royal_k
Posts: 4,423
Dec 23, 2009 6:44pm
Yeah I knew I spelled it wrong after I posted, but was too lazy to go back and edit it. It doen't matter. It was a stupid post and I made my point.september63 wrote: Its spelled douche!! and I would have to agree.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Dec 23, 2009 6:54pm
I was warned that there would be a Seahawks post.september63 wrote: Atleast Harrisons numbers werent against someone as bad as the Seahawks?
This is your official warning!
.jpg)
september63
Posts: 5,789
Dec 23, 2009 6:57pm
That was the best I could come up with after sitting bar stool to bar stool with him for 3 hrs last night. LOLwes_mantooth wrote:I was warned that there would be a Seahawks post.september63 wrote: Atleast Harrisons numbers werent against someone as bad as the Seahawks?
This is your official warning!
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Dec 23, 2009 8:02pm
Personally, I think Ahmad Bradshaw should have won it this week.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Dec 23, 2009 9:12pm
Or how about Josh Cribbs?
Beast.
Beast.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Dec 24, 2009 11:20am
Maybe its me, but rushing is more impressive than passing yards. Its a great day when a QB throws for 300 yards, let alone a RB rushing for 300 (ok he was 14 short). Do the math, Big Ben didnt even double a great do by a QB while Harrison almost tripled and is 3rd all time (not 5th to original poster).
Not to mention if Cribbs doesnt return to kicks Harrison is looking at 300+ easy.
Not to mention if Cribbs doesnt return to kicks Harrison is looking at 300+ easy.
iclfan2
Posts: 6,360
Dec 24, 2009 4:57pm
I agree that Harrison should have got it. 3rd best rushing yards ever? uhh yea.
royal_k
Posts: 4,423
Dec 24, 2009 6:40pm
yeah.....no respect for an accomplishment that is close to the best ever.
Writerbuckeye
Posts: 4,745
Dec 24, 2009 9:16pm
Sorry, but this is a stupid argument when we're talking about a player of the week honor.bigdaddy2003 wrote: The guy is good but I'm not ready to crown him the best running back in the league yet. The Chiefs aren't much of a team and they looked like they were just going through the motions for part of the game. Their win over Pittsburgh was crazy. Any given Sunday I guess.
I don't care WHO he was playing against. Look at the company he has in the top 5 rushing games of all time. It's not like anyone can go out there and collect 280 yards against a team anytime they want.
He deserved the award based on what he did. Period.
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Dec 24, 2009 9:34pm
It doesn't matter who the defense was, fact is, nobody else this year has put up 286 yards on the Chiefs..
Also, Jerome Harrison scored the game winning TD, so the Big Ben argument is nullified.
This was robbery.
Also, Jerome Harrison scored the game winning TD, so the Big Ben argument is nullified.
This was robbery.
A
Al Capone
Posts: 1,727
Dec 24, 2009 9:47pm
The fact is the people that vote for this award dont give a damn about the shithole organization
that is the Browns or its second rate players.
that is the Browns or its second rate players.
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Dec 24, 2009 9:58pm
Yeah, the best running back ever remark I made was a little much but I based it on the praise he was getting on the game thread. Anyways I acknowledge that rushing for 286 yards is a feat against anyone but Ben also deserved the award and if you look at my avatar you will see I would have a hard time admitting anything good about the Steelers.Writerbuckeye wrote:Sorry, but this is a stupid argument when we're talking about a player of the week honor.bigdaddy2003 wrote: The guy is good but I'm not ready to crown him the best running back in the league yet. The Chiefs aren't much of a team and they looked like they were just going through the motions for part of the game. Their win over Pittsburgh was crazy. Any given Sunday I guess.
I don't care WHO he was playing against. Look at the company he has in the top 5 rushing games of all time. It's not like anyone can go out there and collect 280 yards against a team anytime they want.
He deserved the award based on what he did. Period.
I guess we can only agree in the politics arena lol.
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Dec 25, 2009 12:36am
You are probably one of the most ignorant posters on this site..Al Capone wrote: The fact is the people that vote for this award dont give a damn about the shithole organization
that is the Browns or its second rate players.
That is all.
D
DaBrowns41
Posts: 1,304
Dec 25, 2009 12:51am
I may be biased, because I feel that Harrison should have won it, but Big Ben did have a hell of a game. He did have over 10 YPA along with 500+ yards. The NFL record for single game passing is 541 set by Norm Van Brocklin in '51. To come close to a record back in the 50's is a very big feat as well.
Both deserved it equally. We should only really be upset if a QB that threw for 4 TD's and 350+ yards won it over JH.
Both deserved it equally. We should only really be upset if a QB that threw for 4 TD's and 350+ yards won it over JH.
D
DaBrowns41
Posts: 1,304
Dec 25, 2009 12:51am
Were*LTrain23 wrote:You are probably one of the most ignorant posters on this site..Al Capone wrote: The fact is the people that vote for this award dont give a damn about the shithole organization
that is the Browns or its second rate players.
That is all.
He was one of the most ignorant posters on the site.
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
Dec 25, 2009 12:54am
Whoa.. haha..
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Dec 25, 2009 1:24am
Ha what did he do to get banned?
D
DaBrowns41
Posts: 1,304
Dec 25, 2009 1:27am
I'm assuming making pointless posts and trolling.bigdaddy2003 wrote: Ha what did he do to get banned?
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Dec 25, 2009 1:31am
^ Yeah, I just went back and read the few I missed.
I
I Wear Pants
Posts: 16,223
Dec 25, 2009 3:58pm
Both were top ten all time performances in the particular categories (Ben was 10th, Jerome 5th). The difference is that Ben's was against a good team, he through the winning pass in dramatic last second fashion, and he pretty much got the Steelers back into the playoff picture by himself (Wallace helped too).
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Dec 25, 2009 4:26pm
Where is this 5th all time coming from. NO WHERE I look is he less than 3rd behind Lewis and AP.I Wear Pants wrote: Both were top ten all time performances in the particular categories (Ben was 10th, Jerome 5th). The difference is that Ben's was against a good team, he through the winning pass in dramatic last second fashion, and he pretty much got the Steelers back into the playoff picture by himself (Wallace helped too).
Writerbuckeye
Posts: 4,745
Dec 25, 2009 6:05pm
Perhaps it's because you're correct.Laley23 wrote:Where is this 5th all time coming from. NO WHERE I look is he less than 3rd behind Lewis and AP.I Wear Pants wrote: Both were top ten all time performances in the particular categories (Ben was 10th, Jerome 5th). The difference is that Ben's was against a good team, he through the winning pass in dramatic last second fashion, and he pretty much got the Steelers back into the playoff picture by himself (Wallace helped too).
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Dec 25, 2009 6:11pm
Ok, thanks. Thats the second poster on this thread (unless it was the same one twice, too lazy to look it up) that said 5th. I just thought I was missing something.Writerbuckeye wrote:
Perhaps it's because you're correct.
royal_k
Posts: 4,423
Dec 25, 2009 9:56pm
It's threw, not through.......and and it was the 3rd best all time rushing performance, not the 5th.I Wear Pants wrote: Both were top ten all time performances in the particular categories (Ben was 10th, Jerome 5th). The difference is that Ben's was against a good team, he through the winning pass in dramatic last second fashion, and he pretty much got the Steelers back into the playoff picture by himself (Wallace helped too).
Hesston
Posts: 516
Dec 25, 2009 10:08pm
It was great to see Jerome run...run....and run somemore but it looked like the Chiefs quit.