i have not seen anything official about that helmet.Con_Alma;1654789 wrote:New Browns helmet. When will it be first worn??
Thanks for the link, the cops holding bongs brought the lulz.BR1986FB;1654984 wrote:If this was posted on another thread, my apologies....
http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2014/9/16/6216561/johnny-manziel-cleveland-browns-fans-profile
The muni was amazing, just like it always is. And you can drink, just have to put it in a cup and they are usually pretty cool. Though the police did shut down the "Tambo Tower" 2 story deck these dudes bring each week and do beer bongs from the top. You'll have to swing by the motorhome for a beerlike_that;1655091 wrote:Thanks for the link, the cops holding bongs brought the lulz.
Shook, how was the muni lot? Im flying into cleveland for the buccs game, and my dumbass friend is trying to tell me you aren't allowed to drink in the muni lot anymore. I pwned him with the article BR posted.
I'm down. I am down to meet any OCer who will be at the game. We can discuss that when time comes.shook_17;1655100 wrote:The muni was amazing, just like it always is. And you can drink, just have to put it in a cup and they are usually pretty cool. Though the police did shut down the "Tambo Tower" 2 story deck these dudes bring each week and do beer bongs from the top. You'll have to swing by the motorhome for a beer
RepsDr. KnOiTaLL;1655118 wrote:All I have to say is...
I HATE THE RAVENS :RpS_angry:
Water is wet, my friend...obviously add Pittsburgh, Indianapolis & Cincinnati to that list.Dr. KnOiTaLL;1655118 wrote:All I have to say is...
I HATE THE RAVENS :RpS_angry:
No.SportsAndLady;1655179 wrote:Would anyone want Geno smith on this team?
He's having a pretty good start to the year. I remember the OC being pretty split on him, and I know I took a lot of shit for saying to take him in the first round of 2013.
His stats don't blow you away but he's played pretty well just watching his games. I unfortunately was with jets fans Sunday who wanted to watch jets packers over the broncos chiefs game. Just looked pretty good to me, and I like his ability to run (had a rushing td).like_that;1655183 wrote:No.
What part of his stats makes you think he has had a good start?
I think you are just used to the pile of shit we have had to watch the last 12 years at the QB position (especially with weeden). He was 50% last week with under 200 yards and an int. Nothing about that screams to me that we should have drafted him. I will take my chances on JFF.SportsAndLady;1655185 wrote:His stats don't blow you away but he's played pretty well just watching his games. I unfortunately was with jets fans Sunday who wanted to watch jets packers over the broncos chiefs game. Just looked pretty good to me, and I like his ability to run (had a rushing td).
I didn't see his first game, but he had a near 100 QB rating and was 23/28.
That's funny that you continually choose to single out Weeden. Yes, he sucked but he was the best we had since Derek Anderson's fluke 2007. Better than Frye, better than McCoy, etc, etc. He sucked but statistically he was probably the Browns best QB since Anderson & Couch. That being said, I agree with your comment about being used to shit at QB.like_that;1655188 wrote:I think you are just used to the pile of shit we have had to watch the last 12 years at the QB position (especially with weeden). He was 50% last week with under 200 yards and an int. Nothing about that screams to me that we should have drafted him. I will take my chances on JFF.
Edit: his week 1 performance was against the raiders. Weeden looked like a pro bowler vs the raiders lol.
Here's the difference:BR1986FB;1655193 wrote:That's funny that you continually choose to single out Weeden. Yes, he sucked but he was the best we had since Derek Anderson's fluke 2007. Better than Frye, better than McCoy, etc, etc. He sucked but statistically he was probably the Browns best QB since Anderson & Couch. That being said, I agree with your comment about being used to shit at QB.
Fair enough. Just throwing out the question.like_that;1655188 wrote:I think you are just used to the pile of shit we have had to watch the last 12 years at the QB position (especially with weeden). He was 50% last week with under 200 yards and an int. Nothing about that screams to me that we should have drafted him. I will take my chances on JFF.
Edit: his week 1 performance was against the raiders. Weeden looked like a pro bowler vs the raiders lol.
Oh, I agree but sucking is sucking regardless of where drafted. Weeden was a deer in headlights, no doubt.SportsAndLady;1655195 wrote:Here's the difference:
Where was frye drafted? Where was McCoy drafted?
His best game last year was actually against the Mike Pettine/Jim O'Neil led Buffalo Bills defense.Weeden looked like a pro bowler vs the raiders lol.
Yes....but no one should get defensive about a browns fan continuously ripping on our first round QB that took half a season to show us how horrible he really is.BR1986FB;1655198 wrote:Oh, I agree but sucking is sucking regardless of where drafted. Weeden was a deer in headlights, no doubt.
A defense that has been pretty damn good since the start of the 3rd quarter against Pittsburgh. If you think they were going to shut out New Orleans and Drew Brees, you're delusional. Oh yeah, forgot who I was replying to. :rolleyes:IggyPride00;1655199 wrote:His best game last year was actually against the Mike Pettine/Jim O'Neil led Buffalo Bills defense.
We are currently 31st in the league in total defense.
Coincidence?
In a league where the rules continuously benefit QBs, yeah I am going to single out our most recent starting QB who was wasted with a first round pick.BR1986FB;1655193 wrote:That's funny that you continually choose to single out Weeden. Yes, he sucked but he was the best we had since Derek Anderson's fluke 2007. Better than Frye, better than McCoy, etc, etc. He sucked but statistically he was probably the Browns best QB since Anderson & Couch. That being said, I agree with your comment about being used to shit at QB.
