Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
May 29, 2013 6:08pm
Had a smashed thumb, not a cutlike_that;1449591 wrote:There is a difference between being injured and hurt. Based on the fact you tried to make yourself look tougher than Derek rose by saying you played a round of golf with a cut hand, I'm going to assume you were just "hurt" during that period of time you played lacrosse.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 29, 2013 10:24pm
1-1 5 min left
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
May 29, 2013 10:33pm
Wow. Just wow.
No goal.
No goal.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
May 29, 2013 10:33pm
Terrible break for the Hawks.
ptown_trojans_1
Posts: 7,632
May 29, 2013 10:35pm
That just sucked the air out of the building.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 29, 2013 10:35pm
Wowwww
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
May 29, 2013 10:35pm
Crazy. That's so shitty for the hawks
ohiobucks1
Posts: 4,915
May 29, 2013 10:36pm
That was the worst call I've ever seen in sports
ohiobucks1
Posts: 4,915
May 29, 2013 10:37pm
I am kind of a hawks fan (not really but my GF loves them) but I've literally never seen a call that was that important and that bad even if it was "technically" right which I have no idea if it was or wasnt
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
May 29, 2013 10:37pm
ohiobucks1;1449903 wrote:That was the worst call I've ever seen in sports
+1 brutal. Who gives a shit if two guys are wrestling?
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 29, 2013 10:40pm
Especially so far away from the play.chicago510;1449905 wrote:+1 brutal. Who gives a shit if two guys are wrestling?
But then again, the announcers were calling it a pretty good call, so who knows. I know zero about the rules of hockey.
ohiobucks1
Posts: 4,915
May 29, 2013 10:40pm
chicago510;1449905 wrote:+1 brutal. Who gives a shit if two guys are wrestling?
The thing I noticed was that the ref who called it off was literally watching the Blackhawks about to shoot. I even slo-mo ed it and watch him. He sees the guy thrown to the ice then looks at the play, watches it for like 3 seconds then waves his arms. It's ridiculous
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
May 29, 2013 10:41pm
Also on replay...what did Saad even do? Terrible.
ohiobucks1
Posts: 4,915
May 29, 2013 10:41pm
My GF says they are just saying that so that there wont be a huge controversy and my buddy who is a wings fan also told me he thought it was a ridiculously bad call.SportsAndLady;1449906 wrote:Especially so far away from the play.
But then again, the announcers were calling it a pretty good call, so who knows. I know zero about the rules of hockey.
ohiobucks1
Posts: 4,915
May 29, 2013 10:42pm
He gets thrown into the ground and like punches up while trying to get his balance. It's seriously probably the worst call I've ever witnessed in my 23 yearschicago510;1449908 wrote:Also on replay...what did Saad even do? Terrible.
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
May 29, 2013 10:44pm
Doc and Enzo rarely point out terrible calls. Jones and Milbury agree that it was shit.
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
May 29, 2013 10:45pm
That's why you get up instead of doing the little extracurricular activities in a Game 7. He jumped on him deliberately, whether they should have stopped the play or not doesn't matter, don't do stupid shit like that. Totally deserved a penalty there
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
May 29, 2013 10:46pm
Yeah an absolute shit call I really hope the hawks win.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 29, 2013 10:47pm
Why would they care if there is a controversy?ohiobucks1;1449909 wrote:My GF says they are just saying that so that there wont be a huge controversy and my buddy who is a wings fan also told me he thought it was a ridiculously bad call.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 29, 2013 10:47pm
Lol figuresClassyposter58;1449912 wrote:That's why you get up instead of doing the little extracurricular activities in a Game 7. He jumped on him deliberately, whether they should have stopped the play or not doesn't matter, don't do stupid shit like that. Totally deserved a penalty there
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
May 29, 2013 10:48pm
I will say that's the right call however. You know why Hjalmarsson was wide open? Because KQ had a guy on his back!
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
May 29, 2013 10:50pm
Classyposter58;1449916 wrote:I will say that's the right call however. You know why Hjalmarsson was wide open? Because KQ had a guy on his back!
Because he pushed the guy into his own bench.
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
May 29, 2013 10:51pm
Classyposter58;1449916 wrote:I will say that's the right call however. You know why Hjalmarsson was wide open? Because KQ had a guy on his back!
And because Zetterberg fell.
But other than that yes.
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
May 29, 2013 10:52pm
So hit him back. Don't jump on him and rip his helmet off, that's gonna get a penalty every time. And Quincey is a defenseman he would have been back therechicago510;1449917 wrote:Because he pushed the guy into his own bench.
ohiobucks1
Posts: 4,915
May 29, 2013 10:59pm
Suck it