insuranceguy wrote:

devil1197 wrote: So McNabb is going to go for a 3rd and 5th? I would assume the Eagles would at least try to get a 2nd from Cleveland which I would have trouble with.

A 3rd and 5th, I'd take him but nothing higher than that.

So the Browns second round picks have done so well that you dont give up a 2nd round draft pick for the best Qb this town has seen since Kosar. Thanks goodness you are not the Browns GM.

BR1986FB wrote: There will be NO quarterback competition in Cleveland this year. Holmgren has already stated that.

I firmly believe that if they can get McNabb, a RG/RT, #1 WR and perhaps another RB, they can be a .500 team THIS year. Assuming they use multiple picks on the defense. Hell, they should have won 7 games (blew Detroit & Cincy games) this past year with that group of shitbags.

devil1197 wrote:

BR1986FB wrote: There will be NO quarterback competition in Cleveland this year. Holmgren has already stated that.

I firmly believe that if they can get McNabb, a RG/RT, #1 WR and perhaps another RB, they can be a .500 team THIS year. Assuming they use multiple picks on the defense. Hell, they should have won 7 games (blew Detroit & Cincy games) this past year with that group of shitbags.

That is a lot of ifs in just one off season.

Where do you see the #1 WR coming from?

devil1197 wrote: That is a ton of IF's lol.

Also, I want no part in Best. He is a walking concussion just waiting to happen now imo. I'd rather take Mathews if available.

buckeyes_woowee wrote: I hope they dont lose Vickers. IMO he is top 5 in the NFL

devil1197 wrote: Yes, its a lot of IF's.

First off, its an IF to draft some of the players we are mentioning. Heckert and Holmgren could go a totally different route than what he are hoping for. Secondly, its a huge IF to see if those guys actually pan out. Our luck hasn't been that great.

Then its an IF to trade for McNabb and a starting OL player.

Right now its a bunch of IF's and possibilities, I'll start to get excited when I see some movement.

royal_k wrote: Have trust and patience Devil....that's all we can do.

wes_mantooth wrote:

devil1197 wrote: Yes, its a lot of IF's.

First off, its an IF to draft some of the players we are mentioning. Heckert and Holmgren could go a totally different route than what he are hoping for. Secondly, its a huge IF to see if those guys actually pan out. Our luck hasn't been that great.

Then its an IF to trade for McNabb and a starting OL player.

Right now its a bunch of IF's and possibilities, I'll start to get excited when I see some movement.

Damn Pessimist....SMH

ytownfootball wrote: Anything in return worthy of note for Hadnot?

BR1986FB wrote:

ytownfootball wrote: Anything in return worthy of note for Hadnot?

He's unrestricted so we'll get nothing.

My earlier comment about the Browns reaching out to a "prominent" free agent and speculating that it was Thomas Jones was a blunder. I now found out that it's NOT a UFA that they reached out to but a RESTRICTED free agent of prominence. Hopefully this gets good.

buckeyes_woowee wrote: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/06/report-browns-want-david-carr/

I know it was mentioned before about Carr but seems like things might be heating up.

buckeyes_woowee wrote:

BR1986FB wrote:

ytownfootball wrote: Anything in return worthy of note for Hadnot?

He's unrestricted so we'll get nothing.

My earlier comment about the Browns reaching out to a "prominent" free agent and speculating that it was Thomas Jones was a blunder. I now found out that it's NOT a UFA that they reached out to but a RESTRICTED free agent of prominence. Hopefully this gets good.

Oh man! I wonder who it would be! Any way its Marshall?