Trump in the primary. When I have my choices in the general I will make one.
As for Hillary another coughing spell and some may wonder if she is choking on something other than her own lies. By her own admission when fatigued she is prone to "misspeak". That is political speak for lie. A presidential campaign as well as holding the office of the POTUS will many times leave one sleep deprived. Someone needs to ask her if she has overcome this weakness.
CenterBHSFan
Posts: 6,115
Jan 26, 2016 5:05am
There's got to be a Rothschild in that mix, somewhere!majorspark;1778161 wrote:You guys sound like Bernie Sanders. Billionaires and millionaires colluding to manipulate the political process.
Belly35
Posts: 9,716
Jan 26, 2016 7:06am
Belly as of now will support Trump. Hope this helps
"There are no perfect men in the world; only perfect intentions."
"There are no perfect men in the world; only perfect intentions."
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Jan 26, 2016 5:28pm
[video=youtube;xXiRfNB5TzM][/video]