Disgusted with kasich administration - Part III

Politics 116 replies 4,955 views
B
Bigdogg
Posts: 1,429
May 30, 2013 10:19pm
jmog;1450235 wrote:Did you fail math or statistics? Your own site that you posted a link to says EXACTLY what he typed.
Nope but you must have. Last year says 34th just like elbuckeye said. I asked where he got the 13th.
pmoney25's avatar
pmoney25
Posts: 1,787
May 30, 2013 11:17pm
Bigdogg;1450416 wrote:Nope but you must have. Last year says 34th just like elbuckeye said. I asked where he got the 13th.

Ummm. Maybe I can't read but under the column that says 2012 rank. Ohio is 13.
majorspark's avatar
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
May 30, 2013 11:22pm
Bigdogg;1450416 wrote:Nope but you must have. Last year says 34th just like elbuckeye said. I asked where he got the 13th.
I'm laughing my ass off. Are you seriously this dense? Or just a liar. Dude we all make mistakes credible people own up to them.
elbuckeye28;1449697 wrote:Ohio ranked 13th last year.
elbuckeye28;1449697 wrote:if you pull up the 12 month moving average, which would be give a clearer picture of the long-term trend, Ohio is 34th.
majorspark's avatar
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
May 30, 2013 11:27pm
pmoney25;1450457 wrote:Ummm. Maybe I can't read but under the column that says 2012 rank. Ohio is 13.
You like the rest of us can read.
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
May 31, 2013 2:39am
I can confirm. The link posted says Ohio is 13th.
HitsRus's avatar
HitsRus
Posts: 9,206
May 31, 2013 7:25am
...LOL These last posts show that you just can't throw *** against the wall and expect not to get called on it. The people on here are thoughtful and critical...and read links.
bases_loaded's avatar
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
May 31, 2013 7:39am
To be fair. Maybe biggdog was subtracting 13 from the number of Obama states(60) to get his adjusted number of 47.
fish82's avatar
fish82
Posts: 4,111
May 31, 2013 10:12am
This thread took a pretty amusing turn. :laugh:
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
May 31, 2013 12:32pm
fish82;1450557 wrote:This thread took a pretty amusing turn. :laugh:
Never argue with a stupid person. First they'll drag you down to their level, then they will beat you with experience.
majorspark's avatar
majorspark
Posts: 5,122
May 31, 2013 12:37pm
Manhattan Buckeye;1450617 wrote:Never argue with a stupid person. First they'll drag you down to their level, then they will beat you with experience.
LOL
Abe Vigoda's avatar
Abe Vigoda
Posts: 164
May 31, 2013 10:02pm
You can changes filters to fit what you want. Bigdogg is correct in what he said. Total private 12 month average, April 2013 , Ohio ranks 34th. It is what it is, Kasich is not doing his job. To take shots at him makes you all look silly. His record is his record.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
May 31, 2013 10:05pm
What cracks me up is the libs on here are ripping Kasich for doing a better job than Obama. But on Obama they are crickets...
B
Bigdogg
Posts: 1,429
May 31, 2013 10:13pm
You guys are idiots if you cant understand what I said. Not my problems but very entertaining.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
May 31, 2013 10:15pm
Bigdogg;1450859 wrote:You are an idiot. Read what I said.
I think it's fairly well established that others are not reading what you think you're saying.

I read what you said. And even though you are wrong, it still doesn't change the fact that you are holding Kasich to a much higher standard than Dear Leader.
B
Bigdogg
Posts: 1,429
May 31, 2013 10:50pm
B
Bigdogg
Posts: 1,429
May 31, 2013 10:52pm
B
Bigdogg
Posts: 1,429
May 31, 2013 11:03pm
Sorry, not sure why you want to dispute it. If you put in the variables you get what I say. It's not worth arguing with a bunch of idiots who obviously have no clue of what they are talking about. Stay in your bubble.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
May 31, 2013 11:21pm
Bigdogg;1450880 wrote:Sorry, not sure why you want to dispute it. If you put in the variables you get what I say. It's not worth arguing with a bunch of idiots who obviously have no clue of what they are talking about. Stay in your bubble.
Typical response from a liberal. Completely void of intelligence.

I know smart people who are liberals. Sadly, I know no liberals who are smart people.
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Jun 1, 2013 4:41am
"
Ohio 46 0.09 13 1.73 4.70 5,174.80 5,170.10
M
Manhattan Buckeye
Posts: 7,566
Jun 1, 2013 4:43am
The 13 is the column of 2012 (last year) rank.

I have no idea why BigDogg and Abe Vigoda can't read, but I guess this bunch of idiots is too dense for them.
HitsRus's avatar
HitsRus
Posts: 9,206
Jun 1, 2013 8:21am
[INDENT]What cracks me up is the libs on here are ripping Kasich for doing a better job than Obama. But on Obama they are crickets... [/INDENT]
It becomes even more laughable when you plug in the years for Strickland's term, in which the 'rank' was nearly 40+ across his entire term. I think there was a 38 in there.;)
J
jmog
Posts: 6,567
Jun 2, 2013 12:48am
Bigdogg;1450416 wrote:Nope but you must have. Last year says 34th just like elbuckeye said. I asked where he got the 13th.
I have a B.S degree in applied mathematics as well as 2 degrees in chemical engineering.

I assure you, I did not fail math.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Jun 2, 2013 12:50am
jmog;1451403 wrote:I have a B.S degree in applied mathematics as well as 2 degrees in chemical engineering.

I assure you, I did not fail math.
Yeah, but I'll bet you've never taken LIBERAL math.
believer's avatar
believer
Posts: 8,153
Jun 2, 2013 7:09am
gut;1451404 wrote:Yeah, but I'll bet you've never taken LIBERAL math.
It's really simple. I figured it out a long time ago.

For example, if Democrats demand a 7% tax increase to fund more wealth redistribution, but the Rhino Repubs only agree to a 4% increase, the Congressional Dems howl from the mountaintops that the Repubs cut spending by 3%. Then the leftist MSM reports it as fact.
E
elbuckeye28
Posts: 919
Jun 4, 2013 1:45pm
Bigdogg;1450416 wrote:Nope but you must have. Last year says 34th just like elbuckeye said. I asked where he got the 13th.
As others have stated, the data was right in the link. The way you presented the data was problematic. You picked the more volatile statistic and ignored the statistic that better explains the trend while also ignoring the previous year's data that does not support your beliefs. It was pure data dredging and confirmation bias.