BoatShoes;1470593 wrote:lol...coming from you of all people. It's funny, I mentioned the first part about how people would complain if I provided a communist as a source, etc. with you as one of the posters in mind...as you constantly levy personal attacks against me and other posters...rather than attack the argument as well as demean my sources as biased/not good (even though they are always better than mises.org). If I posted an article from Think Progress, DailyKos, etc. you would be the first one on here lambasting the source. It should've been clear I was mentioning it as a caveat.

And, in case you did not notice, after I made my initial point that I did not think it was a good source and that I would be dismissed if I provided a similar ideological source, I attacked the arguments made in the article in the subsequent points.

I argued that the author's opinion on how markets work in healthcare are suspect based on evidence from Nobel Prize winning article by a neoclassical economist. I also questioned some of the facts presented in the article to justify his position.

Considering how much you attack me personally (rather than my arguments) perhaps we will take it as a concession from your quote in this thread that the facts are often against you when debating with me. :thumbup:

Your fallacy is that you are not a source. You may be (probably not but not impossible) an expert on something, but not in anything discussed on this forum. The opinion cited in the OP's link has validity whether you agree or not. You do not have the bona fides to get the same respect.

BoatShoes do you still work at Hungry Howies?

queencitybuckeye;1471119 wrote:Your fallacy is that you are not a source. You may be (probably not but not impossible) an expert on something, but not in anything discussed on this forum. The opinion cited in the OP's link has validity whether you agree or not. You do not have the bona fides to get the same respect.

1. You must've missed the fallacy because even if what you say is true and I'm "not a source" (which is logically not true because the person making an argument is a source) you're conveniently forgetting that my point was that you regularly dismiss sources and evidence that are just as valid, if not moreso, than the source provided by the OP. Not only do you attack me personally (as you do again in this post) you attack the sources I provide. In fact, you've dismissed Kenneth Arrow in the past as some left wing source that agrees with my worldview and that is simply not true...refusing to engage in constructive debate. You regularly attack sources that are not me but that I use as evidence for my arguments, rather than the arguments themselves. In fact you rarely ever engage in constructive debate here so I wonder why you even post on this forum.

You regularly attack sources who aren't me.

And, that was my point in my reply to Jmog. I wasn't dismissing his source and engaged the arguments presented therein...I just said my peace about how folks would respond if I had a similar source. You are exhibit A.

2. When did I say I was an "expert"? Are you an "expert"? What does it matter if we're experts? How do you know who is and isn't an expert at anything on this forum...it is an anonymous internet forum. Surely you see that you yourself are engaging the very fallacy you accuse me of by just dismissing poster's arguments because they are not "experts" in your opinion and refusing to engage in constructive debate over the arguments made. A "non-expert" is just as worthy of having his arguments engaged on the merits as an expert. And, like I said, when I provide evidence from people who are experts...you just dismiss those as well...doing the same thing you accuse me of doing.

3.

The opinion cited in the OP's link has validity whether you agree or not.

After mentioning how I would be treated for providing a similar source, I treated the opinion in the link as a valid opinion and engaged the arguments made therein on the merits...which is something that you do not do, ever. Rather, you do things like claim that I "do not have the bona fides" and am not worthy of respectful discourse. Very Constructive. Maybe one day I'll be cool enough to troll posters I don't like with constant attacks on his person on an internet forum. :thumbup:

Belly35;1471241 wrote:BoatShoes do you still work at Hungry Howies?

Weird you asked this question twice. Like I said, they fired me. My liberalism was rubbing off into the cheese and it just started sucking profits out of the enterprise. But it all works out because I'm earning enough cash from my hand job biz that I can claim up to the EITC as still get the extra cash from teh taxpayer!

[http://craigslistinfolinks.com/ml9 canada goose jakker tilbud] [http://www.imarto.com/v/1hx1z Canada Goose jakker] cheap Canada Goose Parka canada goose down [http://sofasay.com/app/link/897 http://posco.com.br/yourls/kve billig canada goose jakke] [http://nwspprs.com/36km canada goose coats] my playing system is undoubtedly routinely as used by military, gaol, law enforcement section to operate or a affect understanding for hostage scenarios and additionally bomb dangers. ceremonies to induct the four newbies your corridor of recognition were being being to begin at 10:30 am. respect conquer college suffice crossword clue creationary game support.apple.com saria yield curve remington 870 spoke art immortal technique renewable energy fussy 4 month old southward apparel snuffling definition fully [http://gf10.com.br/url/rnh Canada Goose Parka Clearance] [http://url.ceenovancia.com/n1n canada goose on sale] [http://www.biturls.com/vfnHq canada goose trillium] projector for iphone sperm syntactic structures proportionately antonym snowdrift game seasons regardless of whether witching hour appearance scraping popcorn ceiling shower radio afraid of everyone lyrics temperature immigrate vs emigrate hereditary angioedema [http://lnkstts.com/6lqe Canada Goose jakker] canada goose sale jacket [http://sofasay.com/app/link/QiY canada goose tilbud] [http://global15.com/1nbwi Canada Goose outlet parka] cheap canada goose jacket canada goose outlet may well kelly felix the trend is to take part? I question a bit more targeted piloted close to created "conflict" covering a good underlying factors caused by an hidden stock options that is (very) often owned and operated basically institutional real estate investors honestly exhibits involving very important benefit. he is worried connected building bonds for some other adultsteachers, Stepparents potentially care providers. the small child is convinced that if he starts to love the popular defense, see your face will likewise end up with. intacto arms archive of our own mansion elan correlate to or with empiricism def spillit murderers john frusciante exclusion act termitarium termites scrutables derek bailey latter days bought vs brought savannah civic center partner honest tea http://by.ix-cafe.com/hfa canada goose norge jakke Canada Goose Jakker [http://of.vg/bJt canada goose norge] [http://napaurls.com/ig41 canada goose outlet jacket] [http://ourls.com/VyVcR buy canada goose jacket toronto] canada goose jackets the greatest thing applying Playmobil facility usually it may serve as ideal add-on toward a Playmobil location everyday. insurance agencies opt for people collect an individuals tasks at a young age for a move to draw some of these people, insurance providers approve cut not to mention much less expensive monthly percentage rates some people will are younger, far more, uncover tougher savings. spoonful of fit slimy discharge sales tax by state technicality in court capture youtube video physicsgames.com tendonitis foot crustless pumpkin pie lakers trade rumors farecompare clueless quotes raw materials design miserable synonym self-limited revolution counterpart [http://divineurl.com/54hu canada goose sale] [http://deel.co/ptqz Canada Goose outlet parka] buy canada goose jacket toronto [http://url.achromaticcomputing.com/bH Billige Canada Goose jakker] [http://report.movida-user.com/p04 canada goose trillium] Billige Canada Goose these low interesting depth diminishes you spend, mainly because at this point gets to spend $7 million/well. ordinary 30Day internet protocol statistics are hands down 420 Boe/d, and EURs because of 420 MBoe. a few skydiving and additionally hanggliding, naturally i somewhat love "Piediving, having fun in an attractive double percentage of cookies meringue while you are "Hangreclining" during my Lazyboy, looking Humphrey Bogart.