Can't work muck worse than the "gun-free zone" idea.Devils Advocate;1422399 wrote:Next : comments about how guns in school would have stopped this.
Good point F4F. Obviously not that big of a deal when compared to that massacre. Hell compare Conn shooting to an atom bomb....hardly even news. /sarcasmFly4Fun;1422413 wrote: Compared to one armed person taking out twenty-seven people in Connecticut.
It was supposedly an exacto knife. That's more comparable to a BB gun.Fly4Fun;1422413 wrote: I think it's safe to say that it is a lot easier to do more damage with guns than knives.
prob get bant for harrassmentCommander of Awesome;1422417 wrote:Good point F4F. Obviously not that big of a deal when compared to that massacre. Hell compare Conn shooting to an atom bomb....hardly even news. /sarcasm
So you really don't think guns are inherently more dangerous than knives? I understand the criticism of me cherry picking the Connecticut school shooting to compare against this. But I did that as this is a relatively high number of injuries for an incident involving a knife. And that shooting was also a higher number and recent.Commander of Awesome;1422417 wrote:Good point F4F. Obviously not that big of a deal when compared to that massacre. Hell compare Conn shooting to an atom bomb....hardly even news. /sarcasm
Where did someone say Knives are more dangerous than guns?Fly4Fun;1422422 wrote:So you really don't think guns are inherently more dangerous than knives? I understand the criticism of me cherry picking the Connecticut school shooting to compare against this. But I did that as this is a relatively high number of injuries for an incident involving a knife. And that shooting was also a higher number and recent.
But completely disregarding that comparison, it's laughable to suggest that guns aren't more dangerous than knives. I can tell you 100/100 times if I was given a choice to either have to face someone with a knife or a gun, I'd choose the guy with a knife. Or similarly if I was in a class room full of people, if someone were to burst into a room, I'd prefer them to be "armed" with knives over guns.
So some of these comments trying to poke fun at the anti-gun crowd really miss the mark, which is all I was trying to point out.
No where. Where did I suggest someone said that?Commander of Awesome;1422423 wrote:Where did someone say Knives are more dangerous than guns?
Fly4Fun;1422425 wrote:No where. Where did I suggest someone said that?
Sounded to me like you were arguing with yourself, or perhaps someone in the political forums. Wouldn't doubt that some idiot on here would have said that. Doesn't look like anyone said though, which makes your statements puzzling. Not sure why you felt the need to soap box about that 2 times.Fly4Fun;1422422 wrote:So you really don't think guns are inherently more dangerous than knives?
It's laughable to suggest that guns aren't more dangerous than knives.
Commander of Awesome;1422427 wrote:Sounded to me like you were arguing with yourself, or perhaps someone in the political forums. Wouldn't doubt that some idiot on here would have said that. Doesn't look like anyone said though, which makes your statements puzzling. Not sure why you felt the need to soap box about that 2 times.
I think you forgot to read this.Fly4Fun;1422425 wrote:But a comments such as jmog's or queencity's suggest that they are on an equal level by trying to draw the comparison between this and school shootings. Hence my post.
Know I read their posts. queencity/jmog's was an obvious joke poking fun at politicians/anti gun ppl thinking that more rules and paper work at the way to solving issues. You thought he was serious? Hmmmmm....Fly4Fun;1422429 wrote:I think you forgot to read this.
No, which is why earlier I said:Commander of Awesome;1422435 wrote:Know I read their posts. queencity/jmog's was an obvious joke poking fun at politicians/anti gun ppl thinking that more rules and paper work at the way to solving issues. You thought he was serious? Hmmmmm....
Fly4Fun;1422422 wrote: So some of these comments trying to poke fun at the anti-gun crowd really miss the mark, which is all I was trying to point out.
So the joke missed the mark with you meaning you didnt find them funny?Fly4Fun;1422441 wrote:No, which is why earlier I said:
He disagrees.Fly4Fun;1422413 wrote:
I think it's safe to say that it is a lot easier to do more damage with guns than knives.
No kidding?Fly4Fun;1422413 wrote:I think it's safe to say that it is a lot easier to do more damage with guns than knives.
ohhhh...its a thugger college...nothing to see here folks.Tigerfan00;1422482 wrote:I heard that this college is in a major ghetto. Please no racist comments, thavoice.