like_that
Posts: 26,625
Sep 23, 2013 5:39pm
No one wants that reds reverse jinx bullshit in here. GFY.Terry_Tate;1506048 wrote:Browns win 3-0. Gordon and Cameron suck and Browns get a late INT to put them in field goal range.
GOONx19
Posts: 7,147
Sep 23, 2013 5:44pm
Go Brownies.
Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
Sep 23, 2013 5:48pm
Bengals win 30-0 as Josh Gordon and Jordan Cameron are held to zero catches.like_that;1506058 wrote:No one wants that reds reverse jinx bullshit in here. GFY.
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Sep 23, 2013 5:51pm
Maybe not. Since apparently pacman was arrestedCommander of Awesome;1505958 wrote:Zac Jackson ‏@FSOhioZJackson now
Bengals may be without Leon Hall (hamstring) for matchup with Josh Gordon Sunday. Gordon and Pacman will have plenty to talk about.
yes please
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Sep 23, 2013 6:00pm
Ike Taylor held Green to 6 rec for 41 yds and no TD...this is with a shitty non-existent pass rush never touching Dalton. Seemed like about 20 yards were after the catch on missed tackles.
Bengals 31
Browns 23
Bengals 31
Browns 23
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Sep 23, 2013 6:07pm
Browns win 40-3.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Sep 23, 2013 6:37pm
Nate Ulrich ‏@NateUlrichABJ 7m #Browns' Phil Taylor on Adrian Peterson’s tweet: "He can say what he wants, but he wasn’t a factor in the game"
That's a pwn.
That's a pwn.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Sep 23, 2013 6:57pm
Can't see us only scoring 40.Rotinaj;1506083 wrote:Browns win 40-3.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Sep 23, 2013 7:01pm
Can't see the Browns giving up that many pts. Might be the bengals total yardage.Rotinaj;1506083 wrote:Browns win 40-3.
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
Sep 23, 2013 7:02pm
I was being conservative. Didn't want to give all the Bengals fans hurt feelz.wes_mantooth;1506098 wrote:Can't see us only scoring 40.
ohiobucks1
Posts: 4,915
Sep 23, 2013 7:15pm
35-27 Browns
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Sep 23, 2013 8:26pm
Return of the Bungals: Pacman strikes back
http://www.foxsportsohio.com/nfl/cincinnati-bengals/story/Pacman-in-trouble-again?blockID=943463&feedID=3724
http://www.foxsportsohio.com/nfl/cincinnati-bengals/story/Pacman-in-trouble-again?blockID=943463&feedID=3724
shook_17
Posts: 3,023
Sep 23, 2013 9:22pm
Browns lose. Same shit different year. 4-12 chud will be fired after this game. On to a new 5 year plan
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Sep 24, 2013 8:24am
Week 3 is over. Should this be pinned at the top of the page?
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Sep 24, 2013 10:41am
In other news, the sun rose. What a total life fuck-up.Midstate01;1506074 wrote:Maybe not. Since apparently pacman was arrested
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Sep 24, 2013 3:40pm
Pacman been pretty good for us this year.
Bengals 34 browns 16
Bengals 34 browns 16
Big_Mirg_ZHS
Posts: 2,079
Sep 24, 2013 4:11pm
Thinking about going to this one as well. Hopefully it will go better than last year when me and @gerb131 went
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Sep 24, 2013 5:16pm
Yea it was a bust lolBig_Mirg_ZHS;1506612 wrote:Thinking about going to this one as well. Hopefully it will go better than last year when me and @gerb131 went
When I get back I'm gonna try get a game in
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Sep 24, 2013 6:51pm
Pacman's charge was a misdemeanor, and while there aren't many details, I have a feeling a lot of it had to do with the fact that he is Pacman Jones and anything involving him and the law will make big headlines.
I'm guessing nothing happens at all.
I'm guessing nothing happens at all.
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Sep 24, 2013 10:33pm
Bengals win this one pulling away.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Sep 25, 2013 10:30am
IF IF IF Chud really doesnt know who he will start I think that he is a fool.
I am thinking he knew the second the game was over whom he was starting next week, but for "competitive" or whatever reasons he was not going to commit
I am thinking he knew the second the game was over whom he was starting next week, but for "competitive" or whatever reasons he was not going to commit
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Sep 25, 2013 10:32am
This is just stupid. Like the Bengals don't have film on both QB's. So dumb when coaches do this.thavoice;1507088 wrote:IF IF IF Chud really doesnt know who he will start I think that he is a fool.
I am thinking he knew the second the game was over whom he was starting next week, but for "competitive" or whatever reasons he was not going to commit
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Sep 25, 2013 10:35am
Oh I know it is stupid. Other than really not knowing whom would start then why not commit to the guy who actually interjected energy into the offense and won a game?BR1986FB;1507090 wrote:This is just stupid. Like the Bengals don't have film on both QB's. So dumb when coaches do this.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Sep 25, 2013 10:37am
This "element of surprise" might work if Chud came out of nowhere and started a first time starter who the opponent had no film on. So dumb when coaches do this thinking they have an advantage.thavoice;1507093 wrote:Oh I know it is stupid. Other than really not knowing whom would start then why not commit to the guy who actually interjected energy into the offense and won a game?
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Sep 25, 2013 10:56am
Hoyer is starting.