lhslep134;1709789 wrote:You can think whatever you want but I disagree.
PFF gave the Bills a C and the Eagles an A but that was only based on fit with the new teams and no other factors.
lhslep134;1709790 wrote:If you think the Eagles' success was because of McCoy and not the offensive line, how can you account for LeSean's 'meh' season this year when the offensive line wasn't healthy but Sproles still did well?
The Eagles' offensive spacing and offensive line is way more valuable than any running back, even McCoy. Factor in the salary, and it makes total sense for the Eagles.
1,300+ yards isn't a "meh" season. I get a lot of eagles games in my area. The last two seasons, that offense is its best when Mccoy gets it going. There were some games that their special teams single handedly won them the game and Mccoy didn't even have to be a factor. Sproles has always been a good change of pace back for high flying offenses, but he is not even close to being a game breaking RB like Mccoy. I highly doubt he averages 5.8 yac if he is the featured back.
I understand PFF's grades. I was just looking at the downside for both teams. Bills deserve a C for a guy they most likely won't re sign and Kiko is a great player if her can bounce back from his ACL injury, which is never a guarantee. Just because AP did it, doesn't mean everyone can do it. Even if Kiko bounces back to his form, the point I am trying to make is if the Eagles were in win it now mode, it doesn't make sense to me to get rid of their best offensive weapon (imo) along with the other players they are apparently letting go (maclin). I can see Chip being a victim of Hubris. The league is too smart, and I don' think he realizes that yet.