Mooney44Cards;1363178 wrote:Also after having looked at the nominees for Best Supporting Actor, I gotta think Phillip Seymour Hoffman has it in the bag.
I dunno, man. Christopher Waltz could vye for it as well.
Mooney44Cards;1363178 wrote:Also after having looked at the nominees for Best Supporting Actor, I gotta think Phillip Seymour Hoffman has it in the bag.
Yeah, I would say Waltz is the odds on favorite.O-Trap;1364938 wrote:I dunno, man. Christopher Waltz could vye for it as well.
I love all 3 of those movies, I just didn't like The Master. Not sure what it was, I thought I was really going to enjoy it, just didn't like it.Mooney44Cards;1364863 wrote:Probably not. I bet a lot of people hated that movie. You have to know what you're getting from the movie before even seeing it. PT Anderson's movies aren't about plot, they're about character. If you're the type of person that loves great plot (the vast majority of people are like this) then a lot of PT Anderson movies aren't for you. Boogie Nights is probably his most plot-driven film (its practically a love letter to Marty Scorsese), while Magnolia, There Will Be Blood, Punch Drunk Love, and The Master are more character films where "nothing happens". I like a movie like that every once in awhile as a change of pace. PT Anderson manages to make the films absolutely gorgeous as well as squeezing amazing acting performances out of his cast.
If it helps, my lady was sure she was going to hate it and yet couldn't stop talking about it afterwards. She loved it.SportsAndLady;1365042 wrote:I love all 3 of those movies, I just didn't like The Master. Not sure what it was, I thought I was really going to enjoy it, just didn't like it.
I'm going to check out Zero Dark Thirty tonight..my gf can stay at home or come, but I'm going.
He pretty much stole the spotlight in Django. Such an excellent performance.wes_mantooth;1364942 wrote:Yeah, I would say Waltz is the odds on favorite.
Fab4Runner;1363006 wrote:Hoping to see Silver Linings Playbook with Mantooth on Saturday. Otherwise, I haven't seen basically any of the movies that got the most noms. My birthday is coming up, though and I think Mantooth is going to get me some copies of some of them as a cheap, thoughtless gift.
fixedDevils Advocate;1365308 wrote:Nah. You are getting a roofie and an abortion
First year in awhile I really don't know who will win. Totally up for grabs between Argo, Les Miserables, Django Unchained, Lincoln and Zero Dark Thirtykiller_ewok;1365654 wrote:Les Mis is putting in work at the Golden Globes.
And much funnier than Billy Crystal last year. McFarlane is an excellent singer, so I'm surprised his opening didn't include more singing than it did.gorocks99;1395495 wrote:Not a bad start. MacFarlane better than Franco and Hathaway at least
From deadline.comGoPens;1395563 wrote:Expected so much more from the Bond salute. Very underwhelming.
Thanks Canada!friendfromlowry;1395592 wrote:I think Ben Affleck was on cocaine.
people get paid to write that drivel?bases_loaded;1395717 wrote:http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2013/02/25/why-was-michelle-obama-at-the-oscars/
fifyreclegend22;1395673 wrote:Agreed on Affleck. And the Academy Award for Drugstore Cowboy goes to..
He and Kristen Stewart might as well have just done a rail on stage. Obvious crack is obvious. Lol.