E
eersandbeers
Posts: 1,071
Jan 2, 2010 3:34pm
OldDanTucker wrote: Also a couple of the losses for the big were agaist U$C teams that would have crushed any Big East team. While the Big least gets its Bowl wins against Oklahoma teams that cant seem to beat anyone in BCS games and ACC teams
Hilarious.
O
OldDanTucker
Posts: 283
Jan 2, 2010 3:35pm
Prove me wrong theneersandbeers wrote:OldDanTucker wrote: Also a couple of the losses for the big were agaist U$C teams that would have crushed any Big East team. While the Big least gets its Bowl wins against Oklahoma teams that cant seem to beat anyone in BCS games and ACC teams
Hilarious.
E
eersandbeers
Posts: 1,071
Jan 2, 2010 3:36pm
OldDanTucker wrote:eersandbeers wrote:Prove me wrong thenOldDanTucker wrote: Also a couple of the losses for the big were agaist U$C teams that would have crushed any Big East team. While the Big least gets its Bowl wins against Oklahoma teams that cant seem to beat anyone in BCS games and ACC teams
Hilarious.
You can't prove an obviously bias opinion wrong or right. You said the USC teas would have crushed any Big East team (which is an opinion based on nothing, and then you claim that the Oklahoma win wasn't good despite OU widely being recognized as one of the best in the country).
D
DaBrowns41
Posts: 1,304
Jan 2, 2010 3:41pm
That's not the point. The point is that he made a big deal about how USF and NIU were tied.ytownfootball wrote: NIU....NIU...:rolleyes:
I'm just pointing out that USF beat the hell out of NIU in the 2nd half. Not that NIU is anything special.
O
OldDanTucker
Posts: 283
Jan 2, 2010 3:43pm
Then give me your opinion on 1 Big east team that could have beat USC in one of the 2 years I mentioned. Oklahoma may have been favored but you can not ignore the fact that under stoops they have not won a bcs bowl game since 2002.
ytownfootball
Posts: 6,978
Jan 2, 2010 3:44pm
Which is my point, and the point in general about how weak the Big East is and has been. A bowl win against NIU is hardly worthy of note.DaBrowns41 wrote:Not that NIU is anything special.ytownfootball wrote: NIU....NIU...:rolleyes:
E
eersandbeers
Posts: 1,071
Jan 2, 2010 3:45pm
I can't say who would have beat who or whatever. It's stupid to try to compare teams like that as it is mostly about match up and not necessarily opponent.OldDanTucker wrote: Then give me your opinion on 1 Big east team that could have beat USC in one of the 2 years I mentioned. Oklahoma may have been favored but you can not ignore the fact that under stoops they have not won a bcs bowl game since 2002.
Doesn't change how good Oklahoma is/was that one year.
D
DaBrowns41
Posts: 1,304
Jan 2, 2010 3:45pm
No... I understand your point. I'm just explaining that the poster was making that post a bit premature.ytownfootball wrote:Which is my point, and the point in general about how weak the Big East is and has been. A bowl win against NIU is hardly worthy of note.DaBrowns41 wrote:Not that NIU is anything special.ytownfootball wrote: NIU....NIU...:rolleyes:
You don't need to make your point. Everybody knows that NIU is nothing special.
O
OldDanTucker
Posts: 283
Jan 2, 2010 3:46pm
Hilariouseersandbeers wrote:I can't say who would have beat who or whatever. It's stupid to try to compare teams like that as it is mostly about match up and not necessarily opponent.OldDanTucker wrote: Then give me your opinion on 1 Big east team that could have beat USC in one of the 2 years I mentioned. Oklahoma may have been favored but you can not ignore the fact that under stoops they have not won a bcs bowl game since 2002.
Doesn't change how good Oklahoma is/was that one year.
.jpg)
september63
Posts: 5,789
Jan 2, 2010 4:01pm