gut;1626802 wrote:Gay marriage is what separates us from the commies....#'Murica

isadore;1626132 wrote:Gosh a ruddies although you may trivialize it marriage is a basic human right. People who deny a basic human right are the bigots, not the people who argue for it. The change of opinion on the issue are a sign society can evolve to the better and more tolerant. On gay marriage and many other issues that better our country the Tea Party opposes.

sleeper;1627182 wrote:Gay people can still marry someone of the opposite sex. They have that right, they choose to not use it. What's next? People having the basic human right of marrying their dog? It doesn't affect you so why do you care?

Heretic;1627183 wrote:Humor = That moment where Sleeper suddenly starts sounding just like a proud bible-thumping religious right member.

Tiernan;1627400 wrote:I believe that is the whole point you dickweeds...gay people don't want to be considered "special" they want to be considered the same as non-gays. It's idiots like Perry that separate them from the majority labeling them "special".

jmog;1627404 wrote:They already are considered equal with respect to marriage. They have the same available marriage partners by law as any heterosexual. They are asking to add to that possible list of partners.

Tiernan;1627445 wrote:^^^
my God you're as damn dumb as Perry. Who (or What) somebody has sex with is not the business of the govt in any way shape or form.

Cue the idiotic pedophile comments from the morons & bible beaters.

Tiernan;1627455 wrote:People like Jmog & Sleeper are afraid lesbians are going to reduce their very limited female target pool even more. Relax dumbasses...your chances of landing a hot bi-woman are remote (like Yukon remote).

jmog;1627519 wrote:I actually think civil unions should be allowed and marriages as long as civil suits against pastors who refuse to marry gay couples for religious reasons are outlawed.

I agree that the government should not be involved in marriage at all.

jmog;1627520 wrote:You don't know what I have "landed" and I don't think you know my stance on homosexuality at all. I am actually for gay marriage with a main stipulation (stated above). I was just stating the obvious fact that they currently have the same rights with respect to marriage.

And how do you know that my wife isn't bi and we haven't had 3somes with other women? You don't know jack about me but your attitude shows for a lack of logical thinking.

sleeper;1627564 wrote:Have banged jmog's wife. Can confirm bi.

jmog;1627567 wrote:Now that's funny, best you can do is a I banged your wife joke? What's next? Your mom's so fat joke?

sleeper;1627564 wrote:Have banged jmog's wife. Can confirm bi.

isadore;1627721 wrote:finally a 100% successful reparative therapy for female heterosexuality, sex with sleeper.

Tiernan;1627445 wrote:
Cue the idiotic pedophile comments from the morons & bible beaters.

cruiser_96;1627808 wrote:Why are they idiotic comments? http://m.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/08/what-can-be-done-about-pedophilia/279024/

jmog;1627969 wrote:We are only a couple decades away from pedophilia being accepted and protected as a sexual orientation. That's not a popular thing to say and many on here will bash me saying I am comparing homosexuality to pedophilia (which is not true). But with the ever increasing liberal social agenda it will happen eventually.

What at I just said, if it was said about homosexuality a few decades ago it would be just as criticized as then as the same statements about pedophilia would be now.