ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Dec 13, 2013 3:24pm
Quote it. What year?Laley23;1553007 wrote:I found the rulebook I had when I ref'd and it states only 2 should be rewarded. Maybe they changed it. Or maybe Scott Forr is a lying POS!!! Lol
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Dec 13, 2013 10:49pm
When I get to a computer I will.ernest_t_bass;1553015 wrote:Quote it. What year?
I can say for certain Scott Forr told us that though.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Dec 13, 2013 11:17pm
Haha! I was joking about the 3-pt signal (assumed the camera just didn't pick it up).
Learned something I guess. I kind of understand the logic, but a somewhat bizarre rule. Not sure I agree with it.
Learned something I guess. I kind of understand the logic, but a somewhat bizarre rule. Not sure I agree with it.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Dec 14, 2013 12:15am
Well, I left it in the car. But, what I was thinking of only applies to a shot that bounces, apparently (like a full court shot).
What the guy who was "teaching" us said you only get awarded 3 pts for a try towards goal from behind the arc. Because that wasnt a try, it wouldnt be awarded 3pts.
What the guy who was "teaching" us said you only get awarded 3 pts for a try towards goal from behind the arc. Because that wasnt a try, it wouldnt be awarded 3pts.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Dec 14, 2013 12:18am
Sounds like you owe a certain coach an apology and a beer.Laley23;1553152 wrote:Well, I left it in the car. But, what I was thinking of only applies to a shot that bounces, apparently (like a full court shot).
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Dec 14, 2013 10:37am
Doesn't have to be a try (unless you're talking about the bouncing).Laley23;1553152 wrote:Well, I left it in the car. But, what I was thinking of only applies to a shot that bounces, apparently (like a full court shot).
What the guy who was "teaching" us said you only get awarded 3 pts for a try towards goal from behind the arc. Because that wasnt a try, it wouldnt be awarded 3pts.