A child born to parents who are metabolically deranged, a mother who is consuming a terrible diet and living in an a toxic environment can have the same effects as a child of a drug addicted/abusing mother. That's what is scary. Kids are being brought into the world with the same metabolic problems the parents have. I mean, you have toddlers with Type 2 Diabetes. You have rates of Autism running rampant. There's a lot more, and all of these conditions/diseases are up for debate too. Given that, it's very easy to see how these children are viewed by parents, doctor's and the individuals themselves as "genetic lost causes". Afterall, the way we have interpretted genetics on a broad level, the definition is fit to a T with these folks.Con_Alma;1443211 wrote:That's the part that I don't understand. There's clearly more that hasn't been explained in this thread...at least to me, lol, that I don't know about. How can a genetic predisposition dictate the type and volume of food consumption?
However, I think the point being made is of these cases, a vast majority of them are NOT actual genetics. Instead, they are environmental impacts on the genes causing some serious confusion. The bad news is, this stuff often gets overlooked and never addressed. The good news is, if addressed, it CAN be reversed in the lifetime of that individual. It doesn't take generations to fix like true gene evolution would.