BoatShoes;1507647 wrote:Wife who doesn't work or Nanny does it. LOL! <------------- What more needs to be said???

I wonder what teh p00rz with special needs children would think of this blubber when they have to send their handicapped loved ones off to nursing homes. If it was a p00r we were talking about...Sleeper now that he's free might chime in and say how they should be jailed and/or castrated for having children they couldn't afford.

"Oh woe is me...I'm going to have to pay for my child with after-tax dollars while the p00rz could only dream of having that type of problem when it comes to their special needs children"

But I appreciate the kind words.

Manhattan Buckeye;1507649 wrote:What is it about you liberals that make you so hateful?

pmoney25;1507655 wrote:Liberals only pretend to care about the poor so they can get votes. It helps them sleep better at night to act like they actually give a shit and want to help people escape poverty instead of creating programs that trap people in perpetual poverty.

gut;1507660 wrote:It's easy to be compassionate with other people's money.

Manhattan Buckeye;1507649 wrote:They weren't kind. I don't know if you have a law degree or not, but you know nothing how law firms operate. And I'm sure my buddy who's kid has Rett's Syndrome and probably won't live until the age of 20 would appreciate your kind, liberal words. What is it about you liberals that make you so hateful?

pmoney25;1507655 wrote:Liberals only pretend to care about the poor so they can get votes. It helps them sleep better at night to act like they actually give a shit and want to help people escape poverty instead of creating programs that trap people in perpetual poverty.

gut;1507660 wrote:It's easy to be compassionate with other people's money.

pmoney25;1507648 wrote:I meet with Small Business Customers all the time, Businesses under 2 Million in Total Sales. The vast majority, the number one concern is how this is going to effect their business. Whether its the cost of healthcare or the effect of their partners/vendors/customers not having as much disposable income to use their services/products.

BoatShoes;1507682 wrote:The United States creates the dollars that go into rich people's bank accounts. Hope this helps.

BoatShoes;1507682 wrote:The United States creates the dollars that go into rich people's bank accounts.

Manhattan Buckeye;1507685 wrote:"The United States creates the dollars that go into rich people's bank accounts. Hope this helps."

I haven't been to the United States since May of 2012. Can you explain to my how the United States has done anything to pad my bank account? Yet we still pay taxes.

Boatshoes, have you gone full retard?

BoatShoes;1507749 wrote:The United States as the primary of enforcer of world wide trade is justified in taxing u.s. citizens abroad on their worldwide income whereas other countries aren't.

BoatShoes;1507682 wrote:The United States creates the dollars that go into rich people's bank accounts. Hope this helps. We could provide any amount of dollars to the p00rz that we want w/o a dime from rich people. We only need to tax enough to create a notional demand for the currency and alleviate any potential inflation.

BoatShoes;1507682 wrote:The United States creates the dollars that go into rich people's bank accounts.

BoatShoes;1507682 wrote:Hope this helps. We could provide any amount of dollars to the p00rz that we want w/o a dime from rich people.

BoatShoes;1507682 wrote:We only need to tax enough to create a notional demand for the currency and alleviate any potential inflation.

BoatShoes;1507647 wrote:Wife who doesn't work or Nanny does it. LOL! <------------- What more needs to be said???

I wonder what teh p00rz with special needs children would think of this blubber when they have to send their handicapped loved ones off to nursing homes. And then they're just takers on the welfare state anyways because they'd have to rely on medicaid instead of subsidized accounts with special consumption tax treatment that mostly only high-earners/producers/non-takers get to use...

If it was a p00r we were talking about...Sleeper now that he's free might chime in and say how they should be jailed and/or castrated for having children they couldn't afford.

"Oh woe is me...I'm going to have to pay for my child with after-tax dollars while the p00rz could only dream of having that type of problem when it comes to their special needs children"

And even better...that Nanny who I'm sure your bro doesn't provide health insurance for like he gets through his employer...is now going to be able to buy subsidized individual insurance that has similar benefits like free checkups that people like your bro get through his firm.....not high-deductible catastrophic insurance that you think is good enough for teh p00rz but is pretty much universally unpopular.

But I appreciate the kind words.

BoatShoes;1507678 wrote:I actually sympathize with your friend but you seem to act like there aren't people with children with disabilities who are much worse off than your friend. Fact is, your friend is lucky that he can have his wife and an additional helper aid his child and you're talking about the loss of a massive tax subsidy/tax expenditure while constantly complain about how wrong it is to provide tax subsidies/tax expenditures to people who are worse off than your friend...like those in Obamacare.

Your complaints come off as awfully detached from what types of problems people have IMHO.

BoatShoes;1507918 wrote:http://www.cnbc.com/id/101064954

46% of respondents opposed Obummercare while 37% opposed the Affordable Care Act. This is what we're dealing with.

We'll see how upset people are when they get large subsidies for purchasing individual insurance.

Commander of Awesome;1508281 wrote:[video=youtube;JZkk6ueZt-U][/video]

Has this been posted yet?

QuakerOats;1508478 wrote:The Democrats in 2014 should by all means be asked relentlessly to defend their monster."