Jack Clark said that ten years ago that Pujols trainer told him that he shot up Albert. Pujols is suing. Remember when his name was rumored to be in the Mitchell report and wasn't? So...doy ou believe him

I think he's probably clean but anyone who doesn't think there is even a chance he used is foolish IMO.

Don't believe he's clean for a second. I pretty much thing every ball player from that era is guilty though. Could have asked me about Ronnie Belliard and I'd have the same opinion.

He might be clean now, but wasn't before they started cracking down.

Don't know about PED use, believe him in the specific case.

I would not be surprised if anyone's name came up in a conversation regarding PED's. There are so many variations and so many circumstances that would be attractive to a user, it'd be real tough to at least not consider it. JMO.

I don't necessarily believe him, but I believe him more than Jack Clark.

Well he did do what we would all expect someone who is totally innocent to do. Totally denied it, talked how he would not be able to look his family in the eye, and threatened a lawsuit. Either he is innocent, or he believes that since he wasn't in the Mitchell report, or any other reports, that he is as good as gold.