Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems Wordio
Log In Create Account

Will MLB ever get one set of rules?

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ Will MLB ever get one set of rules?
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Feb 18, 2013 5:07 PM
Ridiculous that a league can't come to an agreement regarding the DH. No one wants to watch pitchers strike out or bunt 3-4 times a game. BORING.

If the NL wants to keep pitchers at the plate, perhaps they should form their own league and GTFO.
Feb 18, 2013 12:07pm
wes_mantooth's avatar

wes_mantooth

Tomfoolery & shenanigans

17,977 posts
Feb 18, 2013 5:13 PM
Nope. Tradition keeps the pitchers batting and the players union keeps the DH...to help lengthen careers.
Feb 18, 2013 12:13pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Feb 18, 2013 5:17 PM
wes_mantooth;1391518 wrote:Nope. Tradition keeps the pitchers batting and the players union keeps the DH...to help lengthen careers.
The NFL should go back to leather helmets; tradition is the dumbest thing ever and I can't wait for the baby boomers to die off.
Feb 18, 2013 12:17pm
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Feb 18, 2013 6:07 PM
You don't even like baseball do you?

I like both.

When the DH came about (1973?).....the amount of innings starting pitchers have thrown has went down ridiculously....and NL managers seem to not let their pitchers go as many innings, having to hit in a significant situation plays along with it.

The NL is a lot more strategy.
Feb 18, 2013 1:07pm
F

Footwedge

Senior Member

9,265 posts
Feb 18, 2013 6:24 PM
sleeper;1391514 wrote:Ridiculous that a league can't come to an agreement regarding the DH. No one wants to watch pitchers strike out or bunt 3-4 times a game. BORING.

If the NL wants to keep pitchers at the plate, perhaps they should form their own league and GTFO.
I love the DH rule...in general. The only problem with it is that some of the great pitchers going back in the day were great hitters, which should be a part of the equation.

Bob Gibson won a lot of his games with his stick. He wasn't a great hitting pitcher but a decent one. Jim Kaat tore the cover off the ball. Jim Palmer could rake.

Before my time, the record setting Indians of '54 had a staff full of good hitting pitchers.
Feb 18, 2013 1:24pm
HitsRus's avatar

HitsRus

Senior Member

9,206 posts
Feb 18, 2013 7:43 PM
I've got no problem with how it is now.
Feb 18, 2013 2:43pm
hasbeen's avatar

hasbeen

Excuse me, Flo?

6,504 posts
Feb 18, 2013 7:45 PM
It allows different strategy for each league. From the games to the off-season.
Feb 18, 2013 2:45pm
C

Con_Alma

Senior Member

12,198 posts
Feb 18, 2013 8:03 PM
What's ridiculous is that the original post states they can't come to an agreement. Not only can they come to an agreement but they have and it's the product that exists in MLB. The agreement is having both a DH and pitchers batting and they have clearly defined when each scenario will occur.
Feb 18, 2013 3:03pm
Heretic's avatar

Heretic

Son of the Sun

18,820 posts
Feb 18, 2013 8:15 PM
sleeper;1391514 wrote:Ridiculous that a league can't come to an agreement regarding the DH. No one wants to watch pitchers strike out or bunt 3-4 times a game. BORING.

If the NL wants to keep pitchers at the plate, perhaps they should form their own league and GTFO.
Just like no one wants to watch juiced-up 40-year-olds get a reprieve from having to downgrade themselves to being beer league softball superstars because the AL has a position where they don't have to field the ball (which is current an impossibility as all the roids have left their bodies so tattered that the act of bending over would cause four different muscles to completely rip off the bone) and can just swing for the fences every single time up?
Feb 18, 2013 3:15pm
Classyposter58's avatar

Classyposter58

Senior Member

6,321 posts
Feb 19, 2013 1:44 AM
sleeper;1391514 wrote:Ridiculous that a league can't come to an agreement regarding the DH. No one wants to watch pitchers strike out or bunt 3-4 times a game. BORING.

If the NL wants to keep pitchers at the plate, perhaps they should form their own league and GTFO.
NL games are incredibly boring. Teams play with basically 8 hitters and they work counts so much more it seems, compared to the AL where they just seem to let it rip. I've been to numerous Reds and Tigers games, the difference between the leagues is definitely noticeable. Obviously MLB players are MLB players, and yeah the NL doesn't suck, heck the Giants easily won the WS last year, but there's a reason the AL has had a better record in interleague play the last 9 seasons. Last year it was 142-110
Feb 18, 2013 8:44pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Feb 19, 2013 1:47 AM
Classyposter58;1391863 wrote:NL games are incredibly boring. Teams play with basically 8 hitters and they work counts so much more it seems, compared to the AL where they just seem to let it rip. I've been to numerous Reds and Tigers games, the difference between the leagues is definitely noticeable. Obviously MLB players are MLB players, and yeah the NL doesn't suck, heck the Giants easily won the WS last year, but there's a reason the AL has had a better record in interleague play the last 9 seasons. Last year it was 142-110
Well the NL does have a 7-6 WS advantage since 2000. So I guess the NL is better when it matters.
Feb 18, 2013 8:47pm
G

gport_tennis

Senior Member

1,796 posts
Feb 19, 2013 1:53 AM
Classyposter58;1391863 wrote:NL games are incredibly boring. Teams play with basically 8 hitters and they work counts so much more it seems, compared to the AL where they just seem to let it rip. I've been to numerous Reds and Tigers games, the difference between the leagues is definitely noticeable. Obviously MLB players are MLB players, and yeah the NL doesn't suck, heck the Giants easily won the WS last year, but there's a reason the AL has had a better record in interleague play the last 9 seasons. Last year it was 142-110

