Dr Winston O'Boogie
Posts: 1,799
Mar 21, 2013 7:32am
What is the status of the kid who starred in the horrible video related to the case?
jordo212000
Posts: 10,664
Mar 21, 2013 7:35am
Dr Winston O'Boogie;1410649 wrote:What is the status of the kid who starred in the horrible video related to the case?
Police basically said other than the fact that he is a d-bag, there was nothing they could do. They said he wasn't there and was just making light of the situation
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Mar 21, 2013 7:42am
With nearly all employers searching the web these days, he's pretty much kissed any notion of a career goodbye.Dr Winston O'Boogie;1410649 wrote:What is the status of the kid who starred in the horrible video related to the case?
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Mar 21, 2013 7:50am
fish82;1410643 wrote:I seriously doubt that's the real Cody Saltsman.
I don't really think it is either.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Mar 21, 2013 8:47am
M
MontyBrunswick
Mar 21, 2013 9:29am
queencitybuckeye;1410656 wrote:he's pretty much kissed any notion of a career goodbye.
I highly doubt it
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Mar 21, 2013 9:35am
Why's that?dlazz;1410728 wrote:I highly doubt it
M
MontyBrunswick
Mar 21, 2013 10:10am
queencitybuckeye;1410733 wrote:Why's that?
People with poor records get hired all of the time. I worked at a public university and they managed to hire a registered sex offender. He ended up getting canned for being a shitty worker and it was found out after the fact.
No, it wasn't me.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Mar 21, 2013 10:12am
if you say so.......dlazz;1410767 wrote:People with poor records get hired all of the time. I worked at a public university and they managed to hire a registered sex offender. He ended up getting canned for being a ****ty worker and it was found out after the fact.
No, it wasn't me.
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Mar 21, 2013 10:13am
Less so every day, but I did forget about the public sector and their built-in incompetence.dlazz;1410767 wrote:People with poor records get hired all of the time
S
SaltsmanCody
Posts: 101
Mar 22, 2013 12:25am
He's not a d-bag, he just made a mistake.jordo212000;1410651 wrote:Police basically said other than the fact that he is a d-bag, there was nothing they could do. They said he wasn't there and was just making light of the situation
S
SaltsmanCody
Posts: 101
Mar 22, 2013 2:26am
was it you?dlazz;1410767 wrote:People with poor records get hired all of the time. I worked at a public university and they managed to hire a registered sex offender. He ended up getting canned for being a ****ty worker and it was found out after the fact.
No, it wasn't me.
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Mar 22, 2013 6:44am
SaltsmanCody;1411517 wrote:He's not a d-bag, he just made a mistake.
Lol good one
T
ThePatriot
Posts: 166
Mar 22, 2013 9:16am
We're getting ready to move out of Da Ville but God I hope I'm around to see Reno and his crew bite the dust!!! That's if he actually knew something, of course, which I believe he did.
Get this show on the road DeWine!
Get this show on the road DeWine!
G
Gblock
Mar 22, 2013 9:42am
why is no one going down for selling alcahol to minors?
how come no one in this case including the girl didnt get charged with underage drinking?
how come no one in this case including the girl didnt get charged with underage drinking?
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Mar 22, 2013 9:56am
I think getting raped was enough of a "lesson learned." No need to pour salt on her wound.Gblock;1411604 wrote:why is no one going down for selling alcahol to minors?
how come no one in this case including the girl didnt get charged with underage drinking?
bases_loaded
Posts: 6,912
Mar 22, 2013 12:11pm
Don't you have to get caught in the act? I mean how can they prove anyone was drinking without an arrest that night or breathalyzer being administered?Gblock;1411604 wrote:why is no one going down for selling alcahol to minors?
how come no one in this case including the girl didnt get charged with underage drinking?
They should've faced a suspension from sporting events though.
Fly4Fun
Posts: 7,730
Mar 22, 2013 12:15pm
I'm pretty sure the police would be absolutely crucified if they tried to charge the girl that got raped with underage drinking...Gblock;1411604 wrote:why is no one going down for selling alcahol to minors?
how come no one in this case including the girl didnt get charged with underage drinking?
S
SaltsmanCody
Posts: 101
Mar 22, 2013 12:25pm
why would Jane charge herself?Gblock;1411604 wrote:why is no one going down for selling alcahol to minors?
how come no one in this case including the girl didnt get charged with underage drinking?
S
Shane Falco
Posts: 440
Mar 22, 2013 1:42pm
Ahhh... Im sure that would be painful!!like_that;1411611 wrote:I think getting raped was enough of a "lesson learned." No need to pour salt on her wound.
fish82
Posts: 4,111
Mar 22, 2013 1:58pm
Dude...you're not very good at this. Step back, pick a different screen name and try again. :rolleyes:SaltsmanCody;1411678 wrote:why would Jane charge herself?
L
lollercoaster
Posts: 10
Mar 22, 2013 5:37pm
When I register for this site under a new name(when I don't use a proxy) I'm banned within minutes. This guy posts the name of a 16 year old rape victim and it's still up 6 hours later. Solid moderating.SaltsmanCody;1411678 wrote:why would Jane charge herself?
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Mar 22, 2013 5:40pm
"Jane" isnt her name. And who are u?lollercoaster;1411924 wrote:When I register for this site under a new name(when I don't use a proxy) I'm banned within minutes. This guy posts the name of a 16 year old rape victim and it's still up 6 hours later. Solid moderating.
L
lollercoaster
Posts: 10
Mar 22, 2013 5:47pm
I assumed that's what he was getting at, maybe not. Regardless, why is someone who uses the real name of one of the underage members of a rape trial for his username, and then clearly tries to troll a thread about the situation not banned 2 days later? This is allowed but posting sexually suggestive gifs or poking fun at mods is an insta-ban.Pick6;1411926 wrote:"Jane" isnt her name. And who are u?
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Mar 22, 2013 6:26pm
lollercoaster;1411929 wrote:I assumed that's what he was getting at, maybe not. Regardless, why is someone who uses the real name of one of the underage members of a rape trial for his username, and then clearly tries to troll a thread about the situation not banned 2 days later? This is allowed but posting sexually suggestive gifs or poking fun at mods is an insta-ban.
Theres a difference between pornographic and sexually suggestive. Derp. You tried repeatedly to push those boundaries, despite multiple warnings and infractions and a site wide notice about Adsense. Get the fuck over it.
You were never banned for poking fun at mods.