Terry_Tate;1704511 wrote:That was my post from last February 3 about it, that's all I could really find. I've been consistent in my opnion at least, lol.

Lol yeah. I think it's a good one I like it too. I think the first tiebreaker should definitely be who won the most weeks but I'd definitely go with that as the 2nd option. The only people who may end up caring about tiebreakers could be the 3 of us fighting for 2nd and the 3 people fighting for the 5th and 6th spots lol.

Iliketurtles;1704517 wrote:Lol yeah. I think it's a good one I like it too. I think the first tiebreaker should definitely be who won the most weeks but I'd definitely go with that as the 2nd option. The only people who may end up caring about tiebreakers could be the 3 of us fighting for 2nd and the 3 people fighting for the 5th and 6th spots lol.

Yeah, most weeks won as first tiebreaker is good then that one I say. That sounds like a good 1-2 for tiebreakers.

I like that tiebreaker lol.

Is the player "MVP" $ for the full NCAA season? Only regular season? Was that ever decided?

Who got player MVP. I had russell. What's he looking like?

ohiobucks1;1705205 wrote:Who got player MVP. I had russell. What's he looking like?

Tis I, at the moment. Denzel Livingston, Incarnate Word.

Yeah, he's got it locked up. Jordan Mickey, Alan Williams and Jameel Warney would need crazy games and Livingston probably a 0 for it to be closer.