pkebker wrote:

Al Capone wrote:

HighRoller74 wrote: Why do you listen to Cleveland radio?

You'd think you'd be listening to Pittsburgh radio.



And watch how this works.


I was watching Pittsburgh TV and some Squeeler fan was calling for sweeping change among the entire front office and coaching staff HA HA HA luv it LOL!!!!!!1111One!!!!111

Sorry. Any Pittsburgher knows that's a lie. Go kiss Tressel for me.

Not a lie. I live just outside of Pitt, and many Steeler fans want the coaching staff fired. This coaching staff has been changing all of the Steeler philosophies, like switching from a runningg offense into a passing offense. And manywant Big Ben gone too...

buckeyes_woowee wrote: I'm starting to warm up to the idea of the Browns making a move to get Bradford. His shoulder worries me but if healthy I think he has a chance to be a top 5 QB in the NFL in a few years

BR1986FB wrote: NORMAN, Okla. — Sam Bradford’s workout Monday in front of representatives for all 32 NFL teams at Oklahoma’s pro day almost left me speechless. And that’s saying something.

Bradford threw more than 100 passes during the workout and, in my estimation, didn’t have one that was uncatchable. He moved around well, including throwing on the run out of the pocket, and went through the entire route tree.

It really was a treat to watch, and I think everyone here was in awe of Bradford’s performance. In fact, he put on the best quarterback workout by a draft prospect that I’ve seen since I watched a private workout Troy Aikman put on for us with the Cowboys in California.

If Bradford is feeling the effects of his shoulder injury or is experiencing any weakness, there were no indications of that. He threw with velocity during the entire workout.

Terry Shea, a former college and NFL coach who’s working with Bradford as a quarterback consultant, told me they’ve been together for nine weeks. The first five weeks of workouts, Bradford didn’t even throw. They only worked on footwork because Bradford hadn’t been cleared by doctors yet.

I would imagine that two weeks from now, Bradford’s arm will be even stronger than what we saw. And it was very strong Monday.

– Gil Brandt

buckeyes_woowee wrote: I'm starting to warm up to the idea of the Browns making a move to get Bradford. His shoulder worries me but if healthy I think he has a chance to be a top 5 QB in the NFL in a few years

Writerbuckeye wrote:

buckeyes_woowee wrote: I'm starting to warm up to the idea of the Browns making a move to get Bradford. His shoulder worries me but if healthy I think he has a chance to be a top 5 QB in the NFL in a few years

No thanks. The price will be WAY too high.

Fix as much as you can with the picks you've got (in a deep draft) and pick a QB in the second round or later who can be a project.

BR1986FB wrote:

pkebker wrote:

Al Capone wrote:

HighRoller74 wrote: Why do you listen to Cleveland radio?

You'd think you'd be listening to Pittsburgh radio.



And watch how this works.


I was watching Pittsburgh TV and some Squeeler fan was calling for sweeping change among the entire front office and coaching staff HA HA HA luv it LOL!!!!!!1111One!!!!111

Sorry. Any Pittsburgher knows that's a lie. Go kiss Tressel for me.

Not a lie. I live just outside of Pitt, and many Steeler fans want the coaching staff fired. This coaching staff has been changing all of the Steeler philosophies, like switching from a runningg offense into a passing offense. And manywant Big Ben gone too...

Yep. Have heard that from quite a few Pittsburgh fans. Not happy about getting away from "Steeler football" (i.e. poor rushing attack/pass happy offense).

And if there are any Browns' fans looking to throw Holmgren under the bus it's because their "lady" Brady got sent packing, they are pissed, and they won't have anyones nuts to ride anymore.

Writerbuckeye wrote: No thanks. The price will be WAY too high.

Fix as much as you can with the picks you've got (in a deep draft) and pick a QB in the second round or later who can be a project.

sleeper wrote: Bradford? Look, you could throw freaking Peyton Manning on the Browns right now and they'd still suck. The defense is junk, the skill players are junk(except Cribbs, but he's a ST), and we have 1 good prospect on the OL.

sleeper wrote: Bradford? Look, you could throw freaking Peyton Manning on the Browns right now and they'd still suck.

SportsAndLady wrote: Get Bradford.

End of story.

buckeyes_woowee wrote:

sleeper wrote: Bradford? Look, you could throw freaking Peyton Manning on the Browns right now and they'd still suck. The defense is junk, the skill players are junk(except Cribbs, but he's a ST), and we have 1 good prospect on the OL.

