jaco;1500215 wrote:Never understood why Orrville and Wooster understand it's beneath them to schedule WCAL teams, but Triway has no compunctions. But, whatever floats their boats down there.
Since 2005, Triway is 5-6 against scheduled WCAL teams.
They're 0-2 against Smithville, and they're 5-4 against Waynedale.
Also worth noting, two of their wins against Waynedale were by one score or less.
Their scheduled games against Smithville during that time, they lost 41-7 and 39-0.
Their wins against Waynedale have been by 3 points, 16 points, 7 points, 24 points, and 15 points. Essentially, only one win was by more than two scores.
Waynedale's wins against them have been by 10 points, 15 points, 35 points, and 30 points.
Overall, the scoring between the two over that stretch is 184 (Triway) to 209 (Waynedale).
Throw in the Smithville games, and the WCAL has outscored Triway 289 - 191 in 11 games, with a record of 6-5 against Triway.
Of the years that Waynedale has beaten Triway, their league-play records have been 4-3, 6-1, 4-3, and 2-5. Their overall records have been 6-4, 9-3, 7-3, and 5-5.
Of the years that Triway has beaten Waynedale (not counting this year), Triway's overall records have been 7-3, 8-3, 8-3, and 8-3.
So, given all this, it hardly seems like Triway is above playing the WCAL. When they've played a league champ contender, they've gotten drubbed (sans 2008, where both teams went 8-3, and Triway won by 3 points) by 30 or more. They've lost to two mediocre Waynedale teams. In 2010, Triway (an eventual playoff team) beat a 2-8 Waynedale squad by a mere 7 points.
Now, don't misunderstane what I'm saying. Triway is a fine program. I take pride in having spent several years in their elementary school system, and I've cheered them on in several games. They are a quality school with a quality football program.
Perhaps the WCAL simply isn't the pee-wee program you think it is, though.