ernest_t_bass;1354473 wrote:Thank you for the obvious, original, and predictable post.
Seeing as how it was already answered in the thread you clearly hadn't read, I felt a smartass comment was in line.
ernest_t_bass;1354473 wrote:Thank you for the obvious, original, and predictable post.
dlazz;1354510 wrote:Seeing as how it was already answered in the thread you clearly hadn't read, I felt a smartass comment was in line.
The water catching fire is a result of methane in the ground. This usually isn't a problem, but when you frack the same layer from the same well multiple times to increase production and methane is present...it can and has happened.ccrunner609;1353449 wrote:I believe that the whole water on fire thing was proven wrong and that fracking had nothing to do with it
I agree the movie is biased. I also think sloppy fracking can pose significant risks.fan_from_texas;1353453 wrote:The movie isn't particularly accurate. Fracking poses some risks, but they tend to be more along the lines of seismic issues, not groundwater contamination (the fluids are injected at different levels). I'm not saying it's harmless, as there is a risk with any sort of drilling operation, but fracking, as I understand it, doesn't pose huge environmental risks.
Get paid first and don't sign the companies contract. Get a lawyer to draw one up that favors you.Devils Advocate;1353454 wrote:Drill baby drill......
^^If you sign without a lawyer, you most likely will have achieved thisDevils Advocate;1353454 wrote:And go frack yourself
Agreed, this is nuts and the taxpayers of this state need to start being more vocal about it.Mohican00;1353509 wrote:And something that rarely gets pointed out.......we've been disposing of haz and non haz waste via deep well injection for years and that does not get near the attention fracking does
It should and it starts with the energy lobby. They want satisfaction without accountability.rydawg5;1353578 wrote:Why was the bill passed in 2005 to keep it out of the Clean water act's reach? That's another thing that befuddles this humble soul.
I think a more accurate statement would be: "responsible energy harvesting can vastly improve the eastern ohio and western pa economies over the next 40 years"Tiernan;1353582 wrote:Fracking will save eastern Ohio and western PA economies over the next 40 yrs. The people against this are the jealous bastards who don't own land and aren't going to get rich.
half truth and not really applicable to what's going on in ohioTiernan;1353595 wrote:Fracking has been around the oil and gas industry since the 50s but its relatively new to this part of the country. TX, OK, ND, LA oil developers have been doing it for years and with a great safety record.
whole truth^^...and guys who have no experience with these relatively new processes will be getting their experience right here over the next 5-10 years. Finding responsible and reliable people to frack these wells is key and anybody who tells you monitoring is not necessary because they have been doing this forever...is cutting corners for profitPropJoe;1353604 wrote:Kind of. What we call fracking today is specifically slickwater horizontal fracturing, and it was first tried about a decade ago. Forms of hydraulic fracturing have been around since the 50's in some manner though.
It is...especially the contracts.fan_from_texas;1353614 wrote:It's complicated and nuanced.
great movieSonofanump;1353620 wrote:I drink your milkshake.
It ain't the first rodeo for eastern ohio landowners dealing with energy companies either.Tiernan;1353621 wrote:My point was this aint the first rodeo for the O&G guys moving into the shale fields of OH, PA & WV. Tree Huggers trying to make mountains out of mole hills with the safety scares. The big bucks flowing into Appalachia will quiet that noise down quickly.
The energy thats under the ground isn't going anywhere...If the deposits are as big as they say, they will come for them eventually under terms provided by the people of ohio...not some corporation from out west.rightfield;1354441 wrote:This is true. My dad is a surveyor and has worked around the oil industry for over 30 years in Ohio. He says it has been done here since he can remember but just not at the depths it is now. Drill baby, drill. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.
I think this issue is very political. I don't always agree with our governor, but I like his ideas on taxing the snot out of these guys and using the money to reduce our citizens taxes.rydawg5;1353627 wrote:I know we speak in hyperbole but this doesn't seem like a political dilemma for all, so I'm sure even some republicans (gun lovin, obama hating, waiting on Bush III to come and save us good ole boys) could even have some caution when watching documentaries about claims of this not being safe. Even SOME republicans do care about humanity and safety of the citizens (even if it's frowned upon by the party)
I am not sure if it is a hoax or not, but do you really find it odd that Hollywood would make a movie about some controversial environmental science and lean to the liberal/environment side of it (even if it wasn't proven or correct)?rydawg5;1353451 wrote:Okay - I'll google that and see what I find. Kinda weird they'd make a movie about it if it was a hoax. I didn't see a movie about the unstoppable Prius