Commander of Awesome;1719988 wrote:I actually recall that as well.
I'm waiting.Pick6;1719986 wrote:sigh. Link?
In the pre-LBJ days, Kyrie wasn't the most popular guy on here due to being injury-prone and a shoot-first PG who didn't make others better. It was a bad team that seemingly didn't have much direction, so the PG gets a certain amount of flack for that. Especially when it seemed his best performances were in places like the All-Star game.Rotinaj;1719999 wrote:A few people on here were on the trade Kyrie train. Kept bringing up him not being a leader and such. Don't remember who though.
I was on the blow the whole thing up and trade everyone train.Rotinaj;1719999 wrote:A few people on here were on the trade Kyrie train. Kept bringing up him not being a leader and such. Don't remember who though.
Good post. Kyrie is an absolute stud when playing next to a facilitator but Kyrie is not in the same class as other PG-facilitators; just like those PG-facilitators are not in Kyrie's class when it comes to scoring ability. On a team with a second facilitator I'd rather take Kyrie but on a team without a facilitator I'd rather have someone like CP3 or John Wall who are better facilitators than scorers.Heretic;1720003 wrote:In the pre-LBJ days, Kyrie wasn't the most popular guy on here due to being injury-prone and a shoot-first PG who didn't make others better. It was a bad team that seemingly didn't have much direction, so the PG gets a certain amount of flack for that. Especially when it seemed his best performances were in places like the All-Star game.
I think it all goes down to how certain players shine on certain types of teams. Kyrie seems best suited to a strong team, but on a weak team, he goes more all-in to get personal stats and develops bad habits. Dion is best on a crap team where he's allowed to chuck up shots to his heart's content, but seems to struggle big-time in actual systems designed to win behind high-percentage looks.
They should rest the big 3 for the rest of the regular season IMOLaley23;1720099 wrote:Cavs clinch the 2 spot, thanks the the Magics win over the Bulls tonight.
I would. Maybe at worst give them about 20 minutes on Friday night then shut them down.Pick6;1720184 wrote:They should rest the big 3 for the rest of the regular season IMO
Unless Blatt is just giving us lip service, I don't think that's the way he operates and I don't think LBJ wants to sit either. I can see them giving KI a night off one game, Love the next & LBJ the next but I'll be surprised if he just shuts them all down for the rest of the season. With Love's back issue, might want to give him a little more time off.Pick6;1720184 wrote:They should rest the big 3 for the rest of the regular season IMO
Lebron was quoted of saying he normally takes about 3 games off every year to rest for the post season. What Lebron wants, Lebron gets. Plain and simple. The dude took a two geek vacation in the middle of the season.BR1986FB;1720192 wrote:Unless Blatt is just giving us lip service, I don't think that's the way he operates and I don't think LBJ wants to sit either. I can see them giving KI a night off one game, Love the next & LBJ the next but I'll be surprised if he just shuts them all down for the rest of the season. With Love's back issue, might want to give him a little more time off.
Then these are very recent comments because I heard an interview with him earlier this week where he said "rest is for when you retire" and that he'd discuss it with the trainers.like_that;1720193 wrote:Lebron was quoted of saying he normally takes about 3 games off every year to rest for the post season. What Lebron wants, Lebron gets. Plain and simple. The dude took a two geek vacation in the middle of the season.
Yesterday.BR1986FB;1720196 wrote:Then these are very recent comments because I heard an interview with him earlier this week where he said "rest is for when you retire" and that he'd discuss it with the trainers.
Didn't think about it until I read this, but it makes a lot of sense. Celtics are sitting at the 7 seed and can't go any higher. Out of the 4 possible teams we'd play in round 1, they'd be the team I'd be most confident against. And I know some on here will be over-the-top confident because that's what they do, and start the whole "we'll destroy everyone we ever play...ever", but I'm a little more of a realest. So rest your guys while letting them cement the 7 seed, I say yes.Dr. KnOiTaLL;1720228 wrote:LeBron James is hinting that he may sit out the next two games, both of which are against the Boston Celtics.
The Cavs have clinched the No. 2 seed in the East and have nothing left to play for. James had a nice game on Wednesday against the Bucks and Brian Windhorst is suggesting he'll sit out the next two, which works in Boston's favor if true. The Celtics and Nets are currently in the playoffs, but the Pacers and Heat are just one game behind them in the standings. The Celtics getting to miss LeBron in two straight games could be a huge win for them in their quest for the playoffs, while LeBron's fantasy owners need to prepare for life without him over the next week. Iman Shumpert could be the guy to benefit most from him missing games.
Agreed. Not saying that I think the Cavs would lose, but these guys are all NBA players. They make millions for a reason, and their ability has brought them to this point. To think that we're going to intimidate our way to a sweep is foolish. When you get to this level, anyone can win on any given day. Heck, the Sixers could be 2-1 against us this year very easily. Instead, a 1-point victory gives us the 2-1 edge, but they're one of the worst teams in the league, and they gave us problems.Benny The Jet;1720296 wrote:I can remember being super-confident against the Magic in 2009 and that sucked. Obviously they're not on the same level, but I'm sure the Mavs were overly-confident in beating a 2 game over .500 team when they were a 1 seed, or the Spurs being a 60 win team losing to an 8 in the first round. If you think the Pacers are an easy walk-through, you're insane.
I agree with you, sleeper. We're a million times better than Boston, Miami, etc. However, doesn't mean they won't snag a win or two. I mean, if we shoot the ball poorly from three, there's a good chance we lose. That's a huge part of our offense and what opens things up for LeBron and Kyrie in the lane. Anyways, we should move on from this. The Cavs are the best team in the East. Let's just hope they play like it so they can rest after game 4 while the other teams in the conference battle for 6 or 7 games.sleeper;1720358 wrote:Intimidate? No, we are just flat out significantly better than the bottom half of the East's playoff teams. If it goes more than 5 games in any of those series, Blatt should be fired immediately.
