I'm pretty sure he gets a 0 with a game. Everyone else is getting their lowest sub when they have a guy who unexpectedly doesn't play, or when they forget to set a lineup, but lost it here to make the change. Pick did neither and Rice has been out for 3 weeks. This wasn't sudden.

So, basically he'll continue to get it unless he posts otherwise? It doesn't matter to me, but now that I look, this would've been the second week without a change. In that case, you're right. It's on him to change the roster.

Yeah no way he gets a sub

Im all for having leeway in this kind of thing. But, he has been out, on record, since the 6th. At some point, make a change.

Well I'm going to be a bit of dick/play devils advocate. I agree that pick6 should get 1 game and zero points for not replacing a guy who was ruled out with injury on January 6th.

But what about Mulva and Josh Scott. Josh Scott missed all of Week 8 with back spasms. But Mulva also kept him in his starting lineup this week. Granted reports were that Scott MIGHT have been ready to play on Saturday there was no gaurantee he would be back this week, yet we let him put in a sub when Scott didn't play. I know this is a little different than Pick6 since in Mulva's case there was a probably at 50/50 chance of his guy playing this week and Pick6's player had been ruled out for the season.

Now I'm not pushing for us to take out Mulva's sub and give him 1 game and zero points. But after how many weeks do we quit letting someone put in an sub when they leave/take the risk of putting someone who has been injured into their starting lineup. Like Josh Scott will probably play this week... but if he doesn't and Mulva leaves him in his lineup do we just let Mulva put in a sub for the 3rd straight week?

I say that if a guy ins't ruled out with an injury for a specific amount of time and you leave him in your lineup for 3 straight weeks and he doesn't play that 3rd week you don't get a sub and get 1 game and 0 points for as many weeks until you take him out.

Scott played in Colorado's only game 2 weeks ago. He hasn't been out consecutively.

Yeah, Id say Mulva is in the clear.

Welp that's what I get for not checking stuff haha. I guess it was Week 7 when he didn't play my mistake.

He's in my lineup again, so the argument might be valid next week.

I agree with turtles, mulva should be given a 0 for every player from here on out.

ABM baby, anybody but mulva

SportsAndLady;1697965 wrote:I agree with turtles, mulva should be given a 0 for every player from here on out.

ABM baby, anybody but mulva

Next year we can just skip right to the part where you all send me money. It would save a lot of time.

I lol'd at ABM.

Too late to take a player who hasn't played yet for a player who has not played yet either?

If not then Azu, please sub out Richard Ross for Speedy Smith.

If its too late then I still hate Richard Ross.

Azu,

Just learned LeVert is out indefinitely.

I want to sub in Jesse Morgan for LeVert.

Thanks

Mulva;1697958 wrote:He's in my lineup again, so the argument might be valid next week.

Lol I'm sure he will play this week all the reports I read was he should have been ready to play on Saturday. I not ready to give you a 0 this week if he doesn't play though but I'm sure many other are haha.

sportswizuhrd;1698080 wrote:Too late to take a player who hasn't played yet for a player who has not played yet either?

If not then Azu, please sub out Richard Ross for Speedy Smith.

If its too late then I still hate Richard Ross.

As long as neither guy had played yet you should be good. Azu has manually adjusted everyone elses roster so far since the lineups lock like 10 minutes before the 1st game of the week.

birddog23;1698111 wrote:Azu,

Just learned LeVert is out indefinitely.

I want to sub in Jesse Morgan for LeVert.

Thanks

He is out for the year, fyi. You could probably drop him for someone else if you want.

Both changes done.