It seems like it's hard for people to have this discussion "greatest athlete" without making it a "greatest player" argument.
For some reason, we can't separate the two.
97.1thefan was discussing Bo Jackson (being in the top 10) but then all of a sudden he was below Babe Ruth in rank of "greatest athlete"
You just can't talk about going for "most skilled athletic ability" without going to "how many championships" "stats" "longevity" examples - then all of a sudden you aren't seeing who was the best skilled athlete..
My Logic...
Line up ALL athletes in the PEAK of their prime.. Who do you pick if you want the best athlete on your team in his PEAK versus ALL OTHER ATHLETES.
Bo Jackson (Skilled athlete - can dominate anything he wants) - raw speed, power, skill
Basketball is a hard sport to define the athletes. Because you have to be tall to dominate, that doesn't necessarily mean Rajon isn't the best "athlete" - In fact his "athletic" ability probably has to be greater than Lebron James since he is so much shorter. The smaller athletes almost have to have more athletic ability to maintain their presence in a league filled with good athletes who are taller.
You have Raw Athletes - Line them up to run (they fast) but not skilled (havent yet learned the skill)
If you put Bo out on a soccer field on day 1 with no practice. He wouldnt be good at all, but he'd still be the best athlete out there.
Some guy on the bench in the NFL or NBA MAY be the best athlete period. We wouldn't even know.
rydawg5
Senior Member
R
2,639
posts
R
rydawg5
Senior Member
2,639
posts
Tue, Dec 11, 2012 7:48 PM
Dec 11, 2012 7:48 PM
Dec 11, 2012 7:48pm
