sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 26, 2013 2:47pm
Toledo BG is pretty fierce.Mohican00;1543596 wrote:it has been replaced?
C
carmen
Posts: 109
Nov 26, 2013 2:57pm
"the game" hasnt had any relevance since 2006. It hasnt decided anything since the 2006 game either. Most people dont watch it anymore unless they are a fan of the teams.Mohican00;1543596 wrote:it has been replaced?
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 26, 2013 3:08pm
See the Iron Bowl since inception.carmen;1543628 wrote:"the game" hasnt had any relevance since 2006. It hasnt decided anything since the 2006 game either. Most people dont watch it anymore unless they are a fan of the teams.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 26, 2013 3:12pm
carmen;1543628 wrote:"the game" hasnt had any relevance since 2006. It hasnt decided anything since the 2006 game either. Most people dont watch it anymore unless they are a fan of the teams.
Just because it's "not relevant" to the FBS landscape doesn't mean it's not relevant to football fans nationally...let's see what the ratings are after the game, deal?
Mohican00
Posts: 3,394
Nov 26, 2013 3:15pm
preciselyvball10set;1543640 wrote:Just because it's "not relevant" to the FBS landscape doesn't mean it's not relevant to football fans nationally...let's see what the ratings are after the game, deal?
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 26, 2013 3:18pm
The ratings will likely be in the top 5 for the season despite Michigan being terrible.vball10set;1543640 wrote:Just because it's "not relevant" to the FBS landscape doesn't mean it's not relevant to football fans nationally...let's see what the ratings are after the game, deal?
C
carmen
Posts: 109
Nov 26, 2013 3:19pm
I bet there will be 3 games or more this year that has higher viewership. Clem vs UGA, Ore vs Stan, and Bama vs LSU. You can toss in FSU vs Clem and Bama vs Auburn too.vball10set;1543640 wrote:Just because it's "not relevant" to the FBS landscape doesn't mean it's not relevant to football fans nationally...let's see what the ratings are after the game, deal?
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Nov 26, 2013 3:24pm
Perhaps, but the thread is about rivalries. None of those qualify.carmen;1543652 wrote:I bet there will be 3 games or more this year that has higher viewership. Clem vs UGA, Ore vs Stan, and Bama vs LSU. You can toss in FSU vs Clem and Bama vs Auburn too.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Nov 26, 2013 3:24pm
Yeah of all those games I only watched Stan/Ore. Bama Auburn will probably be #1 this year(for regular season), Ore/Stan will probably be #2 and OSU/Mich will be #3. Not bad for an irrelevant game lol.carmen;1543652 wrote:I bet there will be 3 games or more this year that has higher viewership. Clem vs UGA, Ore vs Stan, and Bama vs LSU. You can toss in FSU vs Clem and Bama vs Auburn too.
dwccrew
Posts: 7,817
Nov 26, 2013 3:28pm
That is an interesting stat, I looked it up and it appears that OSU hasn't beaten tsun by more than 11 in AA since 1961 (OSU won 50-20)JU-ICE;1543003 wrote:An interesting tidbit about the -12 spread is that OSU has not beaten UM by more that 11 points at the Big House since 1969. I fully expect that streak to end this year.
2007 it had relevance. Had Michigan won, they'd have represented the Big Ten in the BCS and OSU wouldn't have gone to the BCS Champsionship game.carmen;1543628 wrote:"the game" hasnt had any relevance since 2006. It hasnt decided anything since the 2006 game either. Most people dont watch it anymore unless they are a fan of the teams.
C
carmen
Posts: 109
Nov 26, 2013 3:29pm
I was answering what I quoted.queencitybuckeye;1543654 wrote:Perhaps, but the thread is about rivalries. None of those qualify.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 26, 2013 3:43pm
carmen;1543652 wrote:I bet there will be 3 games or more this year that has higher viewership. Clem vs UGA, Ore vs Stan, and Bama vs LSU. You can toss in FSU vs Clem and Bama vs Auburn too.
wtf does that have to do with my post? I made a statement, and the ratings will support my statement..capiche'?
M
MontyBrunswick
Nov 26, 2013 4:32pm
As of right now, line has moved to -14.5osu45804;1542419 wrote:Spread is OSU -12
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Nov 26, 2013 6:56pm
Dlazz you gotta change that avi. Its like I automatically dismiss your posts because I see that stupid moron in your picture
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Nov 26, 2013 8:00pm
Carlos Hyde is averaging 7.7 yards per carry. That's pretty crazy for someone averaging 18 carries a game.
M
MontyBrunswick
Nov 26, 2013 10:44pm
Mark May offers well-rounded and balanced college football analysis. : thumbup:Midstate01;1543755 wrote:Dlazz you gotta change that avi. Its like I automatically dismiss your posts because I see that stupid moron in your picture
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Nov 26, 2013 11:19pm
You're forgetting OSU and UM have the two largest fanbases in college football. That helpscarmen;1543652 wrote:I bet there will be 3 games or more this year that has higher viewership. Clem vs UGA, Ore vs Stan, and Bama vs LSU. You can toss in FSU vs Clem and Bama vs Auburn too.
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Nov 27, 2013 1:24am
[video=youtube;R05Q01P8U0A][/video]
Looks like plenty of people showed up.
Looks like plenty of people showed up.
rrfan
Posts: 1,922
Nov 27, 2013 7:45am
Reps!!Midstate01;1543755 wrote:Dlazz you gotta change that avi. Its like I automatically dismiss your posts because I see that stupid moron in your picture
rrfan
Posts: 1,922
Nov 27, 2013 7:46am
And not mentioned for the Doak Walker Award!se-alum;1543778 wrote:Carlos Hyde is averaging 7.7 yards per carry. That's pretty crazy for someone averaging 18 carries a game.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 27, 2013 8:09am
se-alum;1543884 wrote:
Looks like plenty of people showed up.
http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?43032-The-Ohio-State-University-tsun-Greatest-Rivalry-in-CFB&p=1543344&viewfull=1#post1543344
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Nov 27, 2013 8:22am
Except the one you posted was Monday, and the one he's talking about was Tuesday.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Nov 27, 2013 8:29am
SorryGoChiefs;1543913 wrote:Except the one you posted was Monday, and the one he's talking about was Tuesday.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Nov 27, 2013 9:04am
Travesty of ESPN predjudice that Hyde isnt mentioned for the Walker Award. They will give it to Johnny Fuckup no matter what the actual voting numbers are.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Nov 27, 2013 9:18am
Tiernan;1543921 wrote:Travesty of ESPN predjudice that Hyde isnt mentioned for the Walker Award. They will give it to Johnny Fuckup no matter what the actual voting numbers are.
Damn you are stupid