Zoltan;1732170 wrote:You are slowly getting to the point. Why is it voyeurism? If a guy can get arrested for using a women's bathroom because they might like what they see, what about a women who might like what they see?

I totally understand you don't want any dude who claims they are now a girl to be in the restroom with your daughter, but then how can you be OK with girls who might be sexually attracted to her?

Are you seriously retarded? There is a big difference in male sexuality and female sexuality in reality; just look at how male teachers are treated in statutory rape cases and female teachers.

Fab4Runner;1732160 wrote:I certainly don't.

Rather irrelevant since you are one person. You mean to tell me if we took a poll of women who would be okay with a male in their locker room/bathroom, that the majority would be okay with it?

No chance.

Jog you are overthinking this. You come across as an idiot on the matter.

Just saw a headline on Huffington Post there is going to be a docuseries called "I Am Cait."

Please tell me again how this isn't for publicity.

Zoltan;1732170 wrote:You are slowly getting to the point. Why is it voyeurism? If a guy can get arrested for using a women's bathroom because they might like what they see, what about a women who might like what they see?

I totally understand you don't want any dude who claims they are now a girl to be in the restroom with your daughter, but then how can you be OK with girls who might be sexually attracted to her?

Are you serious with that last sentence? You wonder how I could be ok with a lesbian sharing a bathroom with my daughter but not a man?

DeyDurkie5;1732175 wrote:Jog you are overthinking this. You come across as an idiot on the matter.

So I am an idiot because my belief is that men should go to men's bathrooms and women should go to women's bathrooms? Was that even a serious comment there durkie?

Raw Dawgin' it;1732180 wrote:Just saw a headline on Huffington Post there is going to be a docuseries called "I Am Cait."

Please tell me again how this isn't for publicity.

So, you're telling me if a tv network came to you and said "Hey we want to document your _____, we'll pay you xxx$(Assuming it's 100,000<)," you wouldn't then at least be tempted to cash in on portraying your personal life?

bigkahuna;1732188 wrote:So, you're telling me if a tv network came to you and said "Hey we want to document your _____, we'll pay you xxx$(Assuming it's 100,000<)," you wouldn't then at least be tempted to cash in on portraying your personal life?

There is already a show about it called "To Catch a Predator"

bigkahuna;1732188 wrote:So, you're telling me if a tv network came to you and said "Hey we want to document your _____, we'll pay you xxx$(Assuming it's 100,000<)," you wouldn't then at least be tempted to cash in on portraying your personal life?

You don't think this is all predetermined? He's done interviews on TV, a magazine shoot, and now this docuseries all because....why? He wants to spread the word on transgender? You're telling me he didn't do all this now because of how popular his family is and that he could make bank from it? Gtfo. If anyone thinks he didn't do this for publicity and money then they have their head in their ass.

How many years before he thinks "Hey, people aren't talking about me as much, I think I'm going to go back to being Bruce" and then goes and makes a shit load more money by "transitioning" back.

Raw Dawgin' it;1732192 wrote:You don't think this is all predetermined? He's done interviews on TV, a magazine shoot, and now this docuseries all because....why? He wants to spread the word on transgender? You're telling me he didn't do all this now because of how popular his family is and that he could make bank from it? Gtfo. If anyone thinks he didn't do this for publicity and money then they have their head in their ass.

As for changing I just think he is doing that because he is just fucking weird. Now, for all the media shit he is doing...yeah THAT is for the publicity and $$$ no doubt about that.

Raw Dawgin' it;1732193 wrote:How many years before he thinks "Hey, people aren't talking about me as much, I think I'm going to go back to being Bruce" and then goes and makes a shit load more money by "transitioning" back.

I actually believe that he has had "the soul of a woman" his entire life and surprisingly, when he talks he makes the most sense out of any of the members of that moronic family.

That being said, absofuckinglutely this is for the publicity and further recognition.

Haven't heard anything from Bruce's/Cait's boys about this change...wonder what their thoughts are? No doubt this is all for publicity...if he was truly wanting to be a chick he would get his junk cut off.

I agree with Raw...it won;t be long and Cait will be Bruce again the circus will go on!

Old Rider;1732201 wrote:Haven't heard anything from Bruce's/Cait's boys about this change...wonder what their thoughts are? No doubt this is all for publicity...if he was truly wanting to be a chick he would get his junk cut off.

I agree with Raw...it won;t be long and Cait will be Bruce again the circus will go on!

Her sons were part of the Diane Sawyer interview, and were also interviewed for the VF piece. It appears to me that all of her children have been mostly supportive.

Fab4Runner;1732206 wrote:Her sons were part of the Diane Sawyer interview, and were also interviewed for the VF piece. It appears to me that all of her children have been mostly supportive.

