dlazz;1580536 wrote:Your Internet price isn't going to go down in that scenario.
Read COA's link. It sums it up pretty well
I understand what they are doing. Maybe "my prices won't go up as much" is more accurate, but the fact is the cable companies are going to get their money one way or another, and if people are stealing content I'm quite happy to let them pay for it one way or the other, as opposed to me subsidizing their "free content". The US is a big, big country that is not densely populated outside the bigger metropolitans - that infrastructure costs a lot of money and isn't going to be price competitive with what it costs to cover Seoul.
This is pretty basic. If you cut the cord and watch a bunch of content on Netflix, then charging Netflix more (which they pass on to you) is one way to recover those lost revenues. That's just one option available to them, alternatively they could raise internet prices for everyone, or go to metered service, among other things. And they already kind of adjust for that, offering bundled services that heavily discounts the individual pieces.
I don't really get what is so horrible or shocking that a cable company would have a competitive response to Netflix using that cable company's own services to siphon revenues from them. I don't like the tactics, but simply put there is a price/share agreement that maximizes revenues for both parties. I agree it's unfortunate the consumer suffers, but it takes two to play this game - it isn't just the big, bad cable companies as the culprit here.