ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
Sep 14, 2013 10:42pm
Good win, but man, the defense is still a problem.
Put them in big games with a quality offense and I am sure sure they can win it.
But, they covered, with a backup QB, wooo
Put them in big games with a quality offense and I am sure sure they can win it.
But, they covered, with a backup QB, wooo

Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Sep 14, 2013 11:37pm
I thought we got some good pressure on the QB. Gave up too many big plays though it seemed. Overall good game.

Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Sep 15, 2013 1:39am
Me and a buddy were talking how basically OSU if it had Tressel still would never win a title in todays game. I think tonight is a great example of that, playing Tressel ball we would have lost to Cal. His style would not work at all against this no-huddle attack where teams are scoring 40 points with 20 minutes of offense. No way do we score 52 if we had JT and JB at the helm

Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Sep 15, 2013 2:41am
In Tressel's final season, Ohio State scored 35+ points nine times, and averaged 49.25 ppg in non-conference play.

Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Sep 15, 2013 3:04am

V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Sep 15, 2013 7:43am
3-0

SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Sep 15, 2013 5:51pm
No response from classyMulva;1500639 wrote:In Tressel's final season, Ohio State scored 35+ points nine times, and averaged 49.25 ppg in non-conference play.

Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Sep 15, 2013 5:53pm
Yeah but could this group score that much. I feel like Braxton would not do very well in that offense but who knows

LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 15, 2013 6:24pm
Am I the only one who watched cal vs northwestern and realize that 100 plays, 500 yards and 30 points is just what Cal is going to do this year?

Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
Sep 15, 2013 6:30pm
Nope, they did pretty much what I expected.LJ;1500925 wrote:Am I the only one who watched cal vs northwestern and realize that 100 plays, 500 yards and 30 points is just what Cal is going to do this year?
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Sep 15, 2013 6:42pm
The only real problem I have with the Buckeyes so far this season is the amount of penalties they've incurred so far. I'm not sure where they rank nationally, but here's where they stand in the B1G....not good:
PENALTIES | G | No. | Yards | Avg/G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Minnesota | 3 | 7 | 52 | 17.3 |
2. | Penn State | 3 | 14 | 99 | 33.0 |
3. | Purdue | 3 | 19 | 147 | 49.0 |
4. | Michigan | 3 | 18 | 150 | 50.0 |
Northwestern | 3 | 16 | 150 | 50.0 | |
6. | Wisconsin | 3 | 16 | 152 | 50.7 |
7. | Iowa | 3 | 20 | 155 | 51.7 |
8. | Illinois | 3 | 19 | 159 | 53.0 |
9. | Indiana | 3 | 18 | 162 | 54.0 |
10. | Michigan State | 3 | 17 | 188 | 62.7 |
11. | Nebraska | 3 | 23 | 219 | 73.0 |
12. | Ohio State | 3 | 24 | 225 | 75.0 |

LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 15, 2013 7:06pm
I believe cal scored 2 TDs after OSU defensive pentalies
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Sep 16, 2013 7:56am
Cal's offense is certainly better than half the B1G, probably better than that.

Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Sep 16, 2013 1:03pm
We were pretty close. I side on the other side of the endzone about 20 rows up.Midstate01;1500640 wrote:

Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Sep 16, 2013 1:19pm
lol, yeah. The "OMG, a team built purely around a fast-paced offense got yards and points against OSU?!?!? It's the end!!!!!" crowd is cute. Scorewise, things were pretty much about what I expected except for...LJ;1500925 wrote:Am I the only one who watched cal vs northwestern and realize that 100 plays, 500 yards and 30 points is just what Cal is going to do this year?
I thought I read it was 10 points (TD and FG), but I could be wrong. Either way, that's the only concerning thing from the game for me -- key mistakes giving teams a chance to keep drives alive and score points. That's the sort of thing that needs corrected, as a good team will make those mistakes hurt badly.LJ;1500941 wrote:I believe cal scored 2 TDs after OSU defensive pentalies