I can't get on board with using the word "her"

Yeah, same...that's Bruce Jenner. I don't care if he's wearing a dress and has bolt-ons.

Raw Dawgin' it;1732209 wrote:I can't get on board with using the word "her"

Okay.

I am still going to call him Bruce and refer to him as a male. Dgaf how butt hurt feel about that.

Raw Dawgin' it;1732209 wrote:I can't get on board with using the word "her"

Agree. You have man parts, you are a he.

https://celebrity.yahoo.com/blogs/celeb-news/petition-urges-the-international-olympic-committee-to-revoke-caitlyn-jenner-s-olympic-medals-141231280.html

Petition making rounds to revoke all of the Olympic achievements.

"However, this creates somewhat of a problem as Ms. Jenner (as talented as she is) claims that she has always believed herself to be truly female, and therefore, was in violation of committee rules regarding women competing in men's sports and vice versa."

His kids have to be mortified, and making matters worse they can't be anything but supportive publicly (no matter what they really think/feel) or they would face the rath of the militant LBGT movement as being bigots, haters and homophobes.

I read none of them agreed to be anywhere near that reality series thank God, and reportedly wasn't happy about it but wasn't going to make a deal about it.

I was in the car today and was listening to Rush and he was playing an audio clip from the new show coming out in which Bruce comments that he is now "the new normal".

The shit is getting so over the top it is ridiculous, with every news/media outlet I've seen tripping over themselves to show they are the most supportive. It's madness out there.

As a society though there is alot to be learned from watching the militant LBGT movement. Their cracking skulls take no prisoners approach has gotten them any and everything they have wanted the past 10 years, and other movements in this country that look to gain a foothold would do well to study their tactics and how they have managed to be so successful.

Azubuike24;1732223 wrote:https://celebrity.yahoo.com/blogs/celeb-news/petition-urges-the-international-olympic-committee-to-revoke-caitlyn-jenner-s-olympic-medals-141231280.html

Petition making rounds to revoke all of the Olympic achievements.

"However, this creates somewhat of a problem as Ms. Jenner (as talented as she is) claims that she has always believed herself to be truly female, and therefore, was in violation of committee rules regarding women competing in men's sports and vice versa."

Like others have said about calling him Bruce still, if he's got dude parts, he's a dude. I don't know/care what he's got down there now, but I'm pretty sure he had a dick and balls in 1976, so in 1976 he was a dude racing against dudes. If he still has a dick, then he most definitely is still a dude.

IggyPride00;1732225 wrote:His kids have to be mortified, and making matters worse they can't be anything but supportive publicly (no matter what they really think/feel) or they would face the rath of the militant LBGT movement as being bigots, haters and homophobes.
Totally agree with that.

I read none of them agreed to be anywhere near that reality series thank God, and reportedly wasn't happy about it but wasn't going to make a deal about it.

I was in the car today and was listening to Rush and he was playing an audio clip from the new show coming out in which Bruce comments that he is now "the new normal".

The shit is getting so over the top it is ridiculous, with every news/media outlet I've seen tripping over themselves to show they are the most supportive. It's madness out there.
Just wait until he gets that fucking award at the Espy's and they give him a roaring standing erection, i mean, ovation.


As a society though there is alot to be learned from watching the militant LBGT movement. Their cracking skulls take no prisoners approach has gotten them any and everything they have wanted the past 10 years, and other movements in this country that look to gain a foothold would do well to study their tactics and how they have managed to be so successful.

Have to agree with you, for once.

jmog;1732185 wrote:So I am an idiot because my belief is that men should go to men's bathrooms and women should go to women's bathrooms? Was that even a serious comment there durkie?

No your an idiot for not seeing the whole point of this. Do you go to the bathroom and flaunt your dick for everyone to see? No you privately do your thing and be done with it. The only reason it's a big deal is because you think he is going to whip his dick out and flaunt it

IggyPride00;1732225 wrote:His kids have to be mortified, and making matters worse they can't be anything but supportive publicly (no matter what they really think/feel) or they would face the rath of the militant LBGT movement as being bigots, haters and homophobes.

I read none of them agreed to be anywhere near that reality series thank God, and reportedly wasn't happy about it but wasn't going to make a deal about it.

I was in the car today and was listening to Rush and he was playing an audio clip from the new show coming out in which Bruce comments that he is now "the new normal".

The shit is getting so over the top it is ridiculous, with every news/media outlet I've seen tripping over themselves to show they are the most supportive. It's madness out there.

As a society though there is alot to be learned from watching the militant LBGT movement. Their cracking skulls take no prisoners approach has gotten them any and everything they have wanted the past 10 years, and other movements in this country that look to gain a foothold would do well to study their tactics and how they have managed to be so successful.

Please try not to personally gain a foothold. No one needs the "impotent, whiny bitch about everything" movement to get too far off the ground.