Marlins at Reds - Game 2

Pro Sports 47 replies 758 views
Azubuike24's avatar
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Apr 19, 2013 9:53pm
WTF. It's almost like Votto's eyes are messed up. That 0-1 swing was...pathetic.
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Apr 19, 2013 9:54pm
Midstate01;1430173 wrote:94mph. Its very hittable. Reason why he can't be a starter. But as the closer he should be hitting no less then 97.

Him throwing 94 mph is zero reason why he can't be a starter.
Midstate01's avatar
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Apr 19, 2013 9:56pm
Ironman92;1430197 wrote:Him throwing 94 mph is zero reason why he can't be a starter.

It is. His 94 is VERY hittable because he isnt comfortable going to secondary pitches
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Apr 19, 2013 9:56pm
Terry Tate sucks.
osu45804's avatar
osu45804
Posts: 6,188
Apr 19, 2013 9:57pm
Votto: 24 BB's 16 K's 14 H's
Midstate01's avatar
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Apr 19, 2013 9:58pm
Terrible loss
Azubuike24's avatar
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Apr 19, 2013 9:58pm
TT did his duty. Time for a new 4+ game winning streak.
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Apr 19, 2013 9:58pm
Midstate01;1430204 wrote:It is. His 94 is VERY hittable because he isnt comfortable going to secondary pitches

Him not getting comfortable with other pitches is THE reason.
M
mhs95_06
Posts: 8,167
Apr 19, 2013 9:58pm
Reds on track to outscore the Marlins in the series by 14-8, but lose the series 3-1!
Midstate01's avatar
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Apr 19, 2013 10:00pm
Ironman92;1430219 wrote:Him not getting comfortable with other pitches is THE reason.

But since hes not, he cant pitch 94. 94 is relevant. ..period.
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Apr 19, 2013 10:03pm
Midstate01;1430226 wrote:But since hes not, he cant pitch 94. 94 is relevant. ..period.

He can pitch 94.....but he can't throw it where he did. He has to Al Leiter/Tom Glavine the zone.
Midstate01's avatar
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Apr 19, 2013 10:05pm
97 up in the zone and thats a k. 94 amd its gone.
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Apr 19, 2013 10:09pm
Midstate01;1430238 wrote:97 up in the zone and thats a k. 94 amd its gone.

He's gotta know if it's going to come out 94 or 97....I think he underestimated the hitter and didn't let it fly and it cost him. I'm not sure 3mph strikes him out or he fouls it off deep into section 138....but I feel if he throws it 3 inches higher he gets a pop out or lives for another pitch.
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Apr 19, 2013 10:14pm
I hate the set up by Hanigan also....he set up right smack in the middle and Chapman threw it waist high.....I do not believe 97 or 99 gets an out on this location in a hitter's count.

Azubuike24's avatar
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Apr 19, 2013 10:15pm
From my understanding, Chapman still doesn't call his own pitches. Ever, unlike a few of the other guys on the staff who have complete control (with Hanigan). Neither does Hanigan, at least 100% of the time. It comes from the dugout for Chapman. Now, I'm not saying this is bad, but there are some games where Chapman is about 20% above the capability of any other pitcher. The nights he hits 100-102, nobody touches him. If they put it in play, rarely does it do damage and rarely can a team get more than 1 hit in a row.

However, many other times, like tonight, he needs to get up there and pitch. He can't rely on throwing 95 past a guy 5 straight times. I feel the calls coming from the dugout assume the "freak" Chapman is always out there, even when his control might be shaky or his arm it a bit dead. They need to adapt. Let him throw more sliders. Just the fear that he could throw it 100+ is going to get him an advantage before the first pitch of an at-bat is thrown.
wildcats20's avatar
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Apr 19, 2013 10:26pm
Who's next?

Someone who hasn't created a thread yet...

mhs???
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Apr 19, 2013 10:31pm
wildcats20;1430275 wrote:Who's next?

Someone who hasn't created a thread yet...

mhs???

Too late
Azubuike24's avatar
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Apr 19, 2013 10:38pm
I'll take another turn here soon, but I'm planning on at least a 5-game streak. Terry Tate is the first to take a 2nd run, and it was a 5-game run (4 wins).
Terry_Tate's avatar
Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
Apr 19, 2013 10:40pm
6-2 for the year so far. Not too bad.
Azubuike24's avatar
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Apr 19, 2013 10:43pm
Terry_Tate;1430294 wrote:6-2 for the year so far. Not too bad.
We need some standings, haha.

At least before it becomes a major pain to go back and track. It's a long fucking season...
Midstate01's avatar
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Apr 19, 2013 10:45pm
I'm 0-1
wildcats20's avatar
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Apr 19, 2013 10:50pm
Midstate01;1430301 wrote:I'm 0-1
Me too :cry:
Ironman92's avatar
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Apr 20, 2013 7:24am
I'm 0-1 and fittingly enough it was Dusty worst game blowing a big lead to the Pirates. Had a 5-0 lead in the 7th and Broxton is left in while being horrible the whole time, walking 3 and giving up 6 runs. Bruce was 0-5 with 3 K also.