What was the Houston Astros record in interleague play last year. With them moving to the AL I got a maj in that would even things out
Feb 18, 2013 8:53pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Feb 19, 2013 1:58 AM
gport_tennis;1391870 wrote:What was the Houston Astros record in interleague play last year. With them moving to the AL I got a maj in that would even things out
6-9
Feb 18, 2013 8:58pm
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

A USA American

14,946 posts
Feb 19, 2013 2:00 AM
Footwedge;1391567 wrote:I love the DH rule...in general. The only problem with it is that some of the great pitchers going back in the day were great hitters, which should be a part of the equation.

Bob Gibson won a lot of his games with his stick. He wasn't a great hitting pitcher but a decent one. Jim Kaat tore the cover off the ball. Jim Palmer could rake.

Before my time, the record setting Indians of '54 had a staff full of good hitting pitchers.
I dont give a fuck about "back in they day"
Feb 18, 2013 9:00pm
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Feb 19, 2013 2:04 AM
wildcats20;1391865 wrote:Well the NL does have a 7-6 WS advantage since 2000. So I guess the NL is better when it matters.
Teams and leagues are pretty different.
Feb 18, 2013 9:04pm
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Feb 19, 2013 2:19 AM
Classyposter58;1391863 wrote:NL games are incredibly boring. Teams play with basically 8 hitters and they work counts so much more it seems, compared to the AL where they just seem to let it rip. I've been to numerous Reds and Tigers games, the difference between the leagues is definitely noticeable. Obviously MLB players are MLB players, and yeah the NL doesn't suck, heck the Giants easily won the WS last year, but there's a reason the AL has had a better record in interleague play the last 9 seasons. Last year it was 142-110

I disagree on working counts....the Yanks and Sox got that really going, the Giants jumped on that though. To me the AL jumps on more 1st pitches, but when they don't they work the count more than the NL.
Feb 18, 2013 9:19pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Feb 19, 2013 2:20 AM
sitting back and waiting for 2 or 3 run HRs is more exciting than stolen bases, hit and run, taking extra bases, etc?
Feb 18, 2013 9:20pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Feb 19, 2013 2:21 AM
wildcats20;1391865 wrote:Well the NL does have a 7-6 WS advantage since 2000. So I guess the NL is better when it matters.
I've labeled this the "SEC Fallacy". You are drawing a conclusion based on a small sample size while ignoring the far more relevant overall record. Best team does not equal best league.
Feb 18, 2013 9:21pm
hasbeen's avatar

hasbeen

Excuse me, Flo?

6,504 posts
Feb 19, 2013 2:43 AM
karen lotz;1391896 wrote:sitting back and waiting for 2 or 3 run HRs is more exciting than stolen bases, hit and run, taking extra bases, etc?
For those who only watch highlights, yes.
Feb 18, 2013 9:43pm
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Feb 19, 2013 2:53 AM
The NL had 7 of the 8 lowest scoring teams in baseball last year. It goes a little beyond the highlights.
Feb 18, 2013 9:53pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Feb 19, 2013 3:24 AM
Had 5 of the top 10 too.
Feb 18, 2013 10:24pm
ernest_t_bass's avatar

ernest_t_bass

12th Son of the Lama

24,984 posts
Feb 19, 2013 4:01 AM
karen lotz;1391896 wrote:sitting back and waiting for 2 or 3 run HRs is more exciting than stolen bases, hit and run, taking extra bases, etc?

Fuck you, Lotz. I agree with you!
Feb 18, 2013 11:01pm
Glory Days's avatar

Glory Days

Senior Member

7,809 posts
Feb 19, 2013 4:53 AM
sleeper;1391523 wrote:The NFL should go back to leather helmets; tradition is the dumbest thing ever and I can't wait for the baby boomers to die off.
maybe they would stop diving head first at each other and dying from brain injuries if they did.
Feb 18, 2013 11:53pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Feb 19, 2013 12:19 PM
Glory Days;1391978 wrote:maybe they would stop diving head first at each other and dying from brain injuries if they did.
Yeah because I'd really love to sit down and watch a bunch of white guys fall over each other on the field. :rolleyes:
Feb 19, 2013 7:19am
Classyposter58's avatar

Classyposter58

Senior Member

6,321 posts
Feb 19, 2013 9:07 PM
karen lotz;1391896 wrote:sitting back and waiting for 2 or 3 run HRs is more exciting than stolen bases, hit and run, taking extra bases, etc?
Uh yes? Why do you think baseball got so big in the 90s? Because players were hitting homers at an unbelievable pace. Also you act like the AL doesn't have base stealers or the hit and run. They just don't have to rely on it so much because of the DH
Feb 19, 2013 4:07pm