Fly4Fun;1373342 wrote:Also, this is a ridiculous argument.
It's the cousin of the sports argument: Who are you to criticize the athletes, I don't see you in the NFL.
It has absolutely no merit.
If you had to be an expert in the field to have an opinion, we might as well shut this place down.
I dont mind if you say she isnt the greatest in the world. But to say unattractive, GROSS legs or whatever is asinine. I dont touch girls that I find to have a gross feature. I would bang Kate Upton till my dick fell off.Fly4Fun;1373344 wrote:Why not have a pre-requisite to post your current 40 time, 225 bench press and vertical before you can comment on College Football/NFL threads?
Where did I say SHE is unattractive? I said she has a gorgeous face and great rack. But her body leaves a lot to be desired.Laley23;1373349 wrote:I dont mind if you say she isnt the greatest in the world. But to say unattractive, GROSS legs or whatever is asinine. I dont touch girls that I find to have a gross feature. I would bang Kate Upton till my dick fell off.
Fly4Fun;1373352 wrote:Where did I say SHE is unattractive? I said she has a gorgeous face and great rack. But her body leaves a lot to be desired.
And her legs are absolutely pathetic, they are freaking pegs. She has no calf muscle.
Again, your taking it to an extreme. I wouldnt want to be with a girl who has an unhealthy looking anything or a body that leaves a lot to be desired. Maybe she isnt a 10, but you guys are going overboard.ccrunner609;1373354 wrote:My grandmother has more muscle tone then her. The legs are very unhealthy looking.
This.WebFire;1373263 wrote:The sexiness wasn't over the top, but it was incredibly cheesy. That is an awful commercial. But Kate is hot, so I would watch again.
Fly4Fun;1373344 wrote:Why not have a pre-requisite to post your current 40 time, 225 bench press and vertical before you can comment on College Football/NFL threads?
thisFly4Fun;1373296 wrote:Hate to agree with ya...
But you can tell that she's the kind of girl that was just naturally in great shape younger but doesn't exercise at all. She's putting it on around the mid-section but they tried to hide that with the black top. And Peg-legs just look stupid and aren't attactive.
She's got a gorgeous face and a great rack, but her overall body leaves a lot to be desired.
I didn't even know she had legs.Pick6;1373384 wrote:I agree with everbody saying her legs leave a lot to be desired. Doesnt mean I wouldnt hit it, though. Her boobs are by far her best feature.
Oh so you like dudes? Explains a lot. :thumbup:Fly4Fun;1373331 wrote:Hey, I'm just calling it like I see it. She's skinny-fat. I don't find that particularly attractive for a girl's body. I find a fit girl with some muscle definition (not a body builder) to be much more attractive body wise.
the fuck is wrong with you!?Fly4Fun;1373331 wrote:Hey, I'm just calling it like I see it. She's skinny-fat. I don't find that particularly attractive for a girl's body. I find a fit girl with some muscle definition (not a body builder) to be much more attractive body wise.
Precisely. Just because she doesn't have pre-teen boy legs doesn't mean they aren't sexy! A concept that might confuse at least CC, but a valid one.Fab1b;1373356 wrote:Those unhealthy legs can be wrapped around me anytime!
