like_that
Posts: 26,625
May 1, 2014 10:13pm
I can argue DA was better than weeden. Also he was a pro bowl alternate...rydawg5;1611802 wrote:Derek Anderson was a pro bowler, so should we sign him too?
We signed two QBs to very small contracts because the only QB we had on the roster is a QB recovering from ACL rehab. Not to mention the players probably thought weeden was an incompetent QB and they are happy he is gone. I don't understand how this is confusing to anybody.
R
rydawg5
Posts: 2,639
May 1, 2014 10:19pm
I'm not confused. I was just stating a fact that we canned Weeded but didn't replace him with anyone better.like_that;1611805 wrote:I can argue DA was better than weeden. Also he was a pro bowl alternate...
We signed two QBs to very small contracts because the only QB we had on the roster is a QB recovering from ACL rehab. Not to mention the players probably thought weeden was an incompetent QB and they are happy he is gone. I don't understand how this is confusing to anybody.
I believe Young was an "alternate" in at least 1 of his pro bowls as well, but anyway... You defending Vince Young like his is still "that guy" from 2006 leads me to believe that you are the confused one.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
May 1, 2014 10:23pm
You're the one who brought up Young. Derp.rydawg5;1611806 wrote:I'm not confusing. I was just stating a fact that we canned Weeded but didn't replace him with anyone better.
I believe Young was an "alternate" in at least 1 of his pro bowls as well, but anyway... You defending Vince Young like his is still "that guy" from 2006 leads me to believe that you are the confused one.
Anyway, you can stick to coming up with arguments on why weeden should still be on our roster competing to be the third QB (LOL). I will stick to discussing players who actually will get major playing time. Thanks.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 1, 2014 10:23pm
Who gives a fuck? It's our 3rd string QB for Christ sake.rydawg5;1611801 wrote:I guess the "point" was we got rid of a guy who would have been a better qb than 2 guys we just signed for backup qbs?
R
rydawg5
Posts: 2,639
May 1, 2014 10:24pm
like_that;1611807 wrote:You're the one who brought up Young. Derp.
Anyway, you can stick to coming up with arguments on why weeden should still be on our roster competing to be the third QB (LOL). I will stick to discussing players who actually will get major playing time. Thanks.
So moving on to "major playing time players" are you in love with Mcgahee because of his pro bowls or do you think someone new will take the reign as starting RB even without the Pro Bowl Credentials?
R
rydawg5
Posts: 2,639
May 1, 2014 10:24pm
After the first 2 get hurt it will be our #1SportsAndLady;1611808 wrote:Who gives a fuck? It's our 3rd string QB for Christ sake.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 1, 2014 10:24pm
Yes that's generally how it works.rydawg5;1611810 wrote:After the first 2 get hurt it will be our #1
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
May 1, 2014 10:37pm
McGahee isn't even on the team this year.rydawg5;1611809 wrote:So moving on to "major playing time players" are you in love with Mcgahee because of his pro bowls or do you think someone new will take the reign as starting RB even without the Pro Bowl Credentials?
So let me get this straight..... You think that the Browns should've kept Weeden, with his high salary, to be the #3 QB, ahead of signing 2 QB's to contracts that don't equal his, not to mention are Younger, and have had more career success?
R
rydawg5
Posts: 2,639
May 1, 2014 11:30pm
Nope not saying we should have kept him, not sure where I said that. But I did say we downgraded for backups with Vince Young and Thigpen.HighRoller74;1611812 wrote:McGahee isn't even on the team this year.
So let me get this straight..... You think that the Browns should've kept Weeden, with his high salary, to be the #3 QB, ahead of signing 2 QB's to contracts that don't equal his, not to mention are Younger, and have had more career success?
For future posts, are you always going to put words in my mouth or is this like a one-time thing?
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
May 1, 2014 11:53pm
Did I put words in your mouth or ask you a question to understand you stance on this matter?
Just trying to understand your point of view.
Just trying to understand your point of view.
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
May 1, 2014 11:54pm
But back to the subject at hand. As really don't feel like arguing on the internet.
I personally don't think its a downgrade, due to Weeden never showing he could be a competent player in the NFL. Where as the other two have had a moderate amount of success. And at the same time, I don't really think either guy will be on the roster opening day.
I personally don't think its a downgrade, due to Weeden never showing he could be a competent player in the NFL. Where as the other two have had a moderate amount of success. And at the same time, I don't really think either guy will be on the roster opening day.
R
rydawg5
Posts: 2,639
May 1, 2014 11:56pm
HighRoller74;1611823 wrote:But back to the subject at hand. As really don't feel like arguing on the internet.
I personally don't think its a downgrade, due to Weeden never showing he could be a competent player in the NFL. Where as the other two have had a moderate amount of success. And at the same time, I don't really think either guy will be on the roster opening day.
Fair Enough.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
May 2, 2014 12:49am
Weeden is 30+, 3rd string bs are supposed to be developmental guys. FW fails again, lolfail
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
May 2, 2014 1:32am
I like Teddy too but man he just doesn't blow you away ya know? I think he'll be another Sam Bradford typeFootwedge;1611734 wrote:Wrong. Gruden has all but said that Bridgewater should be off the table.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
May 2, 2014 4:58am
It was actually rydawg who failed this time around.Commander of Awesome;1611832 wrote:Weeden is 30+, 3rd string bs are supposed to be developmental guys. FW fails again, lolfail