Bradford wouldn't start for 2 or 3 years. plenty of time to fix some pieces.

Bullshit! I love when people give the old "you could put Peyton Manning on the Browns and they'd suck" line. Austin Collie & Pierre Garcon are FAR from elite receivers yet Manning MAKES them play at a higher level. The elite QB's will get the most out of their weapons by pushing them to a higher level to get better or tell them to GTFO. Peyton Manning on last years Browns equals 8-8/9-7.

BR1986FB wrote: I think that Bradford is head & shoulders above every QB in this draft and COULD be the next Peyton Manning. The issue is that we'd have to give up a "Ditka-like" deal to get him. Especially since the Rams and the rest of the league have a major hard on for him after today. Not willing to part with, likely, two 1sts, two 2nd's and more for him.

sleeper wrote:

buckeyes_woowee wrote:

sleeper wrote: Bradford? Look, you could throw freaking Peyton Manning on the Browns right now and they'd still suck. The defense is junk, the skill players are junk(except Cribbs, but he's a ST), and we have 1 good prospect on the OL.

Bradford wouldn't start for 2 or 3 years. plenty of time to fix some pieces.

I think I've heard this before, how did Brady Quinn work out?

Bullshit! I love when people give the old "you could put Peyton Manning on the Browns and they'd suck" line. Austin Collie & Pierre Garcon are FAR from elite receivers yet Manning MAKES them play at a higher level. The elite QB's will get the most out of their weapons by pushing them to a higher level to get better or tell them to GTFO. Peyton Manning on last years Browns equals 8-8/9-7.

Who's going to block for him? Joe Thomas and ...? Is he going to play defense too?

And seriously 8-8, 9-7? LOL

Footwedge wrote:

BR1986FB wrote: I think that Bradford is head & shoulders above every QB in this draft and COULD be the next Peyton Manning. The issue is that we'd have to give up a "Ditka-like" deal to get him. Especially since the Rams and the rest of the league have a major hard on for him after today. Not willing to part with, likely, two 1sts, two 2nd's and more for him.

I would be willing to swap our 7th overall pick in the draft and our #2's...both of them.

But no more. One can't say he'll be the next Peyton. I think these 3 draft choices might be enough.

Footwedge wrote:

sleeper wrote:

buckeyes_woowee wrote:

sleeper wrote: Bradford? Look, you could throw freaking Peyton Manning on the Browns right now and they'd still suck. The defense is junk, the skill players are junk(except Cribbs, but he's a ST), and we have 1 good prospect on the OL.

Bradford wouldn't start for 2 or 3 years. plenty of time to fix some pieces.

I think I've heard this before, how did Brady Quinn work out?

Bullshit! I love when people give the old "you could put Peyton Manning on the Browns and they'd suck" line. Austin Collie & Pierre Garcon are FAR from elite receivers yet Manning MAKES them play at a higher level. The elite QB's will get the most out of their weapons by pushing them to a higher level to get better or tell them to GTFO. Peyton Manning on last years Browns equals 8-8/9-7.

Who's going to block for him? Joe Thomas and ...? Is he going to play defense too?

And seriously 8-8, 9-7? LOL

Browns o-line was actually really good the last 4 weeks of the season. I think they ended up as the 8th best rushing team in the league.

They still need improvements from their wideouts.

Footwedge wrote:

sleeper wrote:

buckeyes_woowee wrote:

sleeper wrote: Bradford? Look, you could throw freaking Peyton Manning on the Browns right now and they'd still suck. The defense is junk, the skill players are junk(except Cribbs, but he's a ST), and we have 1 good prospect on the OL.

Bradford wouldn't start for 2 or 3 years. plenty of time to fix some pieces.

I think I've heard this before, how did Brady Quinn work out?

Bullshit! I love when people give the old "you could put Peyton Manning on the Browns and they'd suck" line. Austin Collie & Pierre Garcon are FAR from elite receivers yet Manning MAKES them play at a higher level. The elite QB's will get the most out of their weapons by pushing them to a higher level to get better or tell them to GTFO. Peyton Manning on last years Browns equals 8-8/9-7.

Who's going to block for him? Joe Thomas and ...? Is he going to play defense too?

And seriously 8-8, 9-7? LOL

Browns o-line was actually really good the last 4 weeks of the season. I think they ended up as the 8th best rushing team in the league.

They still need improvements from their wideouts.